Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore)

Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore)

Triple Setup

177 gram

5000 mAh

Android 13

6.78" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

Dual Setup

620 gram

10000 mAh

Android 12

12.4" (Inch)

6GB / 8GB / 12GB RAM

Announced

Date

May 2023

August 2022

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

Unknown

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 13

Android 12

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

FuntouchOS 13

MIUI 13

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

-

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

-

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
70

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.1, A2DP, LE

5.2, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
100

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

164.2 x 74.7 x 7.8 mm

285 x 185.2 x 6.7 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

177 g

620 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Aluminum

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, Gold

Black, Silver, Green

Official available body color options.

Score

75
85

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695

Qualcomm Snapdragon 870

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Adreno 619

Adreno 650

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB

6GB / 8GB / 12GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

-

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.78"

12.4"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

AMOLED

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2400 pixels

1600 x 2560 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~388 ppi density, 120Hz

16:10 ratio, (~243 ppi density), 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, Corning Gorilla Glass 3

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

5000 mAh

10000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 44W

Fast charging 67W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Dual Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.79, PDAF

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

16 MP, f/2.45

20 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.4", 0.8µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
85

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

-

Dual Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

85
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

-

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

-

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Color Spectrum

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
80

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $260

~ $460

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €250

~ €450

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The build quality of the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) surpasses that of the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore), owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore). The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) plastic construction.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4).

In terms of screen protection performance, the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) outshines the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~388, the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) surpasses the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), which boasts ~243 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4).

In terms of display hardware, the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) stands out with its AMOLED technology display, presenting a significant advantage over the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), which incorporates an IPS LCD screen. The Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) with AMOLED technology excels in providing superior visual performance, marked by vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and higher contrast ratios. The architecture of AMOLED displays involves the emission of light individually from each pixel, facilitating precise control and achieving true blacks by completely turning off pixels. This characteristic contributes to a more immersive viewing experience characterized by enhanced color accuracy and sharpness.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) and the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) and the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

Comparing the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) that comes with 5G network capabilities, to the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) which lacks mobile SIM network support, underscores a clear advantage for the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore). In circumstances where users prioritize the use of mobile SIM features on their devices, the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) stands out as the preferable choice. The absence of mobile SIM network support in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) may limit its functionality for users seeking seamless connectivity through mobile networks. Consequently the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) emerges as the superior option in this particular aspect of comparison.

Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) that equipped with Wi-Fi 5, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 6 technology. This distinction positions the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 6 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 5. So, the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) with Wi-Fi 6 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore), ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) equipped with Bluetooth 5.1, while the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) comes with more latest Bluetooth 5.2 technology. In this scenario, Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) holds a technological advantage by adopting the more recent Bluetooth technology. Bluetooth 5.2 brings improvements in terms of enhanced services, better connection performance, and increased accuracy in device positioning. Therefore, the integration of Bluetooth 5.2 in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) positions it as the superior choice in Bluetooth technology, offering users a more advanced experience when compared with the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore).

Leveraging NFC technology, the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) emerges as the superior choice over the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4). The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) offers a RAM configuration of 8GB, while the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) boasts a more substantial 6GB / 8GB / 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referencing the specifications, Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) offers internal storage options ranging from 256GB, while Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) surpasses this with an impressive 128GB / 256GB / 512GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) boasts a formidable combination of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 processor and Adreno 619, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 and Adreno 619 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 processor and the Adreno 650. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 650 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) comes with less RAM than Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4). Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) holds an advantage over the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) and the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore), equipped with a 6.78" screen, is notably smaller than the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), which boasts a more generous 12.4" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

The main camera setup of the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) surpasses that Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) boasts Triple Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) falls behind with its Dual Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) emerges as a standout against the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), showcasing an impressive 64 MP camera, while the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) only comes with 50 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore), often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4). While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) holds a distinct advantage over the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore). The Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) boasts a larger 20 MP front camera, while the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) features a 16 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Sadly, the both of Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Substantial contrast in battery capacity between the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) and the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), with the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) boasting an impressive 10000 mAh compared to the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) 10000 mAh, significantly impacts their overall performance. In this scenario, the larger battery in the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) proves advantageous for several reasons. A bigger battery translates to a higher energy reservoir, allowing the device to sustain prolonged usage without requiring frequent recharges. This is particularly beneficial for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day, ensuring that the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) can provide a longer lasting and more dependable power supply.

In a positive development, both the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) and Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) emerges as the more advanced choice. The Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) boasts a Fast Charging capability of 67W, surpassing the Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) 44W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.

Security Features

At the security features, Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) demonstrates superiority over Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), primarily owing to its incorporation of a dedicated biometric sensor designed to enhance the device security. This contrasts sharply with Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), which lacks a dedicated biometric sensor, resulting in all security measures remaining at a standard level. The absence of a specialized security sensor on Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) places it at a disadvantage, as Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) provides users with an elevated and secure means of device access and authentication through its dedicated biometric feature.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Low quality body material used
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version
  • Average sound & audio quality

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Mobile network not available
  • No SIM Card function supported

Benchmark

Point Result

Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore)

Build Quality : 75
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 85

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

Build Quality : 85
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 70
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 80
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore)

Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore)

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) has better overall performance than Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore) has a very similar overall performance to Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4), based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4) has better overall performance than Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore), based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore)

Vivo Y78 5G (Singapore)

Amazon
Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

Xiaomi Mi Pad 5 Pro (12.4)

Amazon