Lenovo Tab Plus

Lenovo Tab Plus

Single Setup

650 gram

8600 mAh

Android 14

11.5" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Vivo V23 5G

Vivo V23 5G

Triple Setup

181 gram

4200 mAh

Android 12

6.44" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Announced

Date

June 2024

January 2022

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

V2130

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 12

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

FuntouchOS 12

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

-

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

-

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

70
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE

5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

268.3 x 174.2 x 13.5 mm

157.2 x 72.4 x 7.4 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

650 g

181 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Plastic + Glass Case

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Silver

Black, Gold

Official available body color options.

Score

75
85

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Helio G99

MediaTek Dimensity 920

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G57 MC2

Mali-G68 MC4

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB

8GB / 12GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

128GB / 256GB

128GB / 256GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

11.5"

6.44"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

AMOLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1200 x 2000 pixels

1080 x 2400 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~203 ppi density, 90Hz

20:9 ratio, (~409 ppi density), 90Hz, HDR10+, Schott Xensation Up

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

8600 mAh

4200 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 45W

Fast charging 44W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Single Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

8 MP, AF

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

-

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm, 1/4.0", 1.12µm

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Dual Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

8 MP

(Main) 50 MP, f/2.0, AF

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 720p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

80
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

-

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
85

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

-

Fingerprint (under display)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

-

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

80
90

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $290

~ $420

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €280

~ €380

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Lenovo Tab Plus and Vivo V23 5G share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Lenovo Tab Plus and Vivo V23 5G becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

While the Lenovo Tab Plus features with a standard cover, the Vivo V23 5G distinguishes itself by elevating its design with a more luxurious glass cover, adding an extra layer of sophistication and durability. The incorporation of a glass cover sets the Vivo V23 5G apart, not only in terms of aesthetics but also in the tactile and visual experience it offers. Beyond the surface level appeal, the glass cover enhances the device durability, providing robust yet stylish protection. This distinction makes the Vivo V23 5G more intriguing than the Lenovo Tab Plus, as it caters to individuals seeking a combination of elegance and resilience in their device.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Lenovo Tab Plus with its ~203 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Vivo V23 5G, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~409. The Vivo V23 5G gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Vivo V23 5G, its elevated ppi of ~409 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Lenovo Tab Plus.

In the realm of display hardware, the Lenovo Tab Plus is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Vivo V23 5G boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Vivo V23 5G displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Lenovo Tab Plus and the Vivo V23 5G align with their 90Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Lenovo Tab Plus and the Vivo V23 5G find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

Comparing the Lenovo Tab Plus that which lacks mobile SIM support, with the Vivo V23 5G boasting 5G capabilities, reveals a notable disparity. The absence of mobile SIM support in the Lenovo Tab Plus places it at a distinct disadvantage, especially for those reliant on seamless connectivity through mobile networks. In situations where users prioritize mobile SIM features, the Vivo V23 5G emerges as the preferred choice.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Lenovo Tab Plus and Vivo V23 5G are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Lenovo Tab Plus nor Vivo V23 5G holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Lenovo Tab Plus and Vivo V23 5G both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.2 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Lenovo Tab Plus and the Vivo V23 5G, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Unfortunately, both the Lenovo Tab Plus and Vivo V23 5G lack NFC features, resulting in a tie between them. The absence of NFC constrains these devices in terms of modern connectivity and functionality. NFC serves as a wireless technology that enables seamless data exchange between devices in close proximity, offering diverse applications such as contactless payments, swift file sharing, and simplified pairing with other compatible devices. Consequently, users of Lenovo Tab Plus and Vivo V23 5G may encounter limitations in fully exploiting the potential for hassle free connectivity.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Lenovo Tab Plus offers a RAM configuration of 8GB, while the Vivo V23 5G boasts a more substantial 8GB / 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the Vivo V23 5G holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Lenovo Tab Plus presents a range of 128GB / 256GB of internal memory storage, while Vivo V23 5G offers a 128GB / 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Lenovo Tab Plus and Vivo V23 5G. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Differing from the Lenovo Tab Plus, the Vivo V23 5G stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Lenovo Tab Plus, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Lenovo Tab Plus boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Helio G99 processor and Mali-G57 MC2, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Helio G99 and Mali-G57 MC2 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Lenovo Tab Plus to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Vivo V23 5G stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable MediaTek Dimensity 920 processor and the Mali-G68 MC4. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The MediaTek Dimensity 920 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Mali-G68 MC4 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Vivo V23 5G excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Vivo V23 5G emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Lenovo Tab Plus comes with less RAM than Vivo V23 5G. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Vivo V23 5G holds an advantage over the Lenovo Tab Plus due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Vivo V23 5G, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

