Motorola Moto G64y

Motorola Moto G64y

Dual Setup

180 gram

6000 mAh

Android 14

6.5" (Inch)

4GB RAM

Google Pixel 5A 5G

Google Pixel 5A 5G

Dual Setup

183 gram

4680 mAh

Android 12

6.34" (Inch)

6GB RAM

Announced

Date

June 2024

August 2021

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

G1F8F / G4S1M

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 12

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

Android Stock UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G / CDMA / EVDO

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Nano SIM

Nano SIM / eSIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band, DLNA

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE

5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

164 x 74 x 8.0 mm

154.9 x 73.7 x 7.6 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

180 g

183 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Aluminum, IP67 Rated

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, White, Blue

Black

Official available body color options.

Score

75
100

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

IMG BXM-8-256

Adreno 620

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

95
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

4GB

6GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

128GB

128GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.5"

6.34"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

OLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2400 pixels

1080 x 2400 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~405 ppi density, 120Hz

20:9 ratio, (~415 ppi density), HDR, Corning Gorilla Glass 3

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

6000 mAh

4680 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 33W

Fast charging 18W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Dual Setup

Dual Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 0.61µm, OIS, PDAF

(Main) 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚, 1.12µm, AF

(Ultrawide) 16 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 1.0µm

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

16 MP, f/2.4, 1.0µm

8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm, 1.12µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@60fps / 1080p@240fps, gyro-EIS

Available video recording support and features.

Score

85
85

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack, Stereo Speaker

3.5mm jack, Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the side)

Fingerprint (at the rear)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $150

~ $600

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €140

~ €520

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The build quality of the Google Pixel 5A 5G surpasses that of the Motorola Moto G64y, owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Google Pixel 5A 5G features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Motorola Moto G64y. The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Google Pixel 5A 5G aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Motorola Moto G64y plastic construction.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G.

In terms of screen protection performance, the Motorola Moto G64y appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Google Pixel 5A 5G distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Google Pixel 5A 5G not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Motorola Moto G64y with its ~405 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Google Pixel 5A 5G, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~415. The Google Pixel 5A 5G gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Google Pixel 5A 5G, its elevated ppi of ~415 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Motorola Moto G64y.

In the realm of display hardware, the Motorola Moto G64y is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Google Pixel 5A 5G boasts a brilliant OLED display. The advantages of OLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Google Pixel 5A 5G displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the Motorola Moto G64y and the Google Pixel 5A 5G, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Google Pixel 5A 5G with 60Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Motorola Moto G64y with 120Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Motorola Moto G64y nor Google Pixel 5A 5G holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Motorola Moto G64y is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.2, surpassing the Google Pixel 5A 5G, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.0. This condition gives the Motorola Moto G64y a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.2 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.0. Therefore, the Motorola Moto G64y is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Google Pixel 5A 5G.

Now, Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Motorola Moto G64y offers a RAM configuration of 4GB, while the Google Pixel 5A 5G boasts a more substantial 6GB RAM range. Clearly, the Google Pixel 5A 5G holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Motorola Moto G64y presents a range of 128GB of internal memory storage, while Google Pixel 5A 5G offers a 128GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Motorola Moto G64y adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 processor coupled with the IMG BXM-8-256. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Motorola Moto G64y may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Motorola Moto G64y sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, Google Pixel 5A 5G features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G processor and Adreno 620. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and Adreno 620 tandem enables the Google Pixel 5A 5G to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Motorola Moto G64y comes with less RAM than Google Pixel 5A 5G. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Google Pixel 5A 5G holds an advantage over the Motorola Moto G64y due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Google Pixel 5A 5G, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

When it comes to optimizing the gaming experience on mobile phones, screen size plays a crucial role in determining visual clarity and immersion. In the context of the Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G, the Motorola Moto G64y boasts a slightly larger 6.5" screen compared to the Google Pixel 5A 5G is 6.34" display. This slight difference in size can contribute to a more immersive gaming experience for users. A larger screen provides a more expansive field of view, allowing gamers to perceive in game details with greater clarity and precision. This enhanced visibility becomes particularly important in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential. Additionally, a larger screen can make gaming sessions more enjoyable by offering a more engaging and immersive visual experience.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Google Pixel 5A 5G that only comes with 60Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Motorola Moto G64y translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G share a common ground, utilizing a Dual Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as a standout against the Google Pixel 5A 5G, showcasing an impressive 50 MP camera, while the Google Pixel 5A 5G only comes with 12 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Motorola Moto G64y, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Motorola Moto G64y outshines the Google Pixel 5A 5G, boasting a significantly higher 16 MP front camera compared to the 8 MP front camera on the Google Pixel 5A 5G. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

On video recording capabilities, both the Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G stand out as excellent choices, sharing the notable feature of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). This technology designed to minimize the impact of shaky movements or vibrations when capturing videos. It employs sensors and actuators to detect and counteract any unintended motion, resulting in smoother and more stable video footage. This feature is particularly beneficial for users who engage in handheld video recording, especially in dynamic or unpredictable environments. The inclusion of OIS in both the Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G ensures a high quality video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and steady footage even in challenging conditions.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Motorola Moto G64y surpasses the Google Pixel 5A 5G. The Motorola Moto G64y boasts a substantial 6000 mAh battery, while the Google Pixel 5A 5G falls slightly behind with a 4680 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Motorola Moto G64y as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Motorola Moto G64y is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Google Pixel 5A 5G.

In a positive turn of events, both the Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Motorola Moto G64y emerges as the superior choice. While the Google Pixel 5A 5G offers a respectable 18W Fast Charging, the Motorola Moto G64y outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 33W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Motorola Moto G64y as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Motorola Moto G64y provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Motorola Moto G64y and Google Pixel 5A 5G, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Low quality body material used
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Motorola Moto G64y

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 95
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Google Pixel 5A 5G

Build Quality : 100
Display : 100
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Motorola Moto G64y

Motorola Moto G64y

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Motorola Moto G64y has better overall performance than Google Pixel 5A 5G, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Motorola Moto G64y has a very similar overall performance to Google Pixel 5A 5G, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Google Pixel 5A 5G

Google Pixel 5A 5G

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Google Pixel 5A 5G has better overall performance than Motorola Moto G64y, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Motorola Moto G64y

Motorola Moto G64y

Amazon
Google Pixel 5A 5G

Google Pixel 5A 5G

Amazon