Oukitel WP39

Oukitel WP39

Triple Setup

360 gram

11000 mAh

Android 14

6.6" (Inch)

6GB RAM

Vivo T3x

Vivo T3x

Dual Setup

199 gram

6000 mAh

Android 14

6.72" (Inch)

4GB / 6GB / 8GB RAM

Announced

Date

June 2024

April 2024

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

Unknown

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 14

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

FuntouchOS 14

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE

5.1, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

172.2 x 81 x 15 mm

165.7 x 76 x 8 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

360 g

199 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H

Plastic, IP64 Rated

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, Green

Brown, Green

Official available body color options.

Score

100
100

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Dimensity 6100+

Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G57 MC2

Adreno 710

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
95

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

6GB

4GB / 6GB / 8GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB

128GB / 256GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.6"

6.72"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2408 pixels

1080 x 2408 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~400 ppi density

~393 ppi density, 120Hz

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

11000 mAh

6000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 18W

Fast charging 44W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Dual Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.9, 80°, 0.80μm, PDAF

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Night Vision) 8 MP, f/2.0

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

32 MP, f/2.2

8 MP

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
85

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

3.5mm jack, Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the side)

Fingerprint (at the side)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
90

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $190

~ $160

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €180

~ €150

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The Oukitel WP39 stands as a rugged phone, purpose built to excel in challenging environments, while the Vivo T3x represents a standard smartphone design. When it comes to navigating extreme conditions, the Oukitel WP39 takes the lead, offering superior build quality tailored for durability. Unlike the standard design of the Vivo T3x, the Oukitel WP39 features a reinforced casing constructed from robust materials, ensuring resistance to impacts, drops, and shocks. This enhanced structural integrity equips the Oukitel WP39 to endure the rigors of harsh environments with greater resilience than the Vivo T3x.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Oukitel WP39 and Vivo T3x.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Oukitel WP39 outshines the Vivo T3x, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~400, the Oukitel WP39 surpasses the Vivo T3x, which boasts ~393 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Oukitel WP39 elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Vivo T3x.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Oukitel WP39 and Vivo T3x share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Oukitel WP39 and Vivo T3x.

When considering the refresh rate feature, the Oukitel WP39 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo T3x takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 120Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Oukitel WP39 and Vivo T3x, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Oukitel WP39 and Vivo T3x on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Oukitel WP39 and Vivo T3x are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Oukitel WP39 nor Vivo T3x holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Oukitel WP39 is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.2, surpassing the Vivo T3x, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.1. This condition gives the Oukitel WP39 a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.2 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.1. Therefore, the Oukitel WP39 is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Vivo T3x.

Leveraging NFC technology, the Oukitel WP39 emerges as the superior choice over the Vivo T3x due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the Vivo T3x. The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Vivo T3x hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Oukitel WP39 enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Oukitel WP39 offers a RAM configuration of 6GB, while the Vivo T3x boasts a more substantial 4GB / 6GB / 8GB RAM range. Clearly, the Vivo T3x holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Oukitel WP39 presents a range of 256GB of internal memory storage, while Vivo T3x offers a 128GB / 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Oukitel WP39 and Vivo T3x. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Differing from the Oukitel WP39, the Vivo T3x stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Oukitel WP39, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Oukitel WP39 boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ processor and Mali-G57 MC2, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ and Mali-G57 MC2 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Oukitel WP39 to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Vivo T3x features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 processor and Adreno 710. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 and Adreno 710 tandem enables the Vivo T3x to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Oukitel WP39 comes with less RAM than Vivo T3x. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Vivo T3x holds an advantage over the Oukitel WP39 due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Vivo T3x, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Oukitel WP39 is equipped with a 6.6" screen, slightly smaller than the Vivo T3x, which boasts a 6.72" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The Vivo T3x marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.

Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the Oukitel WP39 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo T3x takes it up a notch with an impressive 120Hz capability. This distinction places the Vivo T3x in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.

Camera Features

The main camera setup of the Oukitel WP39 surpasses that Vivo T3x, offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The Oukitel WP39 boasts Triple Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the Vivo T3x falls behind with its Dual Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the Oukitel WP39 enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Oukitel WP39 emerges as a standout against the Vivo T3x, showcasing an impressive 64 MP camera, while the Vivo T3x only comes with 50 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Oukitel WP39, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

Oukitel WP39 stands out in the realm of smartphone cameras with its unique feature on main camera sector, that is already supported by Night Vision camera support, a capability notably absent in the Vivo T3x. Night Vision cameras are specialized sensors equipped with advanced infrared technology, enabling them to capture clear and detailed images even in low light or complete darkness. This innovative feature provides users with enhanced visibility during nighttime or low light scenarios, making the Oukitel WP39 particularly advantageous for capturing moments in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of Night Vision on the Vivo T3x may limit its performance in such environments, giving the Oukitel WP39 a notable edge for users who prioritize superior camera capabilities, especially in low light situations.

When discussing front camera features, the Oukitel WP39 and Vivo T3x appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Oukitel WP39 and Vivo T3x. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Oukitel WP39 outshines the Vivo T3x, boasting a significantly higher 32 MP front camera compared to the 8 MP front camera on the Vivo T3x. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Sadly, the both of Oukitel WP39 and Vivo T3x are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Oukitel WP39 and Vivo T3x may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Oukitel WP39 and the Vivo T3x becomes a notable advantage. The Oukitel WP39, equipped with an impressive 11000 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the Vivo T3x 6000 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Oukitel WP39 as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Oukitel WP39 robust 11000 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.

In a positive development, both the Oukitel WP39 and Vivo T3x incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Vivo T3x emerges as the more advanced choice. The Vivo T3x boasts a Fast Charging capability of 44W, surpassing the Oukitel WP39 18W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Vivo T3x as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Vivo T3x ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Oukitel WP39 and Vivo T3x, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Oukitel WP39

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Vivo T3x

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 95
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 90
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Oukitel WP39

Oukitel WP39

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Oukitel WP39 has better overall performance than Vivo T3x, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Oukitel WP39 has a very similar overall performance to Vivo T3x, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Vivo T3x

Vivo T3x

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo T3x has better overall performance than Oukitel WP39, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Oukitel WP39

Oukitel WP39

Amazon
Vivo T3x

Vivo T3x

Amazon