Motorola Moto G64y

Motorola Moto G64y

Dual Setup

180 gram

6000 mAh

Android 14

6.5" (Inch)

4GB RAM

Ulefone Armor X10 Pro

Ulefone Armor X10 Pro

Dual Setup

256 gram

5180 mAh

Android 11

5.45" (Inch)

4GB RAM

Announced

Date

June 2024

March 2022

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

Unknown

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 11

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

Android Stock UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE

5.0, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

164 x 74 x 8.0 mm

158.2 x 76.7 x 14.6 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

180 g

256 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810G

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, White, Blue

Black

Official available body color options.

Score

75
100

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

Mediatek Helio P22

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

IMG BXM-8-256

PowerVR GE8320

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

95
95

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

4GB

4GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

128GB

64GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
95

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.5"

5.45"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2400 pixels

720 x 1440 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~405 ppi density, 120Hz

18:9 ratio, (~295 ppi density)

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

6000 mAh

5180 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 33W

-

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
85

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Dual Setup

Dual Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 0.61µm, OIS, PDAF

(Main) 20 MP, f/1.8, 26mm, 1/2.78", 1.0µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚, 1.12µm, AF

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

16 MP, f/2.4, 1.0µm

5 MP, f/2.2

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

85
85

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack, Stereo Speaker

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the side)

-

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
80

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $150

~ $160

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €140

~ €150

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The Motorola Moto G64y stands as a conventional smartphone, whereas the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro emerges as a rugged phone designed to outperform in challenging conditions. When evaluating build quality for extreme conditions, the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro stands out as the superior choice.

In contrast to the standard design of the Motorola Moto G64y, the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro boasts a reinforced and robust build, featuring durable materials that enhance its resistance to impacts, drops, water, dust, and shocks. This rugged design ensures that the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro excels in environments where the Motorola Moto G64y may falter, providing users with a durable and reliable device capable of withstanding the rigors of harsh conditions. Whether facing adverse weather or demanding outdoor scenarios, the build quality of the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro positions it as the preferred option for users seeking a phone that exceeds conventional limits, ensuring durability and functionality in extreme conditions.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Motorola Moto G64y and Ulefone Armor X10 Pro.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Motorola Moto G64y outshines the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~405, the Motorola Moto G64y surpasses the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, which boasts ~295 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Motorola Moto G64y elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Motorola Moto G64y and Ulefone Armor X10 Pro share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Motorola Moto G64y and Ulefone Armor X10 Pro.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the Motorola Moto G64y and the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro with 60Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Motorola Moto G64y with 120Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

Comparing Motorola Moto G64y equipped with 5G features to Ulefone Armor X10 Pro with only 4G capabilities highlights a distinct advantage for Motorola Moto G64y. The incorporation of 5G technology positions Motorola Moto G64y as a more future proof device, offering faster data speeds and improved connectivity. In contrast, the limited 4G capabilities of Ulefone Armor X10 Pro may result in a comparatively slower and less efficient network experience. Consequently in this context, Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior option, providing a more modern and technologically advanced mobile experience compared to Ulefone Armor X10 Pro.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Motorola Moto G64y and Ulefone Armor X10 Pro are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Motorola Moto G64y nor Ulefone Armor X10 Pro holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Motorola Moto G64y is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.2, surpassing the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.0. This condition gives the Motorola Moto G64y a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.2 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.0. Therefore, the Motorola Moto G64y is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro.

Now, Motorola Moto G64y and Ulefone Armor X10 Pro stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Motorola Moto G64y is equipped with 4GB of RAM, while the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro offers a range of 4GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior choice over Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, evident in its internal memory configuration of 128GB, surpassing the 64GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Motorola Moto G64y higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Motorola Moto G64y adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 processor coupled with the IMG BXM-8-256. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Motorola Moto G64y may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Motorola Moto G64y sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, Ulefone Armor X10 Pro is equipped with entry-level hardware, featuring the Mediatek Helio P22 processor and PowerVR GE8320. While not tailored for hardcore gaming enthusiasts, this device still holds its ground for casual gaming experiences. The combination of the Mediatek Helio P22 and PowerVR GE8320 allows the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro to handle less graphics intensive games smoothly and efficiently. However, its technical specifications suggest that it might struggle with the demands of high-end, resource intensive gaming. Nevertheless, for users looking for a budget friendly smartphone that can handle everyday tasks and provide a decent gaming experience at lower to mid-level graphic settings, the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro remains a viable and cost effective option.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Motorola Moto G64y and Ulefone Armor X10 Pro may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Motorola Moto G64y and Ulefone Armor X10 Pro is likely to be comparable.

For an optimal gaming experience, the Motorola Moto G64y distinguishes itself with its notably larger 6.5" screen, surpassing the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, which features a comparatively smaller 5.45" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro that only comes with 60Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Motorola Moto G64y translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Motorola Moto G64y and Ulefone Armor X10 Pro share a common ground, utilizing a Dual Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Motorola Moto G64y and Ulefone Armor X10 Pro provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as a standout against the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, showcasing an impressive 50 MP camera, while the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro only comes with 20 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Motorola Moto G64y, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Motorola Moto G64y and Ulefone Armor X10 Pro appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Motorola Moto G64y and Ulefone Armor X10 Pro. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Motorola Moto G64y outshines the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, boasting a significantly higher 16 MP front camera compared to the 5 MP front camera on the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the Motorola Moto G64y stands out as more powerful than the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Motorola Moto G64y, a feature absent in the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro. OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The Motorola Moto G64y integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Motorola Moto G64y surpasses the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro. The Motorola Moto G64y boasts a substantial 6000 mAh battery, while the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro falls slightly behind with a 5180 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Motorola Moto G64y as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Motorola Moto G64y is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro.

Upon closer examination, the Motorola Moto G64y stands out with its Fast Charging 33W feature, a capability absent in the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro. This distinction positions the Motorola Moto G64y as a more favorable choice for users who prioritize rapid charging times. The 33W fast charging capability enables the Motorola Moto G64y to charge more quickly than the Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, providing users with a convenient and efficient charging experience. In scenarios where time is of the essence, the Motorola Moto G64y fast charging feature becomes a notable advantage, making it a preferable option for those seeking expedited charging without compromising on device performance.

Security Features

At the security features, Motorola Moto G64y demonstrates superiority over Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, primarily owing to its incorporation of a dedicated biometric sensor designed to enhance the device security. This contrasts sharply with Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, which lacks a dedicated biometric sensor, resulting in all security measures remaining at a standard level. The absence of a specialized security sensor on Ulefone Armor X10 Pro places it at a disadvantage, as Motorola Moto G64y provides users with an elevated and secure means of device access and authentication through its dedicated biometric feature.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Expandable storage with external memory card

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Low quality body material used
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • No fast charging feature supported
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Relatively small internal memory capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Motorola Moto G64y

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 95
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Ulefone Armor X10 Pro

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 95
Memory : 95
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 85
Sensor : 80
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Motorola Moto G64y

Motorola Moto G64y

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Motorola Moto G64y has better overall performance than Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Motorola Moto G64y has a very similar overall performance to Ulefone Armor X10 Pro, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Ulefone Armor X10 Pro

Ulefone Armor X10 Pro

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Ulefone Armor X10 Pro has better overall performance than Motorola Moto G64y, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Motorola Moto G64y

Motorola Moto G64y

Amazon
Ulefone Armor X10 Pro

Ulefone Armor X10 Pro

Amazon