Durability

itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1 share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1 becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the itel VistaTab 30 with its ~207 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the AGM Note N1, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~269. The AGM Note N1 gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the AGM Note N1, its elevated ppi of ~269 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the itel VistaTab 30.

In the realm of display panel technology, the itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1 share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1.

When considering the refresh rate feature, the itel VistaTab 30 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the AGM Note N1 takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 90Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1, both are supported by 4G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1 on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 4G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1 are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither itel VistaTab 30 nor AGM Note N1 holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1 both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.0 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the itel VistaTab 30 and the AGM Note N1, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Unfortunately, both the itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1 lack NFC features, resulting in a tie between them. The absence of NFC constrains these devices in terms of modern connectivity and functionality. NFC serves as a wireless technology that enables seamless data exchange between devices in close proximity, offering diverse applications such as contactless payments, swift file sharing, and simplified pairing with other compatible devices. Consequently, users of itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1 may encounter limitations in fully exploiting the potential for hassle free connectivity.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, itel VistaTab 30 offers a RAM configuration of 4GB, while the AGM Note N1 boasts a more substantial 8GB RAM range. Clearly, the AGM Note N1 holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, itel VistaTab 30 presents a range of 128GB of internal memory storage, while AGM Note N1 offers a 128GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Differing from the itel VistaTab 30, the AGM Note N1 stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the itel VistaTab 30, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The itel VistaTab 30 adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the Unisoc T606 processor coupled with the Mali-G57. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the itel VistaTab 30 may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the itel VistaTab 30 sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, AGM Note N1 features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Unisoc T606 processor and Mali-G57. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Unisoc T606 and Mali-G57 tandem enables the AGM Note N1 to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is itel VistaTab 30 comes with less RAM than AGM Note N1. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the AGM Note N1 holds an advantage over the itel VistaTab 30 due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the AGM Note N1, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

For an optimal gaming experience, the itel VistaTab 30 distinguishes itself with its notably larger 10.95" screen, surpassing the AGM Note N1, which features a comparatively smaller 6.52" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the itel VistaTab 30 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the AGM Note N1 takes it up a notch with an impressive 90Hz capability. This distinction places the AGM Note N1 in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.

Camera Features

itel VistaTab 30 appears to be in for some tough competition from the AGM Note N1. While the itel VistaTab 30 settles for a Single Setup, the AGM Note N1 takes things up a notch with its impressive Dual Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the AGM Note N1 promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the itel VistaTab 30 Single Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the AGM Note N1 in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the itel VistaTab 30 introduces a 8 MP camera, while the AGM Note N1 boasts an impressive 50 MP. In this aspect, the AGM Note N1 holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the itel VistaTab 30. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the AGM Note N1, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the AGM Note N1 holds a distinct advantage over the itel VistaTab 30. The AGM Note N1 boasts a larger 8 MP front camera, while the itel VistaTab 30 features a 5 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the AGM Note N1 provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Sadly, the both of itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1 are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1 may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the itel VistaTab 30 and the AGM Note N1 becomes a notable advantage. The itel VistaTab 30, equipped with an impressive 7000 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the AGM Note N1 5000 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the itel VistaTab 30 as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The itel VistaTab 30 robust 7000 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.

Talking on fast charging capabilities, the itel VistaTab 30 and AGM Note N1 share a similar standing, as neither device is equipped with a fast charging feature. With both smartphones relying solely on standard charging methods, the absence of rapid charging technology levels the playing field. Consequently, users can expect a comparable charging experience from both the itel VistaTab 30 and the AGM Note N1, eliminating any significant advantage in this aspect. The absence of fast charging features positions the devices on equal footing, resulting in a tie when it comes to evaluating their charging capabilities.

Security Features

At the security features, it becomes evident that the itel VistaTab 30 falls short in comparison to the AGM Note N1. The itel VistaTab 30 lacks any dedicated biometric sensor, a notable distinction from the AGM Note N1, where a dedicated biometric sensor is present. This disparity underscores that, in terms of security, the AGM Note N1 holds a distinct advantage over the itel VistaTab 30. The absence of a dedicated biometric sensor on the itel VistaTab 30 emphasizes the AGM Note N1 superior security features, offering users a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.