Oppo A3 Pro (India)

Oppo A3 Pro (India)

Dual Setup

186 gram

5100 mAh

Android 14

6.67" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Vivo V25 Pro

Vivo V25 Pro

Triple Setup

190 gram

4830 mAh

Android 12

6.56" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Announced

Date

June 2024

August 2022

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

V2158A

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 12

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

ColorOS 14 UI

FuntouchOS 12

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.3, A2DP, LE

5.2, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

165.8 x 76.1 x 7.7 mm

158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

186 g

190 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic, IP54 Rated

Plastic + Glass Case

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, Purple

Black, Blue

Official available body color options.

Score

100
85

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Mediatek Dimensity 6300

MediaTek Dimensity 1300

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G57 MC2

Mali-G77 MC9

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB

8GB / 12GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

128GB / 256GB

128GB / 256GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.67"

6.56"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

AMOLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

720 x 1604 pixels

1080 x 2376 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~264 ppi density, 120Hz

~398 ppi density, 120Hz, HDR10+

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

5100 mAh

4830 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 45W

Fast charging 66W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Dual Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, PDAF

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm, 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Ultrawide) 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

8 MP, f/2.0

32 MP, f/2.5, 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

85
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the side)

Fingerprint (under display)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

-

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

90
90

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $210

~ $450

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €200

~ €440

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

While the Oppo A3 Pro (India) features with a standard cover, the Vivo V25 Pro distinguishes itself by elevating its design with a more luxurious glass cover, adding an extra layer of sophistication and durability. The incorporation of a glass cover sets the Vivo V25 Pro apart, not only in terms of aesthetics but also in the tactile and visual experience it offers. Beyond the surface level appeal, the glass cover enhances the device durability, providing robust yet stylish protection. This distinction makes the Vivo V25 Pro more intriguing than the Oppo A3 Pro (India), as it caters to individuals seeking a combination of elegance and resilience in their device.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) with its ~264 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Vivo V25 Pro, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~398. The Vivo V25 Pro gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Vivo V25 Pro, its elevated ppi of ~398 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Oppo A3 Pro (India).

In the realm of display hardware, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Vivo V25 Pro boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Vivo V25 Pro displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and the Vivo V25 Pro align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and the Vivo V25 Pro find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Oppo A3 Pro (India) nor Vivo V25 Pro holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.3, surpassing the Vivo V25 Pro, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.2. This condition gives the Oppo A3 Pro (India) a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.3 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.2. Therefore, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Vivo V25 Pro.

Unfortunately, both the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro lack NFC features, resulting in a tie between them. The absence of NFC constrains these devices in terms of modern connectivity and functionality. NFC serves as a wireless technology that enables seamless data exchange between devices in close proximity, offering diverse applications such as contactless payments, swift file sharing, and simplified pairing with other compatible devices. Consequently, users of Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro may encounter limitations in fully exploiting the potential for hassle free connectivity.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Oppo A3 Pro (India) offers a RAM configuration of 8GB, while the Vivo V25 Pro boasts a more substantial 8GB / 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the Vivo V25 Pro holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Oppo A3 Pro (India) presents a range of 128GB / 256GB of internal memory storage, while Vivo V25 Pro offers a 128GB / 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Differing from the Oppo A3 Pro (India), the Vivo V25 Pro stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Oppo A3 Pro (India), proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Oppo A3 Pro (India) boasts a formidable combination of the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 processor and Mali-G57 MC2, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 and Mali-G57 MC2 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Oppo A3 Pro (India) to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Vivo V25 Pro stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable MediaTek Dimensity 1300 processor and the Mali-G77 MC9. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The MediaTek Dimensity 1300 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Mali-G77 MC9 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Vivo V25 Pro excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Vivo V25 Pro emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Oppo A3 Pro (India) comes with less RAM than Vivo V25 Pro. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Vivo V25 Pro holds an advantage over the Oppo A3 Pro (India) due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Vivo V25 Pro, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

When it comes to optimizing the gaming experience on mobile phones, screen size plays a crucial role in determining visual clarity and immersion. In the context of the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) boasts a slightly larger 6.67" screen compared to the Vivo V25 Pro is 6.56" display. This slight difference in size can contribute to a more immersive gaming experience for users. A larger screen provides a more expansive field of view, allowing gamers to perceive in game details with greater clarity and precision. This enhanced visibility becomes particularly important in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential. Additionally, a larger screen can make gaming sessions more enjoyable by offering a more engaging and immersive visual experience.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

Oppo A3 Pro (India) appears to be in for some tough competition from the Vivo V25 Pro. While the Oppo A3 Pro (India) settles for a Dual Setup, the Vivo V25 Pro takes things up a notch with its impressive Triple Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Vivo V25 Pro promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Vivo V25 Pro in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) introduces a 50 MP camera, while the Vivo V25 Pro boasts an impressive 64 MP. In this aspect, the Vivo V25 Pro holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Oppo A3 Pro (India). The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Vivo V25 Pro, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Vivo V25 Pro holds a distinct advantage over the Oppo A3 Pro (India). The Vivo V25 Pro boasts a larger 32 MP front camera, while the Oppo A3 Pro (India) features a 8 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Vivo V25 Pro provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Next, In the realm of video recording, a noteworthy distinction arises between the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and the Vivo V25 Pro. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Oppo A3 Pro (India) is a significant limitation when compared to the Vivo V25 Pro, which incorporates OIS technology. OIS plays a crucial role in reducing unwanted motion and vibrations during video recording, resulting in smoother and more professionally captured footage. In practical terms, this means that the Vivo V25 Pro can deliver more stable and visually appealing videos, especially in situations where there might be hand movements or external disturbances. The inclusion of OIS in the Vivo V25 Pro contributes to a superior video recording experience, making it a more desirable choice for users who prioritize high quality and steady video footage over time.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Oppo A3 Pro (India) surpasses the Vivo V25 Pro. The Oppo A3 Pro (India) boasts a substantial 5100 mAh battery, while the Vivo V25 Pro falls slightly behind with a 4830 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Oppo A3 Pro (India) as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Oppo A3 Pro (India) is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Vivo V25 Pro.

In a positive development, both the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Vivo V25 Pro emerges as the more advanced choice. The Vivo V25 Pro boasts a Fast Charging capability of 66W, surpassing the Oppo A3 Pro (India) 45W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Vivo V25 Pro as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Vivo V25 Pro ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Oppo A3 Pro (India) and Vivo V25 Pro, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Average WLAN connection speed

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Average WLAN connection speed

Benchmark

Point Result

Oppo A3 Pro (India)

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 90
Audio : 95

Vivo V25 Pro

Build Quality : 85
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 90
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Oppo A3 Pro (India)

Oppo A3 Pro (India)

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Oppo A3 Pro (India) has better overall performance than Vivo V25 Pro, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Oppo A3 Pro (India) has a very similar overall performance to Vivo V25 Pro, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Vivo V25 Pro

Vivo V25 Pro

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo V25 Pro has better overall performance than Oppo A3 Pro (India), based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Oppo A3 Pro (India)

Oppo A3 Pro (India)

Amazon
Vivo V25 Pro

Vivo V25 Pro

Amazon