Compare Tools :
Date
June 2024
September 2023
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
XQ-DE54
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 14
Android 13
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
ColorOS 14 UI
Android Stock UI
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Dual SIM, Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, Tri Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.2, A2DP, LE
5.3, A2DP, LE
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
162 x 75 x 7.6 mm
154 x 68 x 8.6 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
177 g
183 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Plastic
Aluminum + Glass Case, IP68 Rated
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Green, Pink
Black, White, Blue
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Mali-G68 MC4
Adreno 740
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
8GB
8GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
128GB
128GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
MicroSDXC
MicroSDXC
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
6.7"
6.1"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
OLED
OLED
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
1080 x 2412 pixels
1080 x 2520 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~394 ppi density, 120Hz
~449 ppi density, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
5000 mAh
5000 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 19.5W
Fast charging 30W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Triple Setup
Dual Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 64 MP, f/1.7, PDAF
(Main) 48 MP, f/1.9, 1/1.35", 1.12µm, OIS, PDAF, OIS
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2
(Ultrawide) 12 MP, f/2.2, 1/2.5", PDAF
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4
-
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
32 MP, f/2.4
12 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.9", 1.25µm
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Video Recording 4K@120fps / 1080p@120fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
-
3.5mm jack, Stereo Speaker
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
Fingerprint (under display)
Fingerprint (at the side)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
Yes
Yes
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer, Color Spectrum
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $310
~ $1050
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €300
~ €1000
Price in Euros (EUR).
The build quality of the Sony Xperia 5 V surpasses that of the Oppo Reno11 A, owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Sony Xperia 5 V features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Oppo Reno11 A. The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Sony Xperia 5 V aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Oppo Reno11 A plastic construction.
While the Oppo Reno11 A features with a standard cover, the Sony Xperia 5 V distinguishes itself by elevating its design with a more luxurious glass cover, adding an extra layer of sophistication and durability. The incorporation of a glass cover sets the Sony Xperia 5 V apart, not only in terms of aesthetics but also in the tactile and visual experience it offers. Beyond the surface level appeal, the glass cover enhances the device durability, providing robust yet stylish protection. This distinction makes the Sony Xperia 5 V more intriguing than the Oppo Reno11 A, as it caters to individuals seeking a combination of elegance and resilience in their device.
In terms of screen protection performance, the Oppo Reno11 A appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Sony Xperia 5 V distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Sony Xperia 5 V not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.
In terms of visual quality performance, the Oppo Reno11 A with its ~394 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Sony Xperia 5 V, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~449. The Sony Xperia 5 V gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.
This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Sony Xperia 5 V, its elevated ppi of ~449 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Oppo Reno11 A.
In a general perspective, the Oppo Reno11 A equipped with an OLED display panel, and the Sony Xperia 5 V also featuring an OLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.
From the screen refresh rate features, the Oppo Reno11 A and the Sony Xperia 5 V align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Oppo Reno11 A and the Sony Xperia 5 V find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.
If we compare the Oppo Reno11 A and Sony Xperia 5 V, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Oppo Reno11 A and Sony Xperia 5 V on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.
Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Oppo Reno11 A that equipped with Wi-Fi 6, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Sony Xperia 5 V which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 6e technology. This distinction positions the Sony Xperia 5 V at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 6e provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 6. So, the Sony Xperia 5 V with Wi-Fi 6e features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Oppo Reno11 A, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Oppo Reno11 A equipped with Bluetooth 5.2, while the Sony Xperia 5 V comes with more latest Bluetooth 5.3 technology. In this scenario, Sony Xperia 5 V holds a technological advantage by adopting the more recent Bluetooth technology. Bluetooth 5.3 brings improvements in terms of enhanced services, better connection performance, and increased accuracy in device positioning. Therefore, the integration of Bluetooth 5.3 in the Sony Xperia 5 V positions it as the superior choice in Bluetooth technology, offering users a more advanced experience when compared with the Oppo Reno11 A.
