Compare Tools :
Date
June 2024
December 2023
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
Unknown
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 14
Android 13
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
Android Stock UI
Android Stock UI
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G
2G / 3G / 4G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.0, A2DP, LE
5.0, A2DP, LE
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
256.8 x 168.3 x 7.9 mm
257.5 x 162 x 7.5 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
510 g
491 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Plastic
Plastic
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Blue
Gray
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
Unisoc T606
Unisoc T616
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Mali-G57
Mali-G57
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
4GB
8GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
128GB
256GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
MicroSDXC
MicroSDXC
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
10.95"
11.0"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
IPS LCD
IPS LCD
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
1200 x 1920 pixels
1200 x 2000 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~207 ppi density
~212 ppi density
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
7000 mAh
7500 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
-
Fast charging 25W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Single Setup
Dual Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
8 MP, AF
(Main) 13 MP, f/2.2, AF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
-
(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
5 MP
8 MP, f/2.2
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 720p@30fps
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
3.5mm jack
3.5mm jack, Quad Speaker
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
-
-
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
-
-
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer
Accelerometer
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $150
~ $170
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €140
~ €160
Price in Euros (EUR).
itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.
Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab.
In terms of visual quality performance, the itel VistaTab 30 with its ~207 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the UMIDIGI A15 Tab, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~212. The UMIDIGI A15 Tab gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.
This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the UMIDIGI A15 Tab, its elevated ppi of ~212 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the itel VistaTab 30.
In the realm of display panel technology, the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab.
From the screen refresh rate features, the itel VistaTab 30 and the UMIDIGI A15 Tab align with their 60Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the itel VistaTab 30 and the UMIDIGI A15 Tab find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.
If we compare the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab, both are supported by 4G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 4G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.
Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither itel VistaTab 30 nor UMIDIGI A15 Tab holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.0 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the itel VistaTab 30 and the UMIDIGI A15 Tab, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.
Unfortunately, both the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab lack NFC features, resulting in a tie between them. The absence of NFC constrains these devices in terms of modern connectivity and functionality. NFC serves as a wireless technology that enables seamless data exchange between devices in close proximity, offering diverse applications such as contactless payments, swift file sharing, and simplified pairing with other compatible devices. Consequently, users of itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab may encounter limitations in fully exploiting the potential for hassle free connectivity.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Examining the specification data, itel VistaTab 30 offers a RAM configuration of 4GB, while the UMIDIGI A15 Tab boasts a more substantial 8GB RAM range. Clearly, the UMIDIGI A15 Tab holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Referencing the specifications, itel VistaTab 30 offers internal storage options ranging from 128GB, while UMIDIGI A15 Tab surpasses this with an impressive 256GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in UMIDIGI A15 Tab, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. UMIDIGI A15 Tab stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.
Differing from the itel VistaTab 30, the UMIDIGI A15 Tab stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the itel VistaTab 30, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, The itel VistaTab 30 adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the Unisoc T606 processor coupled with the Mali-G57. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the itel VistaTab 30 may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the itel VistaTab 30 sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.
Next, UMIDIGI A15 Tab features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Unisoc T616 processor and Mali-G57. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Unisoc T616 and Mali-G57 tandem enables the UMIDIGI A15 Tab to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.
Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is itel VistaTab 30 comes with less RAM than UMIDIGI A15 Tab. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the UMIDIGI A15 Tab holds an advantage over the itel VistaTab 30 due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the UMIDIGI A15 Tab, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.
To attain an optimal gaming experience, the itel VistaTab 30 is equipped with a 10.95" screen, slightly smaller than the UMIDIGI A15 Tab, which boasts a 11.0" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The UMIDIGI A15 Tab marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.
Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab stand on equal footing with identical 60Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 60Hz refresh rate shared by itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.
itel VistaTab 30 appears to be in for some tough competition from the UMIDIGI A15 Tab. While the itel VistaTab 30 settles for a Single Setup, the UMIDIGI A15 Tab takes things up a notch with its impressive Dual Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the UMIDIGI A15 Tab promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the itel VistaTab 30 Single Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the UMIDIGI A15 Tab in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.
Transitioning to main camera resolution, the itel VistaTab 30 introduces a 8 MP camera, while the UMIDIGI A15 Tab boasts an impressive 13 MP. In this aspect, the UMIDIGI A15 Tab holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the itel VistaTab 30. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.
This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the UMIDIGI A15 Tab, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.
When discussing front camera features, the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the UMIDIGI A15 Tab holds a distinct advantage over the itel VistaTab 30. The UMIDIGI A15 Tab boasts a larger 8 MP front camera, while the itel VistaTab 30 features a 5 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the UMIDIGI A15 Tab provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.
Sadly, the both of itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.
Examining the specifications in battery power, it becomes evident that the itel VistaTab 30 falls short in comparison to the UMIDIGI A15 Tab. The itel VistaTab 30 is equipped with a 7000 mAh battery, whereas the UMIDIGI A15 Tab boasts a more substantial 7500 mAh capacity. This slight but significant difference in battery capacity positions the UMIDIGI A15 Tab as the preferable choice for those prioritizing extended usage. The higher milliampere-hour rating of the UMIDIGI A15 Tab translates to a potentially longer lasting power performance, highlighting the importance of even small disparities in battery capacities when evaluating the overall endurance of devices.
Then, if we comparing the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab, it becomes evident that the UMIDIGI A15 Tab holds a significant advantage. The UMIDIGI A15 Tab is equipped with Fast Charging 25W features, a noteworthy capability absent in the itel VistaTab 30. This distinction gives the UMIDIGI A15 Tab a clear edge in terms of charging efficiency. With its faster charging technology, the UMIDIGI A15 Tab ensures a more rapid replenishment of the battery compared to the itel VistaTab 30. In scenarios where quick charging is a priority, the UMIDIGI A15 Tab stands out as a superior choice, offering users a more expedited charging experience without compromising on performance.
Unfortunately, both the itel VistaTab 30 and UMIDIGI A15 Tab lack dedicated biometric sensors for enhanced security. The overall tie in their performance highlights a shared limitation. The absence of a distinct advantage in terms of biometric security features suggests that, in the contemporary era where security is paramount, the lack of advancements in this aspect may be considered a drawback. In a landscape where technological innovations continually shape user experiences, the absence of distinctiveness in dedicated security sensors on both devices might be seen as a missed opportunity to provide users with a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that itel VistaTab 30 has better overall performance than UMIDIGI A15 Tab, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that itel VistaTab 30 has a very similar overall performance to UMIDIGI A15 Tab, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that UMIDIGI A15 Tab has better overall performance than itel VistaTab 30, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.
