Compare Tools :
Date
June 2024
May 2023
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
Unknown
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 14
Android 13
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
Android Stock UI
Android Stock UI
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
-
2G / 3G / 4G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
-
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.2, A2DP, LE
5.0, A2DP, LE
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
268.3 x 174.2 x 13.5 mm
181.8 x 85.1 x 17.5mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
650 g
380 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Plastic
Plastic, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810G
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Silver
Black
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
MediaTek Helio G99
MediaTek Helio G99
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Mali-G57 MC2
Mali-G57 MC2
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
8GB
12GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
128GB / 256GB
256GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
MicroSDXC
MicroSDXC
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
11.5"
6.78"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
IPS LCD
IPS LCD
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
1200 x 2000 pixels
1080 x 2340 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~203 ppi density, 90Hz
~396 ppi density, 90Hz
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
8600 mAh
10200 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 45W
Fast charging 33W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Single Setup
Triple Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
8 MP, AF
(Main) 108 MP, f/1.9, PDAF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
-
(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
-
(Depth) 0.3 MP
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
8 MP
16 MP, f/2.2
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 720p@30fps
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
3.5mm jack
-
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
-
Fingerprint (at the side)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
-
Yes
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $290
~ $410
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €280
~ €400
Price in Euros (EUR).
The Lenovo Tab Plus stands as a conventional smartphone, whereas the Hotwav Cyber X Pro emerges as a rugged phone designed to outperform in challenging conditions. When evaluating build quality for extreme conditions, the Hotwav Cyber X Pro stands out as the superior choice.
In contrast to the standard design of the Lenovo Tab Plus, the Hotwav Cyber X Pro boasts a reinforced and robust build, featuring durable materials that enhance its resistance to impacts, drops, water, dust, and shocks. This rugged design ensures that the Hotwav Cyber X Pro excels in environments where the Lenovo Tab Plus may falter, providing users with a durable and reliable device capable of withstanding the rigors of harsh conditions. Whether facing adverse weather or demanding outdoor scenarios, the build quality of the Hotwav Cyber X Pro positions it as the preferred option for users seeking a phone that exceeds conventional limits, ensuring durability and functionality in extreme conditions.
Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Lenovo Tab Plus and Hotwav Cyber X Pro.
In terms of visual quality performance, the Lenovo Tab Plus with its ~203 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Hotwav Cyber X Pro, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~396. The Hotwav Cyber X Pro gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.
This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Hotwav Cyber X Pro, its elevated ppi of ~396 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Lenovo Tab Plus.
In the realm of display panel technology, the Lenovo Tab Plus and Hotwav Cyber X Pro share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Lenovo Tab Plus and Hotwav Cyber X Pro.
From the screen refresh rate features, the Lenovo Tab Plus and the Hotwav Cyber X Pro align with their 90Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Lenovo Tab Plus and the Hotwav Cyber X Pro find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.
Comparing the Lenovo Tab Plus that which lacks mobile SIM support, with the Hotwav Cyber X Pro boasting 4G capabilities, reveals a notable disparity. The absence of mobile SIM support in the Lenovo Tab Plus places it at a distinct disadvantage, especially for those reliant on seamless connectivity through mobile networks. In situations where users prioritize mobile SIM features, the Hotwav Cyber X Pro emerges as the preferred choice.
Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Lenovo Tab Plus and Hotwav Cyber X Pro are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Lenovo Tab Plus nor Hotwav Cyber X Pro holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Lenovo Tab Plus is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.2, surpassing the Hotwav Cyber X Pro, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.0. This condition gives the Lenovo Tab Plus a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.2 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.0. Therefore, the Lenovo Tab Plus is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Hotwav Cyber X Pro.
From the NFC technology perspective, Lenovo Tab Plus lacks the NFC feature, while the Hotwav Cyber X Pro comes equipped with it, making the Hotwav Cyber X Pro notably superior. The NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless technology facilitating smooth data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Lenovo Tab Plus restricts its capabilities for convenient applications like quick file sharing, contactless payments, and seamless connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. Conversely, the inclusion of NFC in the Hotwav Cyber X Pro enhances its versatility, providing users with an extended range of applications.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Examining the specification data, Lenovo Tab Plus offers a RAM configuration of 8GB, while the Hotwav Cyber X Pro boasts a more substantial 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the Hotwav Cyber X Pro holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Lenovo Tab Plus presents a range of 128GB / 256GB of internal memory storage, while Hotwav Cyber X Pro offers a 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Lenovo Tab Plus and Hotwav Cyber X Pro. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.
