Compare Tools :
Date
June 2024
July 2020
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
V2011A
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 14
Android 10
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
ColorOS 14 UI
FuntouchOS 10.5
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G / CDMA / EVDO
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Dual SIM, Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.3, A2DP, LE
5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
165.8 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm
158.5 x 73 x 8.8 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
186 g
192.2 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Plastic, IP54 Rated
Aluminum + Glass / Leather Case
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Black, Purple
Blue, Brown
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
Mediatek Dimensity 6300
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Mali-G57 MC2
Adreno 650
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
8GB
8GB / 12GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
128GB / 256GB
128GB / 256GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
MicroSDXC
-
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
6.67"
6.56"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
IPS LCD
AMOLED
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
720 x 1604 pixels
1080 x 2376 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~264 ppi density, 120Hz
~398 ppi density, 120Hz, HDR10+
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
5100 mAh
4350 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 45W
Fast charging 44W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Dual Setup
Quad Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, PDAF
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm, 1/1.31", 1.2µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4
(Tele) 13 MP, f/3.0, 135mm, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
-
(Tele) 32 MP, f/2.1, 50mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
(Ultrawide) 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm, 1/3.4", 1.0µm
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
8 MP, f/2.0
32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Video Recording 8K@30fps / 4K@60fps / 1080p@60fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
3.5mm jack
-
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
Fingerprint (at the side)
Fingerprint (under display)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Yes, Dual-Band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
-
Yes
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Color Spectrum
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $210
~ $660
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €200
~ €600
Price in Euros (EUR).
The build quality of the Vivo X50 Pro+ surpasses that of the Oppo A3 Pro (India), owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Vivo X50 Pro+ features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Oppo A3 Pro (India). The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Vivo X50 Pro+ aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Oppo A3 Pro (India) plastic construction.
While the Oppo A3 Pro (India) features with a standard cover, the Vivo X50 Pro+ distinguishes itself by elevating its design with a more luxurious glass cover, adding an extra layer of sophistication and durability. The incorporation of a glass cover sets the Vivo X50 Pro+ apart, not only in terms of aesthetics but also in the tactile and visual experience it offers. Beyond the surface level appeal, the glass cover enhances the device durability, providing robust yet stylish protection. This distinction makes the Vivo X50 Pro+ more intriguing than the Oppo A3 Pro (India), as it caters to individuals seeking a combination of elegance and resilience in their device.
In terms of visual quality performance, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) with its ~264 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Vivo X50 Pro+, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~398. The Vivo X50 Pro+ gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.
This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Vivo X50 Pro+, its elevated ppi of ~398 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Oppo A3 Pro (India).
In the realm of display hardware, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Vivo X50 Pro+ boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Vivo X50 Pro+ displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.
From the screen refresh rate features, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and the Vivo X50 Pro+ align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and the Vivo X50 Pro+ find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.
If we compare the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+ on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.
Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+ are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Oppo A3 Pro (India) nor Vivo X50 Pro+ holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.3, surpassing the Vivo X50 Pro+, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.1. This condition gives the Oppo A3 Pro (India) a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.3 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.1. Therefore, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Vivo X50 Pro+.
From the NFC technology perspective, Oppo A3 Pro (India) lacks the NFC feature, while the Vivo X50 Pro+ comes equipped with it, making the Vivo X50 Pro+ notably superior. The NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless technology facilitating smooth data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Oppo A3 Pro (India) restricts its capabilities for convenient applications like quick file sharing, contactless payments, and seamless connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. Conversely, the inclusion of NFC in the Vivo X50 Pro+ enhances its versatility, providing users with an extended range of applications.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Examining the specification data, Oppo A3 Pro (India) offers a RAM configuration of 8GB, while the Vivo X50 Pro+ boasts a more substantial 8GB / 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the Vivo X50 Pro+ holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Oppo A3 Pro (India) presents a range of 128GB / 256GB of internal memory storage, while Vivo X50 Pro+ offers a 128GB / 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.