For an optimal gaming experience, the Lenovo Tab Plus distinguishes itself with its notably larger 11.5" screen, surpassing the Vivo V23 5G, which features a comparatively smaller 6.44" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Lenovo Tab Plus and Vivo V23 5G stand on equal footing with identical 90Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 90Hz refresh rate shared by Lenovo Tab Plus and Vivo V23 5G ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Lenovo Tab Plus and Vivo V23 5G, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

Lenovo Tab Plus appears to be in for some tough competition from the Vivo V23 5G. While the Lenovo Tab Plus settles for a Single Setup, the Vivo V23 5G takes things up a notch with its impressive Triple Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Vivo V23 5G promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Lenovo Tab Plus Single Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Vivo V23 5G in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Lenovo Tab Plus introduces a 8 MP camera, while the Vivo V23 5G boasts an impressive 64 MP. In this aspect, the Vivo V23 5G holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Lenovo Tab Plus. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Vivo V23 5G, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

Examining the front camera features, it's evident that the Vivo V23 5G outshines the Lenovo Tab Plus due to its Dual Setup, providing users with a more expansive and versatile photography experience. In contrast, the Lenovo Tab Plus is equipped with a Single Setup front camera, limiting its range of capabilities in comparison to the Vivo V23 5G. The Dual Setup configuration on the Vivo V23 5G not only enhances the potential for creative and high quality selfies but also offers users a broader set of options for capturing different perspectives. This notable difference in front camera setups positions the Vivo V23 5G as a more advanced and feature rich choice for those who prioritize a comprehensive front camera experience.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Vivo V23 5G holds a distinct advantage over the Lenovo Tab Plus. The Vivo V23 5G boasts a larger 50 MP front camera, while the Lenovo Tab Plus features a 8 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Vivo V23 5G provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

After careful examination of the front camera features, it becomes evident that the Vivo V23 5G holds a distinct advantage over the Lenovo Tab Plus. The significant disparity lies in the main features of the front facing camera, where the Vivo V23 5G is equipped with dedicated ultrawide camera lenses, a feature absent in the Lenovo Tab Plus. This particular addition on the Vivo V23 5G contributes to a more versatile and expansive selfie-taking experience, allowing users to capture a broader field of view. In contrast, the absence of dedicated ultrawide lenses on the Lenovo Tab Plus may limit its capacity to offer a similarly immersive and dynamic front camera performance. As a result, the Vivo V23 5G emerges as the superior choice for individuals prioritizing advanced front camera features.

Sadly, the both of Lenovo Tab Plus and Vivo V23 5G are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Lenovo Tab Plus and Vivo V23 5G may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Lenovo Tab Plus and the Vivo V23 5G becomes a notable advantage. The Lenovo Tab Plus, equipped with an impressive 8600 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the Vivo V23 5G 4200 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Lenovo Tab Plus as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Lenovo Tab Plus robust 8600 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.

In a positive turn of events, both the Lenovo Tab Plus and Vivo V23 5G come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Lenovo Tab Plus emerges as the superior choice. While the Vivo V23 5G offers a respectable 44W Fast Charging, the Lenovo Tab Plus outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 45W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Lenovo Tab Plus as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Lenovo Tab Plus provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

At the security features, it becomes evident that the Lenovo Tab Plus falls short in comparison to the Vivo V23 5G. The Lenovo Tab Plus lacks any dedicated biometric sensor, a notable distinction from the Vivo V23 5G, where a dedicated biometric sensor is present. This disparity underscores that, in terms of security, the Vivo V23 5G holds a distinct advantage over the Lenovo Tab Plus. The absence of a dedicated biometric sensor on the Lenovo Tab Plus emphasizes the Vivo V23 5G superior security features, offering users a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Multiple front camera options
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Mobile network not available
  • No SIM Card function supported
  • Average WLAN connection speed

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Average sound & audio quality

Benchmark

Point Result

Lenovo Tab Plus

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 80
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 70
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 80
Audio : 95

Vivo V23 5G

Build Quality : 85
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 90
Audio : 85

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Lenovo Tab Plus

Lenovo Tab Plus

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Lenovo Tab Plus has better overall performance than Vivo V23 5G, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Lenovo Tab Plus has a very similar overall performance to Vivo V23 5G, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Vivo V23 5G

Vivo V23 5G

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo V23 5G has better overall performance than Lenovo Tab Plus, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Lenovo Tab Plus

Lenovo Tab Plus

Amazon
Vivo V23 5G

Vivo V23 5G

Amazon