Compare Tools :
Date
June 2024
July 2022
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
Unknown
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 14
Android 12
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
ColorOS 14 UI
ColorOS 12.1 UI
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Dual SIM, Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.2, A2DP, LE
5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
162 x 75 x 7.6 mm
160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
177 g
179 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Plastic
Aluminum
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Green, Pink
Black, Gold
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
MediaTek Dimensity 1300
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Mali-G68 MC4
Mali-G77 MC9
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
8GB
8GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
128GB
128GB / 256GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
MicroSDXC
-
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
6.7"
6.4"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
OLED
AMOLED
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
1080 x 2412 pixels
1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~394 ppi density, 120Hz
20:9 ratio, (~411 ppi density), 90Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
5000 mAh
4500 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 19.5W
Fast charging 80W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Triple Setup
Triple Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 64 MP, f/1.7, PDAF
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm, 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2
(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚, 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4
(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
32 MP, f/2.4
32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm, 1/2.74", 0.8µm
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@120fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
-
-
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
Fingerprint (under display)
Fingerprint (under display)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
Yes
Yes
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $310
~ $460
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €300
~ €450
Price in Euros (EUR).
The build quality of the Oppo Reno8 surpasses that of the Oppo Reno11 A, owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Oppo Reno8 features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Oppo Reno11 A. The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Oppo Reno8 aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Oppo Reno11 A plastic construction.
Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8.
In terms of screen protection performance, the Oppo Reno11 A appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Oppo Reno8 distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Oppo Reno8 not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.
In terms of visual quality performance, the Oppo Reno11 A with its ~394 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Oppo Reno8, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~411. The Oppo Reno8 gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.
This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Oppo Reno8, its elevated ppi of ~411 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Oppo Reno11 A.
In a general perspective, the Oppo Reno11 A equipped with an OLED display panel, and the Oppo Reno8 also featuring an AMOLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.
When comparing the refresh rate time of the Oppo Reno11 A and the Oppo Reno8, the Oppo Reno11 A emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Oppo Reno8 with 90Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Oppo Reno11 A with 120Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.
If we compare the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8 on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.
Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8 are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 6 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Oppo Reno11 A nor Oppo Reno8 holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Oppo Reno11 A equipped with Bluetooth 5.2, while the Oppo Reno8 comes with more latest Bluetooth 5.3 technology. In this scenario, Oppo Reno8 holds a technological advantage by adopting the more recent Bluetooth technology. Bluetooth 5.3 brings improvements in terms of enhanced services, better connection performance, and increased accuracy in device positioning. Therefore, the integration of Bluetooth 5.3 in the Oppo Reno8 positions it as the superior choice in Bluetooth technology, offering users a more advanced experience when compared with the Oppo Reno11 A.
Now, Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8 stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Considering the specification data, the Oppo Reno11 A is equipped with 8GB of RAM, while the Oppo Reno8 offers a range of 8GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Referencing the specifications, Oppo Reno11 A offers internal storage options ranging from 128GB, while Oppo Reno8 surpasses this with an impressive 128GB / 256GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Oppo Reno8, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Oppo Reno8 stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, The Oppo Reno11 A boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Dimensity 7050 processor and Mali-G68 MC4, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 7050 and Mali-G68 MC4 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Oppo Reno11 A to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.
Next, Oppo Reno8 features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the MediaTek Dimensity 1300 processor and Mali-G77 MC9. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 1300 and Mali-G77 MC9 tandem enables the Oppo Reno8 to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.
Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8 may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8 is likely to be comparable.
For an optimal gaming experience, the Oppo Reno11 A distinguishes itself with its notably larger 6.7" screen, surpassing the Oppo Reno8, which features a comparatively smaller 6.4" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.
Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Oppo Reno11 A emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Oppo Reno8 that only comes with 90Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Oppo Reno11 A translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.
When it comes to the main camera features, both the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8 share a common ground, utilizing a Triple Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8 provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.
Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Oppo Reno11 A emerges as a standout against the Oppo Reno8, showcasing an impressive 64 MP camera, while the Oppo Reno8 only comes with 50 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.
Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Oppo Reno11 A, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.
When discussing front camera features, the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
When look on to front camera features of the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 32 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8 stand on equal footing with an 32 MP configuration.
Sadly, the both of Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8 are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8 may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.
Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Oppo Reno11 A surpasses the Oppo Reno8. The Oppo Reno11 A boasts a substantial 5000 mAh battery, while the Oppo Reno8 falls slightly behind with a 4500 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Oppo Reno11 A as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Oppo Reno11 A is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Oppo Reno8.
In a positive development, both the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8 incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Oppo Reno8 emerges as the more advanced choice. The Oppo Reno8 boasts a Fast Charging capability of 80W, surpassing the Oppo Reno11 A 19W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Oppo Reno8 as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Oppo Reno8 ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.
Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Oppo Reno11 A and Oppo Reno8, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Oppo Reno11 A has better overall performance than Oppo Reno8, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Oppo Reno11 A has a very similar overall performance to Oppo Reno8, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Oppo Reno8 has better overall performance than Oppo Reno11 A, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.