Highlighting a notable distinction, the Vivo X50 Pro+ introduces an interesting feature by incorporating external memory expansion, a capability notably absent in the Oppo A3 Pro (India). This feature proves advantageous for users seeking enhanced storage flexibility. With external memory expansion, Vivo X50 Pro+ users can easily amplify their device storage by adding a compatible external memory card. This becomes particularly beneficial for individuals who require additional space for storing diverse data, be it large files, multimedia content, or extra applications. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to tailor and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, offering a practical solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, The Oppo A3 Pro (India) boasts a formidable combination of the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 processor and Mali-G57 MC2, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 and Mali-G57 MC2 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Oppo A3 Pro (India) to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.
Next, Vivo X50 Pro+ stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 processor and the Adreno 650. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 650 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Vivo X50 Pro+ excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Vivo X50 Pro+ emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.
Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Oppo A3 Pro (India) comes with less RAM than Vivo X50 Pro+. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Vivo X50 Pro+ holds an advantage over the Oppo A3 Pro (India) due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Vivo X50 Pro+, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.
When it comes to optimizing the gaming experience on mobile phones, screen size plays a crucial role in determining visual clarity and immersion. In the context of the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) boasts a slightly larger 6.67" screen compared to the Vivo X50 Pro+ is 6.56" display. This slight difference in size can contribute to a more immersive gaming experience for users. A larger screen provides a more expansive field of view, allowing gamers to perceive in game details with greater clarity and precision. This enhanced visibility becomes particularly important in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential. Additionally, a larger screen can make gaming sessions more enjoyable by offering a more engaging and immersive visual experience.
Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+ stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+ ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.
Oppo A3 Pro (India) appears to be in for some tough competition from the Vivo X50 Pro+. While the Oppo A3 Pro (India) settles for a Dual Setup, the Vivo X50 Pro+ takes things up a notch with its impressive Quad Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Vivo X50 Pro+ promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Vivo X50 Pro+ in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.
Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+ are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 50 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+ on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.
Delving further into the intricacies of the camera features on both smartphones, a distinctive characteristic emerges in the Vivo X50 Pro+, setting it apart from the Oppo A3 Pro (India), that is inclusion of dedicated lenses for Telephoto functionality. This noteworthy feature, absent in the Oppo A3 Pro (India), grants the Vivo X50 Pro+ the capability to employ optical zoom, ensuring sharper and more detailed results when capturing distant subjects. The absence of dedicated Telephoto lenses in the Oppo A3 Pro (India) implies a reliance on alternative methods, potentially utilizing digital zoom, which often compromises image quality. The Vivo X50 Pro+ incorporation of optical zoom through its dedicated Telephoto lenses signifies a strategic enhancement in the realm of smartphone photography, offering users the advantage of capturing distant scenes with precision and clarity.
When discussing front camera features, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+ appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Vivo X50 Pro+ holds a distinct advantage over the Oppo A3 Pro (India). The Vivo X50 Pro+ boasts a larger 32 MP front camera, while the Oppo A3 Pro (India) features a 8 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Vivo X50 Pro+ provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.
Next, In the realm of video recording, a noteworthy distinction arises between the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and the Vivo X50 Pro+. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Oppo A3 Pro (India) is a significant limitation when compared to the Vivo X50 Pro+, which incorporates OIS technology. OIS plays a crucial role in reducing unwanted motion and vibrations during video recording, resulting in smoother and more professionally captured footage. In practical terms, this means that the Vivo X50 Pro+ can deliver more stable and visually appealing videos, especially in situations where there might be hand movements or external disturbances. The inclusion of OIS in the Vivo X50 Pro+ contributes to a superior video recording experience, making it a more desirable choice for users who prioritize high quality and steady video footage over time.
Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Oppo A3 Pro (India) surpasses the Vivo X50 Pro+. The Oppo A3 Pro (India) boasts a substantial 5100 mAh battery, while the Vivo X50 Pro+ falls slightly behind with a 4350 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Oppo A3 Pro (India) as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Vivo X50 Pro+.
In a positive turn of events, both the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+ come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) emerges as the superior choice. While the Vivo X50 Pro+ offers a respectable 44W Fast Charging, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 45W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Oppo A3 Pro (India) as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Oppo A3 Pro (India) provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.
Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo X50 Pro+, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Oppo A3 Pro (India) has better overall performance than Vivo X50 Pro+, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Oppo A3 Pro (India) has a very similar overall performance to Vivo X50 Pro+, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo X50 Pro+ has better overall performance than Oppo A3 Pro (India), based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.