Now, Oppo Reno11 A and Sony Xperia 5 V stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Considering the specification data, the Oppo Reno11 A is equipped with 8GB of RAM, while the Sony Xperia 5 V offers a range of 8GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Oppo Reno11 A presents a range of 128GB of internal memory storage, while Sony Xperia 5 V offers a 128GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Oppo Reno11 A and Sony Xperia 5 V. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, The Oppo Reno11 A boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Dimensity 7050 processor and Mali-G68 MC4, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 7050 and Mali-G68 MC4 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Oppo Reno11 A to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.
Next, Sony Xperia 5 V features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor and Adreno 740. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and Adreno 740 tandem enables the Sony Xperia 5 V to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.
Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Oppo Reno11 A and Sony Xperia 5 V may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Oppo Reno11 A and Sony Xperia 5 V is likely to be comparable.
For an optimal gaming experience, the Oppo Reno11 A distinguishes itself with its notably larger 6.7" screen, surpassing the Sony Xperia 5 V, which features a comparatively smaller 6.1" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.
Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Oppo Reno11 A and Sony Xperia 5 V stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Oppo Reno11 A and Sony Xperia 5 V ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Oppo Reno11 A and Sony Xperia 5 V, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.
The main camera setup of the Oppo Reno11 A surpasses that Sony Xperia 5 V, offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The Oppo Reno11 A boasts Triple Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the Sony Xperia 5 V falls behind with its Dual Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the Oppo Reno11 A enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.
Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Oppo Reno11 A emerges as a standout against the Sony Xperia 5 V, showcasing an impressive 64 MP camera, while the Sony Xperia 5 V only comes with 48 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.
Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Oppo Reno11 A, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.
When discussing front camera features, the Oppo Reno11 A and Sony Xperia 5 V appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Oppo Reno11 A and Sony Xperia 5 V. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Oppo Reno11 A outshines the Sony Xperia 5 V, boasting a significantly higher 32 MP front camera compared to the 12 MP front camera on the Sony Xperia 5 V. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.
Next, In the realm of video recording, a noteworthy distinction arises between the Oppo Reno11 A and the Sony Xperia 5 V. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Oppo Reno11 A is a significant limitation when compared to the Sony Xperia 5 V, which incorporates OIS technology. OIS plays a crucial role in reducing unwanted motion and vibrations during video recording, resulting in smoother and more professionally captured footage. In practical terms, this means that the Sony Xperia 5 V can deliver more stable and visually appealing videos, especially in situations where there might be hand movements or external disturbances. The inclusion of OIS in the Sony Xperia 5 V contributes to a superior video recording experience, making it a more desirable choice for users who prioritize high quality and steady video footage over time.
After evaluating the battery power of the Oppo Reno11 A and the Sony Xperia 5 V, it becomes evident that both devices operate on an equal footing, each equipped with a 5000 mAh battery. This parity in battery capacity implies that, in terms of power endurance, the Oppo Reno11 A and the Sony Xperia 5 V yield comparable results. Users can expect similar levels of battery life from both devices, making it a draw in this aspect of comparison. The matching 5000 mAh batteries ensure that users can rely on consistent and reasonably lasting performance from either the Oppo Reno11 A or the Sony Xperia 5 V without a significant advantage for either device in the realm of battery power.
In a positive development, both the Oppo Reno11 A and Sony Xperia 5 V incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Sony Xperia 5 V emerges as the more advanced choice. The Sony Xperia 5 V boasts a Fast Charging capability of 30W, surpassing the Oppo Reno11 A 19W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Sony Xperia 5 V as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Sony Xperia 5 V ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.
Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Oppo Reno11 A and Sony Xperia 5 V, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Oppo Reno11 A has better overall performance than Sony Xperia 5 V, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Oppo Reno11 A has a very similar overall performance to Sony Xperia 5 V, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Sony Xperia 5 V has better overall performance than Oppo Reno11 A, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.