Durability

Doogee T30e and Blackview A85 share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85 becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Doogee T30e with its ~137 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Blackview A85, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~272. The Blackview A85 gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Blackview A85, its elevated ppi of ~272 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Doogee T30e.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85 share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Doogee T30e and the Blackview A85 align with their 60Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Doogee T30e and the Blackview A85 find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85, both are supported by 4G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85 on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 4G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85. First, the Doogee T30e features Wi-Fi 5, while Blackview A85 utilizes by Wi-Fi 4 technology. From a technical standpoint, Doogee T30e holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 5 offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 4. Consequently, the Doogee T30e ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Blackview A85.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85 both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.0 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Doogee T30e and the Blackview A85, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

From the NFC technology perspective, Doogee T30e lacks the NFC feature, while the Blackview A85 comes equipped with it, making the Blackview A85 notably superior. The NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless technology facilitating smooth data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Doogee T30e restricts its capabilities for convenient applications like quick file sharing, contactless payments, and seamless connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. Conversely, the inclusion of NFC in the Blackview A85 enhances its versatility, providing users with an extended range of applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Doogee T30e offers a RAM configuration of 4GB, while the Blackview A85 boasts a more substantial 8GB RAM range. Clearly, the Blackview A85 holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Doogee T30e presents a range of 128GB of internal memory storage, while Blackview A85 offers a 128GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Doogee T30e and Blackview A85. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Highlighting a notable distinction, the Blackview A85 introduces an interesting feature by incorporating external memory expansion, a capability notably absent in the Doogee T30e. This feature proves advantageous for users seeking enhanced storage flexibility. With external memory expansion, Blackview A85 users can easily amplify their device storage by adding a compatible external memory card. This becomes particularly beneficial for individuals who require additional space for storing diverse data, be it large files, multimedia content, or extra applications. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to tailor and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, offering a practical solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Doogee T30e adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the Unisoc T606 processor coupled with the Mali-G57. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Doogee T30e may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Doogee T30e sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, Blackview A85 features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Unisoc T606 processor and Mali-G57 MP1. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Unisoc T606 and Mali-G57 MP1 tandem enables the Blackview A85 to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Doogee T30e comes with less RAM than Blackview A85. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Blackview A85 holds an advantage over the Doogee T30e due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Blackview A85, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

For an optimal gaming experience, the Doogee T30e distinguishes itself with its notably larger 11.0" screen, surpassing the Blackview A85, which features a comparatively smaller 6.5" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85 stand on equal footing with identical 60Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 60Hz refresh rate shared by Doogee T30e and Blackview A85 ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

Doogee T30e appears to be in for some tough competition from the Blackview A85. While the Doogee T30e settles for a Single Setup, the Blackview A85 takes things up a notch with its impressive Dual Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Blackview A85 promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Doogee T30e Single Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Blackview A85 in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Doogee T30e introduces a 13 MP camera, while the Blackview A85 boasts an impressive 50 MP. In this aspect, the Blackview A85 holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Doogee T30e. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Blackview A85, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Blackview A85 holds a distinct advantage over the Doogee T30e. The Blackview A85 boasts a larger 8 MP front camera, while the Doogee T30e features a 5 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Blackview A85 provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Sadly, the both of Doogee T30e and Blackview A85 are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85 may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Doogee T30e and the Blackview A85 becomes a notable advantage. The Doogee T30e, equipped with an impressive 8000 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the Blackview A85 4480 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Doogee T30e as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Doogee T30e robust 8000 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.

In a positive development, both the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85 incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Blackview A85 emerges as the more advanced choice. The Blackview A85 boasts a Fast Charging capability of 18W, surpassing the Doogee T30e 10W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Blackview A85 as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Blackview A85 ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.

Security Features

Unfortunately, both the Doogee T30e and Blackview A85 lack dedicated biometric sensors for enhanced security. The overall tie in their performance highlights a shared limitation. The absence of a distinct advantage in terms of biometric security features suggests that, in the contemporary era where security is paramount, the lack of advancements in this aspect may be considered a drawback. In a landscape where technological innovations continually shape user experiences, the absence of distinctiveness in dedicated security sensors on both devices might be seen as a missed opportunity to provide users with a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.