Doogee S99

Doogee S99

Triple Setup

310 gram

6000 mAh

Android 12

6.3" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Ulefone Armor 18

Ulefone Armor 18

Triple Setup

409 gram

9600 mAh

Android 12

6.58" (Inch)

12GB RAM

Announced

Date

December 2022

January 2023

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

Unknown

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 12

Android 12

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

Android Stock UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

90
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.0, A2DP, LE

5.0, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
100

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

172.0 x 82.0 x 15.5 mm

175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

310 g

409 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H

Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810G

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, Brown, Gold, Silver

Black

Official available body color options.

Score

100
100

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Helio G96

MediaTek Dimensity 900

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G57 MC2

Mali-G68 MC4

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB

12GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB

256GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.3"

6.58"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2340 pixels

1080 x 2408 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

19:9 ratio, (~270 ppi density)

20:9 ratio, (~401 ppi density), 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass 5

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

6000 mAh

9600 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 33W

Fast charging 66W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 108 MP, f/1.88, 1/1.52", 0.80 µm

(Main) 108 MP, f/1.9, 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Night Vision) 64 MP, f/1.8

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Ultrawide) 16 MP, f/2.2

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

32 MP

32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the side)

Fingerprint (at the side)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Infrared Blaster, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Barometer

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $280

~ $410

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €270

~ €400

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18 are two distinct rugged phones that share the common trait of being designed to withstand extreme conditions. Rugged phones are built to endure harsh environments, making them ideal for individuals who work in demanding professions or engage in outdoor activities. These phones typically feature reinforced casings, durable materials, and are resistant to water, dust, and shocks.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18.

In terms of screen protection performance, the Doogee S99 appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Ulefone Armor 18 distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Ulefone Armor 18 not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Doogee S99 with its ~270 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Ulefone Armor 18, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~401. The Ulefone Armor 18 gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Ulefone Armor 18, its elevated ppi of ~401 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Doogee S99.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18 share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18.

When considering the refresh rate feature, the Doogee S99 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Ulefone Armor 18 takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 120Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.

Connectivity Features

Comparing Ulefone Armor 18 that which is only features by 4G network connectivity, to the Doogee S99 that already equipped with 5G capabilities, highlights a significant performance difference, with the latter inherently faster than Ulefone Armor 18. The inclusion of 5G technology in the Doogee S99 positions it as a more advanced and future proof device, offering users faster data speeds and improved connectivity in the swiftly evolving landscape of network technologies. In contrast, the limited 4G network support in Ulefone Armor 18 may result in comparatively slower data transfer rates. Consequently the Doogee S99 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing swift and efficient mobile connectivity experiences over the limitations of Ulefone Armor 18.

Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Doogee S99 that equipped with Wi-Fi 5, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Ulefone Armor 18 which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 6 technology. This distinction positions the Ulefone Armor 18 at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 6 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 5. So, the Ulefone Armor 18 with Wi-Fi 6 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Doogee S99, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18 both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.0 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Doogee S99 and the Ulefone Armor 18, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Now, Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18 stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Doogee S99 offers a RAM configuration of 8GB, while the Ulefone Armor 18 boasts a more substantial 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the Ulefone Armor 18 holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Doogee S99 presents a range of 256GB of internal memory storage, while Ulefone Armor 18 offers a 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Doogee S99 boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Helio G96 processor and Mali-G57 MC2, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Helio G96 and Mali-G57 MC2 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Doogee S99 to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Ulefone Armor 18 stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable MediaTek Dimensity 900 processor and the Mali-G68 MC4. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The MediaTek Dimensity 900 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Mali-G68 MC4 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Ulefone Armor 18 excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Ulefone Armor 18 emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Doogee S99 comes with less RAM than Ulefone Armor 18. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Ulefone Armor 18 holds an advantage over the Doogee S99 due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Ulefone Armor 18, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the Doogee S99 and the Ulefone Armor 18 may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The Doogee S99, equipped with a 6.3" screen, is notably smaller than the Ulefone Armor 18, which boasts a more generous 6.58" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the Ulefone Armor 18, offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the Ulefone Armor 18, with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.

Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the Doogee S99 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Ulefone Armor 18 takes it up a notch with an impressive 120Hz capability. This distinction places the Ulefone Armor 18 in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18 share a common ground, utilizing a Triple Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18 provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18 are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 108 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18 on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.

Doogee S99 stands out in the realm of smartphone cameras with its unique feature on main camera sector, that is already supported by Night Vision camera support, a capability notably absent in the Ulefone Armor 18. Night Vision cameras are specialized sensors equipped with advanced infrared technology, enabling them to capture clear and detailed images even in low light or complete darkness. This innovative feature provides users with enhanced visibility during nighttime or low light scenarios, making the Doogee S99 particularly advantageous for capturing moments in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of Night Vision on the Ulefone Armor 18 may limit its performance in such environments, giving the Doogee S99 a notable edge for users who prioritize superior camera capabilities, especially in low light situations.

When discussing front camera features, the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

When look on to front camera features of the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 32 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18 stand on equal footing with an 32 MP configuration.

Sadly, the both of Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18 are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18 may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Substantial contrast in battery capacity between the Doogee S99 and the Ulefone Armor 18, with the Ulefone Armor 18 boasting an impressive 9600 mAh compared to the Doogee S99 9600 mAh, significantly impacts their overall performance. In this scenario, the larger battery in the Ulefone Armor 18 proves advantageous for several reasons. A bigger battery translates to a higher energy reservoir, allowing the device to sustain prolonged usage without requiring frequent recharges. This is particularly beneficial for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day, ensuring that the Ulefone Armor 18 can provide a longer lasting and more dependable power supply.

In a positive development, both the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18 incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Ulefone Armor 18 emerges as the more advanced choice. The Ulefone Armor 18 boasts a Fast Charging capability of 66W, surpassing the Doogee S99 33W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Ulefone Armor 18 as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Ulefone Armor 18 ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Doogee S99 and Ulefone Armor 18, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Doogee S99

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Ulefone Armor 18

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Doogee S99

Doogee S99

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Doogee S99 has better overall performance than Ulefone Armor 18, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Doogee S99 has a very similar overall performance to Ulefone Armor 18, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Ulefone Armor 18

Ulefone Armor 18

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Ulefone Armor 18 has better overall performance than Doogee S99, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Doogee S99

Doogee S99

Amazon
Ulefone Armor 18

Ulefone Armor 18

Amazon