Compare Tools :
Date
June 2024
December 2022
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
Unknown
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 14
Android 12
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
Android Stock UI
Android Stock UI
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Dual SIM, Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.2, A2DP, LE
5.2, A2DP, LE
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
172.2 x 81 x 15 mm
177.7 x 80.4 x 17.7 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
360 g
375 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H
Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Black, Green
Black, Orange
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+
MediaTek Dimensity 900
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Mali-G57 MC2
Mali-G68 MC4
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
6GB
8GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
256GB
256GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
MicroSDXC
MicroSDXC
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
6.6"
6.6"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
IPS LCD
IPS LCD
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
1080 x 2408 pixels
1080 x 2408 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~400 ppi density
20:9 ratio, (~400 ppi density), 120Hz, HDR10+, Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
11000 mAh
10800 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 18W
Fast charging
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Triple Setup
Triple Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 64 MP, f/1.9, 80°, 0.80μm, PDAF
(Main) 108 MP, f/1.8, 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Night Vision) 8 MP, f/2.0
(Night Vision) 20 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.8", 1.00 µm
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4
(Ultrawide) 16 MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm, 1/2.76"
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
32 MP, f/2.2
32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
3.5mm jack
-
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
Fingerprint (at the side)
Fingerprint (at the side)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
Yes
Yes
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $190
~ $410
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €180
~ €400
Price in Euros (EUR).
Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 are two distinct rugged phones that share the common trait of being designed to withstand extreme conditions. Rugged phones are built to endure harsh environments, making them ideal for individuals who work in demanding professions or engage in outdoor activities. These phones typically feature reinforced casings, durable materials, and are resistant to water, dust, and shocks.
Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30.
In terms of screen protection performance, the Oukitel WP39 appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Doogee V30 distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Doogee V30 not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.
In terms of visual quality performance, the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 deliver similar results, both featuring a typical pixel density of ~400 pixels per inch (ppi). The identical ppi values in both devices imply that they share the same level of pixel concentration within a one inch square on their displays. Consequently, their visual quality remains consistent, resulting in a tie between the two in terms of display clarity and sharpness. The matching ppi values suggest that users can expect a comparable visual experience from both the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30, highlighting their similarity in this particular aspect of performance.
In the realm of display panel technology, the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30.
When considering the refresh rate feature, the Oukitel WP39 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Doogee V30 takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 120Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.
If we compare the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.
Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Oukitel WP39 that equipped with Wi-Fi 5, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Doogee V30 which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 6 technology. This distinction positions the Doogee V30 at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 6 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 5. So, the Doogee V30 with Wi-Fi 6 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Oukitel WP39, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.2 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Oukitel WP39 and the Doogee V30, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.
Now, Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Examining the specification data, Oukitel WP39 offers a RAM configuration of 6GB, while the Doogee V30 boasts a more substantial 8GB RAM range. Clearly, the Doogee V30 holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Oukitel WP39 presents a range of 256GB of internal memory storage, while Doogee V30 offers a 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, The Oukitel WP39 boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ processor and Mali-G57 MC2, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ and Mali-G57 MC2 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Oukitel WP39 to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.
Next, Doogee V30 features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the MediaTek Dimensity 900 processor and Mali-G68 MC4. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 and Mali-G68 MC4 tandem enables the Doogee V30 to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.
Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Oukitel WP39 comes with less RAM than Doogee V30. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Doogee V30 holds an advantage over the Oukitel WP39 due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Doogee V30, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.
In the context of gaming experience, a comparison of screen sizes between the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 reveals a notable parity, as both devices boast an identical 6.6" screen size. In this scenario of uniform screen dimensions, it logically follows that the gaming experience on both devices would be equivalent. The equality in screen dimensions implies a consistent visual experience, enabling gamers on both the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 to enjoy games with a uniform field of view and level of immersion. When screen sizes align, as in this case, the potential for a comparable gaming experience is elevated, underscoring the significance of screen dimensions in shaping the overall enjoyment of gaming on mobile devices.
Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the Oukitel WP39 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Doogee V30 takes it up a notch with an impressive 120Hz capability. This distinction places the Doogee V30 in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.
When it comes to the main camera features, both the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 share a common ground, utilizing a Triple Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.
Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Oukitel WP39 introduces a 64 MP camera, while the Doogee V30 boasts an impressive 108 MP. In this aspect, the Doogee V30 holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Oukitel WP39. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.
This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Doogee V30, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.
Upon closer examination of the camera features of both the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30, a notable similarity on both of devices are equipped with Night Vision cameras, resulting in a tie between the two in this aspect. A Night Vision camera is a specialized imaging sensor designed to capture clear and detailed images in low light or complete darkness. This technology relies on infrared illumination to enhance visibility beyond the capabilities of standard cameras. In the context of smartphones like the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30, the Night Vision feature becomes a valuable asset for users who seek improved imaging performance in challenging lighting conditions, ensuring that both devices are well-equipped to handle low light scenarios effectively.
When discussing front camera features, the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
When look on to front camera features of the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 32 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 stand on equal footing with an 32 MP configuration.
Sadly, the both of Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.
Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Oukitel WP39 surpasses the Doogee V30. The Oukitel WP39 boasts a substantial 11000 mAh battery, while the Doogee V30 falls slightly behind with a 10800 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Oukitel WP39 as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Oukitel WP39 is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Doogee V30.
In a positive turn of events, both the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30 come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Oukitel WP39 emerges as the superior choice. While the Doogee V30 offers a respectable 0W Fast Charging, the Oukitel WP39 outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 18W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Oukitel WP39 as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Oukitel WP39 provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.
Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Oukitel WP39 and Doogee V30, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Oukitel WP39 has better overall performance than Doogee V30, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Oukitel WP39 has a very similar overall performance to Doogee V30, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Doogee V30 has better overall performance than Oukitel WP39, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.