Compare Tools :
Date
June 2024
November 2023
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
CTS8000BKH
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 14
Android 13
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
Android Stock UI
Android Stock UI
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Nano SIM
Dual SIM, Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
( ? )
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.2, A2DP, LE
( ? )
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
164 x 74 x 8.0 mm
168 x 77.2 x 11.3 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
180 g
252 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Plastic
Plastic
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Black, White, Blue
Black, Brown
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
MediaTek Dimensity 7025
MediaTek Dimensity 700
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
IMG BXM-8-256
Mali-G57
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
4GB
12GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
128GB
256GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
MicroSDXC
MicroSDXC
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
6.5"
6.67"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
IPS LCD
IPS LCD
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
1080 x 2400 pixels
1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~405 ppi density, 120Hz
~395 ppi density
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
6000 mAh
4800 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 33W
( ? )
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Dual Setup
Triple Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 0.61µm, OIS, PDAF
(Main) 48 MP, AF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚, 1.12µm, AF
(Macro) 0.3 MP
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
-
(Depth) 0.3 MP
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
16 MP, f/2.4, 1.0µm
24 MP
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
3.5mm jack, Stereo Speaker
( ? )
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
Fingerprint (at the side)
Fingerprint (at the side)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
Yes
( ? )
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $150
~ $250
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €140
~ €240
Price in Euros (EUR).
Motorola Moto G64y and Philips S8000 share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Motorola Moto G64y and Philips S8000 becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.
Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Motorola Moto G64y and Philips S8000.
In the domain of visual quality, the Motorola Moto G64y outshines the Philips S8000, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~405, the Motorola Moto G64y surpasses the Philips S8000, which boasts ~395 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.
A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Motorola Moto G64y elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Philips S8000.
In the realm of display panel technology, the Motorola Moto G64y and Philips S8000 share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Motorola Moto G64y and Philips S8000.
When comparing the refresh rate time of the Motorola Moto G64y and the Philips S8000, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Philips S8000 with 60Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Motorola Moto G64y with 120Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.
If we compare the Motorola Moto G64y and Philips S8000, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Motorola Moto G64y and Philips S8000 on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.
Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Motorola Moto G64y and Philips S8000. First, the Motorola Moto G64y features Wi-Fi 5, while Philips S8000 utilizes by Wi-Fi 2 technology. From a technical standpoint, Motorola Moto G64y holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 5 offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 2. Consequently, the Motorola Moto G64y ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Philips S8000.
At this moment, the choice between devices that offer superior Bluetooth features is contingent on the fact that the comparison data is not yet complete. To make an informed decision, it's crucial to await comprehensive data that will shed light on the complete range of Bluetooth capabilities each device possesses.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Examining the specification data, Motorola Moto G64y offers a RAM configuration of 4GB, while the Philips S8000 boasts a more substantial 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the Philips S8000 holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Referencing the specifications, Motorola Moto G64y offers internal storage options ranging from 128GB, while Philips S8000 surpasses this with an impressive 256GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Philips S8000, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Philips S8000 stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, The Motorola Moto G64y adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 processor coupled with the IMG BXM-8-256. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Motorola Moto G64y may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Motorola Moto G64y sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.
Next, Philips S8000 stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable MediaTek Dimensity 700 processor and the Mali-G57. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The MediaTek Dimensity 700 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Mali-G57 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Philips S8000 excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Philips S8000 emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.
Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Motorola Moto G64y comes with less RAM than Philips S8000. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Philips S8000 holds an advantage over the Motorola Moto G64y due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Philips S8000, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.
To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Motorola Moto G64y is equipped with a 6.5" screen, slightly smaller than the Philips S8000, which boasts a 6.67" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The Philips S8000 marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.
Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Philips S8000 that only comes with 60Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Motorola Moto G64y translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.
Motorola Moto G64y appears to be in for some tough competition from the Philips S8000. While the Motorola Moto G64y settles for a Dual Setup, the Philips S8000 takes things up a notch with its impressive Triple Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Philips S8000 promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Motorola Moto G64y Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Philips S8000 in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.
Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as a standout against the Philips S8000, showcasing an impressive 50 MP camera, while the Philips S8000 only comes with 48 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.
Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Motorola Moto G64y, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.
When discussing front camera features, the Motorola Moto G64y and Philips S8000 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Motorola Moto G64y and Philips S8000. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Philips S8000 holds a distinct advantage over the Motorola Moto G64y. The Philips S8000 boasts a larger 24 MP front camera, while the Motorola Moto G64y features a 16 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Philips S8000 provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.
Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the Motorola Moto G64y stands out as more powerful than the Philips S8000, primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Motorola Moto G64y, a feature absent in the Philips S8000. OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the Philips S8000 may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The Motorola Moto G64y integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.
Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Motorola Moto G64y surpasses the Philips S8000. The Motorola Moto G64y boasts a substantial 6000 mAh battery, while the Philips S8000 falls slightly behind with a 4800 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Motorola Moto G64y as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Motorola Moto G64y is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Philips S8000.
Due to the information regarding the fast charging feature is still unknown. A complete dataset is essential for evaluating the efficacy and efficiency of the fast charging technology in question. By patiently awaiting the full set of data, we can gain a more accurate understanding of the device's charging capabilities, enabling a more informed and nuanced assessment of its overall charging performance.
Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Motorola Moto G64y and Philips S8000, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Motorola Moto G64y has better overall performance than Philips S8000, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Motorola Moto G64y has a very similar overall performance to Philips S8000, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Philips S8000 has better overall performance than Motorola Moto G64y, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.
