Lenovo Tab Plus

Lenovo Tab Plus

Single Setup

650 gram

8600 mAh

Android 14

11.5" (Inch)

8GB RAM

AGM PAD P1

AGM PAD P1

Single Setup

470 gram

7000 mAh

Android 13

10.36" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Announced

Date

June 2024

June 2023

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

Unknown

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 13

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

Android Stock UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

-

2G / 3G / 4G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

-

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

70
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE

5.2, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

268.3 x 174.2 x 13.5 mm

250.3 x 160 x 9 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

650 g

470 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Silver

Gray

Official available body color options.

Score

75
100

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Helio G99

MediaTek Helio G99

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G57 MC2

Mali-G57 MC2

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB

8GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

128GB / 256GB

256GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDHC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

11.5"

10.36"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1200 x 2000 pixels

1200 x 2000 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~203 ppi density, 90Hz

~225 ppi density

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

8600 mAh

7000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 45W

Fast charging 18W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

8 MP, AF

8 MP, AF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

8 MP

5 MP

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 720p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

80
80

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

-

-

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

-

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer

Accelerometer, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

80
80

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $290

~ $220

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €280

~ €210

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The build quality of the AGM PAD P1 surpasses that of the Lenovo Tab Plus, owing to the difference in their construction materials. The AGM PAD P1 features an polycarbonate structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Lenovo Tab Plus. The polycarbonate constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the AGM PAD P1 polycarbonate build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Lenovo Tab Plus plastic construction.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Lenovo Tab Plus with its ~203 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the AGM PAD P1, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~225. The AGM PAD P1 gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the AGM PAD P1, its elevated ppi of ~225 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Lenovo Tab Plus.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the Lenovo Tab Plus and the AGM PAD P1, the Lenovo Tab Plus emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 90Hz refresh rate, surpassing the AGM PAD P1 with 60Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Lenovo Tab Plus with 90Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

Comparing the Lenovo Tab Plus that which lacks mobile SIM support, with the AGM PAD P1 boasting 4G capabilities, reveals a notable disparity. The absence of mobile SIM support in the Lenovo Tab Plus places it at a distinct disadvantage, especially for those reliant on seamless connectivity through mobile networks. In situations where users prioritize mobile SIM features, the AGM PAD P1 emerges as the preferred choice.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Lenovo Tab Plus nor AGM PAD P1 holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.2 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Lenovo Tab Plus and the AGM PAD P1, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Unfortunately, both the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 lack NFC features, resulting in a tie between them. The absence of NFC constrains these devices in terms of modern connectivity and functionality. NFC serves as a wireless technology that enables seamless data exchange between devices in close proximity, offering diverse applications such as contactless payments, swift file sharing, and simplified pairing with other compatible devices. Consequently, users of Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 may encounter limitations in fully exploiting the potential for hassle free connectivity.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Lenovo Tab Plus is equipped with 8GB of RAM, while the AGM PAD P1 offers a range of 8GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Lenovo Tab Plus presents a range of 128GB / 256GB of internal memory storage, while AGM PAD P1 offers a 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Differing from the Lenovo Tab Plus, the AGM PAD P1 stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Lenovo Tab Plus, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Lenovo Tab Plus boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Helio G99 processor and Mali-G57 MC2, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Helio G99 and Mali-G57 MC2 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Lenovo Tab Plus to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, AGM PAD P1 features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the MediaTek Helio G99 processor and Mali-G57 MC2. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the MediaTek Helio G99 and Mali-G57 MC2 tandem enables the AGM PAD P1 to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 is likely to be comparable.

For an optimal gaming experience, the Lenovo Tab Plus distinguishes itself with its notably larger 11.5" screen, surpassing the AGM PAD P1, which features a comparatively smaller 10.36" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Lenovo Tab Plus emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 90Hz refresh rate, surpassing the AGM PAD P1 that only comes with 60Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Lenovo Tab Plus translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 share a common ground, utilizing a Single Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 8 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.

When discussing front camera features, the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Lenovo Tab Plus outshines the AGM PAD P1, boasting a significantly higher 8 MP front camera compared to the 5 MP front camera on the AGM PAD P1. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Sadly, the both of Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Lenovo Tab Plus surpasses the AGM PAD P1. The Lenovo Tab Plus boasts a substantial 8600 mAh battery, while the AGM PAD P1 falls slightly behind with a 7000 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Lenovo Tab Plus as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Lenovo Tab Plus is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the AGM PAD P1.

In a positive turn of events, both the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Lenovo Tab Plus emerges as the superior choice. While the AGM PAD P1 offers a respectable 18W Fast Charging, the Lenovo Tab Plus outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 45W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Lenovo Tab Plus as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Lenovo Tab Plus provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Unfortunately, both the Lenovo Tab Plus and AGM PAD P1 lack dedicated biometric sensors for enhanced security. The overall tie in their performance highlights a shared limitation. The absence of a distinct advantage in terms of biometric security features suggests that, in the contemporary era where security is paramount, the lack of advancements in this aspect may be considered a drawback. In a landscape where technological innovations continually shape user experiences, the absence of distinctiveness in dedicated security sensors on both devices might be seen as a missed opportunity to provide users with a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Mobile network not available
  • No SIM Card function supported
  • Average WLAN connection speed

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Average WLAN connection speed

Benchmark

Point Result

Lenovo Tab Plus

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 80
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 70
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 80
Audio : 95

AGM PAD P1

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 80
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 80
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Lenovo Tab Plus

Lenovo Tab Plus

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Lenovo Tab Plus has better overall performance than AGM PAD P1, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Lenovo Tab Plus has a very similar overall performance to AGM PAD P1, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

AGM PAD P1

AGM PAD P1

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that AGM PAD P1 has better overall performance than Lenovo Tab Plus, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Lenovo Tab Plus

Lenovo Tab Plus

Amazon
AGM PAD P1

AGM PAD P1

Amazon