Highlighting a notable distinction, the Hotwav Cyber X Pro introduces an interesting feature by incorporating external memory expansion, a capability notably absent in the Lenovo Tab Plus. This feature proves advantageous for users seeking enhanced storage flexibility. With external memory expansion, Hotwav Cyber X Pro users can easily amplify their device storage by adding a compatible external memory card. This becomes particularly beneficial for individuals who require additional space for storing diverse data, be it large files, multimedia content, or extra applications. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to tailor and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, offering a practical solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, The Lenovo Tab Plus boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Helio G99 processor and Mali-G57 MC2, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Helio G99 and Mali-G57 MC2 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Lenovo Tab Plus to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.
Next, Hotwav Cyber X Pro stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable MediaTek Helio G99 processor and the Mali-G57 MC2. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The MediaTek Helio G99 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Mali-G57 MC2 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Hotwav Cyber X Pro excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Hotwav Cyber X Pro emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.
Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Lenovo Tab Plus comes with less RAM than Hotwav Cyber X Pro. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Hotwav Cyber X Pro holds an advantage over the Lenovo Tab Plus due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Hotwav Cyber X Pro, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.
For an optimal gaming experience, the Lenovo Tab Plus distinguishes itself with its notably larger 11.5" screen, surpassing the Hotwav Cyber X Pro, which features a comparatively smaller 6.78" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.
Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Lenovo Tab Plus and Hotwav Cyber X Pro stand on equal footing with identical 90Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 90Hz refresh rate shared by Lenovo Tab Plus and Hotwav Cyber X Pro ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Lenovo Tab Plus and Hotwav Cyber X Pro, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.
Lenovo Tab Plus appears to be in for some tough competition from the Hotwav Cyber X Pro. While the Lenovo Tab Plus settles for a Single Setup, the Hotwav Cyber X Pro takes things up a notch with its impressive Triple Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Hotwav Cyber X Pro promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Lenovo Tab Plus Single Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Hotwav Cyber X Pro in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.
Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Lenovo Tab Plus introduces a 8 MP camera, while the Hotwav Cyber X Pro boasts an impressive 108 MP. In this aspect, the Hotwav Cyber X Pro holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Lenovo Tab Plus. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.
This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Hotwav Cyber X Pro, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.
When discussing front camera features, the Lenovo Tab Plus and Hotwav Cyber X Pro appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Lenovo Tab Plus and Hotwav Cyber X Pro. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Hotwav Cyber X Pro holds a distinct advantage over the Lenovo Tab Plus. The Hotwav Cyber X Pro boasts a larger 16 MP front camera, while the Lenovo Tab Plus features a 8 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Hotwav Cyber X Pro provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.
Sadly, the both of Lenovo Tab Plus and Hotwav Cyber X Pro are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Lenovo Tab Plus and Hotwav Cyber X Pro may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.
Examining the specifications in battery power, it becomes evident that the Lenovo Tab Plus falls short in comparison to the Hotwav Cyber X Pro. The Lenovo Tab Plus is equipped with a 8600 mAh battery, whereas the Hotwav Cyber X Pro boasts a more substantial 10200 mAh capacity. This slight but significant difference in battery capacity positions the Hotwav Cyber X Pro as the preferable choice for those prioritizing extended usage. The higher milliampere-hour rating of the Hotwav Cyber X Pro translates to a potentially longer lasting power performance, highlighting the importance of even small disparities in battery capacities when evaluating the overall endurance of devices.
In a positive turn of events, both the Lenovo Tab Plus and Hotwav Cyber X Pro come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Lenovo Tab Plus emerges as the superior choice. While the Hotwav Cyber X Pro offers a respectable 33W Fast Charging, the Lenovo Tab Plus outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 45W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Lenovo Tab Plus as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Lenovo Tab Plus provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.
At the security features, it becomes evident that the Lenovo Tab Plus falls short in comparison to the Hotwav Cyber X Pro. The Lenovo Tab Plus lacks any dedicated biometric sensor, a notable distinction from the Hotwav Cyber X Pro, where a dedicated biometric sensor is present. This disparity underscores that, in terms of security, the Hotwav Cyber X Pro holds a distinct advantage over the Lenovo Tab Plus. The absence of a dedicated biometric sensor on the Lenovo Tab Plus emphasizes the Hotwav Cyber X Pro superior security features, offering users a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Lenovo Tab Plus has better overall performance than Hotwav Cyber X Pro, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Lenovo Tab Plus has a very similar overall performance to Hotwav Cyber X Pro, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Hotwav Cyber X Pro has better overall performance than Lenovo Tab Plus, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.
