Durability

Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro.

In terms of screen protection performance, the Motorola Moto G64y appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Redmi Note 11 Pro distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Redmi Note 11 Pro not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Motorola Moto G64y outshines the Redmi Note 11 Pro, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~405, the Motorola Moto G64y surpasses the Redmi Note 11 Pro, which boasts ~395 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Motorola Moto G64y elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Redmi Note 11 Pro.

In the realm of display hardware, the Motorola Moto G64y is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Redmi Note 11 Pro boasts a brilliant Super AMOLED display. The advantages of Super AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Redmi Note 11 Pro displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Motorola Moto G64y and the Redmi Note 11 Pro align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Motorola Moto G64y and the Redmi Note 11 Pro find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

Comparing Motorola Moto G64y equipped with 5G features to Redmi Note 11 Pro with only 4G capabilities highlights a distinct advantage for Motorola Moto G64y. The incorporation of 5G technology positions Motorola Moto G64y as a more future proof device, offering faster data speeds and improved connectivity. In contrast, the limited 4G capabilities of Redmi Note 11 Pro may result in a comparatively slower and less efficient network experience. Consequently in this context, Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior option, providing a more modern and technologically advanced mobile experience compared to Redmi Note 11 Pro.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Motorola Moto G64y nor Redmi Note 11 Pro holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Motorola Moto G64y is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.2, surpassing the Redmi Note 11 Pro, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.1. This condition gives the Motorola Moto G64y a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.2 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.1. Therefore, the Motorola Moto G64y is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro.

Now, Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Motorola Moto G64y offers a RAM configuration of 4GB, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro boasts a more substantial 6GB / 8GB RAM range. Clearly, the Redmi Note 11 Pro holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Motorola Moto G64y presents a range of 128GB of internal memory storage, while Redmi Note 11 Pro offers a 64GB / 128GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Motorola Moto G64y adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 processor coupled with the IMG BXM-8-256. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Motorola Moto G64y may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Motorola Moto G64y sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, Redmi Note 11 Pro features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Mediatek Helio G96 processor and Mali-G57 MC2. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Mediatek Helio G96 and Mali-G57 MC2 tandem enables the Redmi Note 11 Pro to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Motorola Moto G64y comes with less RAM than Redmi Note 11 Pro. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Redmi Note 11 Pro holds an advantage over the Motorola Moto G64y due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Redmi Note 11 Pro, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Motorola Moto G64y is equipped with a 6.5" screen, slightly smaller than the Redmi Note 11 Pro, which boasts a 6.67" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The Redmi Note 11 Pro marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

Motorola Moto G64y appears to be in for some tough competition from the Redmi Note 11 Pro. While the Motorola Moto G64y settles for a Dual Setup, the Redmi Note 11 Pro takes things up a notch with its impressive Quad Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Redmi Note 11 Pro promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Motorola Moto G64y Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Redmi Note 11 Pro in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Motorola Moto G64y introduces a 50 MP camera, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro boasts an impressive 108 MP. In this aspect, the Redmi Note 11 Pro holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Motorola Moto G64y. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Redmi Note 11 Pro, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

When look on to front camera features of the Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 16 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro stand on equal footing with an 16 MP configuration.

Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the Motorola Moto G64y stands out as more powerful than the Redmi Note 11 Pro, primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Motorola Moto G64y, a feature absent in the Redmi Note 11 Pro. OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the Redmi Note 11 Pro may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The Motorola Moto G64y integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Motorola Moto G64y surpasses the Redmi Note 11 Pro. The Motorola Moto G64y boasts a substantial 6000 mAh battery, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro falls slightly behind with a 5000 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Motorola Moto G64y as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Motorola Moto G64y is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro.

In a positive development, both the Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Redmi Note 11 Pro emerges as the more advanced choice. The Redmi Note 11 Pro boasts a Fast Charging capability of 67W, surpassing the Motorola Moto G64y 33W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Redmi Note 11 Pro as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Redmi Note 11 Pro ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Motorola Moto G64y and Redmi Note 11 Pro, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.