Motorola Moto G64y

Motorola Moto G64y

Dual Setup

180 gram

6000 mAh

Android 14

6.5" (Inch)

4GB RAM

ZTE Blade V30

ZTE Blade V30

Quad Setup

193 gram

5000 mAh

Android 11

6.67" (Inch)

4GB RAM

Announced

Date

June 2024

September 2021

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

V9030

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 11

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

MyOS 11

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE

5.0, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

164 x 74 x 8.0 mm

165.8 x 77.8 x 8.9 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

180 g

193 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Plastic

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, White, Blue

Black, Blue

Official available body color options.

Score

75
75

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

Unisoc Tiger T618

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

IMG BXM-8-256

Mali G52 MP2

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

95
95

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

4GB

4GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

128GB

128GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.5"

6.67"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2400 pixels

1080 x 2400 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~405 ppi density, 120Hz

20:9 ratio, (~395 ppi density)

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

6000 mAh

5000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 33W

Fast charging 18W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Dual Setup

Quad Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 0.61µm, OIS, PDAF

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚, 1.12µm, AF

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 16mm

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Macro) 5 MP, f/2.4

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

16 MP, f/2.4, 1.0µm

16 MP, f/2.0

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

85
100

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack, Stereo Speaker

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the side)

Fingerprint (at the side)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Yes, A-GPS

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
90

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $150

~ $210

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €140

~ €200

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30 share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30 becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Motorola Moto G64y outshines the ZTE Blade V30, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~405, the Motorola Moto G64y surpasses the ZTE Blade V30, which boasts ~395 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Motorola Moto G64y elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the ZTE Blade V30.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30 share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the Motorola Moto G64y and the ZTE Blade V30, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the ZTE Blade V30 with 60Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Motorola Moto G64y with 120Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

Comparing Motorola Moto G64y equipped with 5G features to ZTE Blade V30 with only 4G capabilities highlights a distinct advantage for Motorola Moto G64y. The incorporation of 5G technology positions Motorola Moto G64y as a more future proof device, offering faster data speeds and improved connectivity. In contrast, the limited 4G capabilities of ZTE Blade V30 may result in a comparatively slower and less efficient network experience. Consequently in this context, Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior option, providing a more modern and technologically advanced mobile experience compared to ZTE Blade V30.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30 are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Motorola Moto G64y nor ZTE Blade V30 holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Motorola Moto G64y is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.2, surpassing the ZTE Blade V30, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.0. This condition gives the Motorola Moto G64y a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.2 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.0. Therefore, the Motorola Moto G64y is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the ZTE Blade V30.

Leveraging NFC technology, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior choice over the ZTE Blade V30 due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the ZTE Blade V30. The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the ZTE Blade V30 hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Motorola Moto G64y enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Motorola Moto G64y is equipped with 4GB of RAM, while the ZTE Blade V30 offers a range of 4GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Motorola Moto G64y presents a range of 128GB of internal memory storage, while ZTE Blade V30 offers a 128GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Differing from the Motorola Moto G64y, the ZTE Blade V30 stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Motorola Moto G64y, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Motorola Moto G64y adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 processor coupled with the IMG BXM-8-256. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Motorola Moto G64y may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Motorola Moto G64y sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, ZTE Blade V30 is equipped with entry-level hardware, featuring the Unisoc Tiger T618 processor and Mali G52 MP2. While not tailored for hardcore gaming enthusiasts, this device still holds its ground for casual gaming experiences. The combination of the Unisoc Tiger T618 and Mali G52 MP2 allows the ZTE Blade V30 to handle less graphics intensive games smoothly and efficiently. However, its technical specifications suggest that it might struggle with the demands of high-end, resource intensive gaming. Nevertheless, for users looking for a budget friendly smartphone that can handle everyday tasks and provide a decent gaming experience at lower to mid-level graphic settings, the ZTE Blade V30 remains a viable and cost effective option.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30 may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30 is likely to be comparable.

To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Motorola Moto G64y is equipped with a 6.5" screen, slightly smaller than the ZTE Blade V30, which boasts a 6.67" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The ZTE Blade V30 marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the ZTE Blade V30 that only comes with 60Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Motorola Moto G64y translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

Motorola Moto G64y appears to be in for some tough competition from the ZTE Blade V30. While the Motorola Moto G64y settles for a Dual Setup, the ZTE Blade V30 takes things up a notch with its impressive Quad Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the ZTE Blade V30 promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Motorola Moto G64y Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the ZTE Blade V30 in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Motorola Moto G64y introduces a 50 MP camera, while the ZTE Blade V30 boasts an impressive 64 MP. In this aspect, the ZTE Blade V30 holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Motorola Moto G64y. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the ZTE Blade V30, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

When look on to front camera features of the Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 16 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30 stand on equal footing with an 16 MP configuration.

Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the Motorola Moto G64y stands out as more powerful than the ZTE Blade V30, primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Motorola Moto G64y, a feature absent in the ZTE Blade V30. OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the ZTE Blade V30 may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The Motorola Moto G64y integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Motorola Moto G64y surpasses the ZTE Blade V30. The Motorola Moto G64y boasts a substantial 6000 mAh battery, while the ZTE Blade V30 falls slightly behind with a 5000 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Motorola Moto G64y as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Motorola Moto G64y is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the ZTE Blade V30.

In a positive turn of events, both the Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30 come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior choice. While the ZTE Blade V30 offers a respectable 18W Fast Charging, the Motorola Moto G64y outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 33W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Motorola Moto G64y as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Motorola Moto G64y provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Motorola Moto G64y and ZTE Blade V30, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Low quality body material used
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Motorola Moto G64y

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 95
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

ZTE Blade V30

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 100
Performance : 95
Memory : 100
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 90
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Motorola Moto G64y

Motorola Moto G64y

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Motorola Moto G64y has better overall performance than ZTE Blade V30, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Motorola Moto G64y has a very similar overall performance to ZTE Blade V30, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

ZTE Blade V30

ZTE Blade V30

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that ZTE Blade V30 has better overall performance than Motorola Moto G64y, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Motorola Moto G64y

Motorola Moto G64y

Amazon
ZTE Blade V30

ZTE Blade V30

Amazon