Durability

The build quality of the Vivo X90 Pro surpasses that of the Oppo Reno11 A, owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Vivo X90 Pro features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Oppo Reno11 A. The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Vivo X90 Pro aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Oppo Reno11 A plastic construction.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Oppo Reno11 A with its ~394 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Vivo X90 Pro, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~453. The Vivo X90 Pro gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Vivo X90 Pro, its elevated ppi of ~453 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Oppo Reno11 A.

In a general perspective, the Oppo Reno11 A equipped with an OLED display panel, and the Vivo X90 Pro also featuring an AMOLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Oppo Reno11 A and the Vivo X90 Pro align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Oppo Reno11 A and the Vivo X90 Pro find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 6 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Oppo Reno11 A nor Vivo X90 Pro holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Oppo Reno11 A equipped with Bluetooth 5.2, while the Vivo X90 Pro comes with more latest Bluetooth 5.3 technology. In this scenario, Vivo X90 Pro holds a technological advantage by adopting the more recent Bluetooth technology. Bluetooth 5.3 brings improvements in terms of enhanced services, better connection performance, and increased accuracy in device positioning. Therefore, the integration of Bluetooth 5.3 in the Vivo X90 Pro positions it as the superior choice in Bluetooth technology, offering users a more advanced experience when compared with the Oppo Reno11 A.

Now, Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Oppo Reno11 A offers a RAM configuration of 8GB, while the Vivo X90 Pro boasts a more substantial 8GB / 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the Vivo X90 Pro holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referencing the specifications, Oppo Reno11 A offers internal storage options ranging from 128GB, while Vivo X90 Pro surpasses this with an impressive 256GB / 512GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Vivo X90 Pro, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Vivo X90 Pro stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Oppo Reno11 A boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Dimensity 7050 processor and Mali-G68 MC4, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 7050 and Mali-G68 MC4 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Oppo Reno11 A to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Vivo X90 Pro stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable MediaTek Dimensity 9200 processor and the Immortalis-G715. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The MediaTek Dimensity 9200 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Immortalis-G715 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Vivo X90 Pro excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Vivo X90 Pro emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Oppo Reno11 A comes with less RAM than Vivo X90 Pro. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Vivo X90 Pro holds an advantage over the Oppo Reno11 A due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Vivo X90 Pro, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Oppo Reno11 A is equipped with a 6.7" screen, slightly smaller than the Vivo X90 Pro, which boasts a 6.78" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The Vivo X90 Pro marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro share a common ground, utilizing a Triple Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Oppo Reno11 A emerges as a standout against the Vivo X90 Pro, showcasing an impressive 64 MP camera, while the Vivo X90 Pro only comes with 50 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Oppo Reno11 A, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

Delving further into the intricacies of the camera features on both smartphones, a distinctive characteristic emerges in the Vivo X90 Pro, setting it apart from the Oppo Reno11 A, that is inclusion of dedicated lenses for Telephoto functionality. This noteworthy feature, absent in the Oppo Reno11 A, grants the Vivo X90 Pro the capability to employ optical zoom, ensuring sharper and more detailed results when capturing distant subjects. The absence of dedicated Telephoto lenses in the Oppo Reno11 A implies a reliance on alternative methods, potentially utilizing digital zoom, which often compromises image quality. The Vivo X90 Pro incorporation of optical zoom through its dedicated Telephoto lenses signifies a strategic enhancement in the realm of smartphone photography, offering users the advantage of capturing distant scenes with precision and clarity.

When discussing front camera features, the Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

When look on to front camera features of the Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 32 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro stand on equal footing with an 32 MP configuration.

Next, In the realm of video recording, a noteworthy distinction arises between the Oppo Reno11 A and the Vivo X90 Pro. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Oppo Reno11 A is a significant limitation when compared to the Vivo X90 Pro, which incorporates OIS technology. OIS plays a crucial role in reducing unwanted motion and vibrations during video recording, resulting in smoother and more professionally captured footage. In practical terms, this means that the Vivo X90 Pro can deliver more stable and visually appealing videos, especially in situations where there might be hand movements or external disturbances. The inclusion of OIS in the Vivo X90 Pro contributes to a superior video recording experience, making it a more desirable choice for users who prioritize high quality and steady video footage over time.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Oppo Reno11 A surpasses the Vivo X90 Pro. The Oppo Reno11 A boasts a substantial 5000 mAh battery, while the Vivo X90 Pro falls slightly behind with a 4870 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Oppo Reno11 A as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Oppo Reno11 A is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Vivo X90 Pro.

In a positive development, both the Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Vivo X90 Pro emerges as the more advanced choice. The Vivo X90 Pro boasts a Fast Charging capability of 120W, surpassing the Oppo Reno11 A 19W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Vivo X90 Pro as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Vivo X90 Pro ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Oppo Reno11 A and Vivo X90 Pro, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.