Compare Tools :
Date
June 2024
September 2021
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
V2134A / V2105
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 14
Android 11
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
Realme UI 5.0
FuntouchOS 12
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G / CDMA / EVDO
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Dual SIM, Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.4, A2DP, LE
5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
162 x 75.1 x 8.6 mm
158.3 x 73.2 x 8 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
199 g
186 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Plastic, IP65 Rated
Aluminum + Glass Case
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Silver, Green
Black, White
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Adreno 735
Mali-G77 MC9
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
8GB / 12GB / 16GB
8GB / 12GB / 16GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
256GB / 521GB
128GB / 256GB / 512GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
-
-
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
6.78"
6.56"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
LTPO AMOLED
AMOLED
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
1264 x 2780 pixels
1080 x 2376 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~450 ppi density, 120Hz
~398 ppi density, 120Hz, HDR10+, Schott Xensation Up
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
5500 mAh
4450 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 120W
Fast charging 44W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Triple Setup
Quad Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.7, OIS, PDAF
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, Laser AF, gimbal OIS
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Tele) 50 MP, f/2.0, PDAF
(Tele) 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm, 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚, 1/4.0", 1.12µm
(Tele) 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm, 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
(Ultrawide) 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 116˚, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
32 MP, f/2.5
32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 4K@60fps / 1080p@240fps
Video Recording 4K@60fps / 1080p@60fps, Zeiss Lens Optics
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
Stereo Speaker
-
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
Fingerprint (under display)
Fingerprint (under display)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
Yes, Dual-Band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
Yes
Yes
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Infrared Blaster, Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Color Spectrum
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $710
~ $870
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €700
~ €800
Price in Euros (EUR).
The build quality of the Vivo X70 Pro surpasses that of the Realme GT6, owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Vivo X70 Pro features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Realme GT6. The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Vivo X70 Pro aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Realme GT6 plastic construction.
While the Realme GT6 features with a standard cover, the Vivo X70 Pro distinguishes itself by elevating its design with a more luxurious glass cover, adding an extra layer of sophistication and durability. The incorporation of a glass cover sets the Vivo X70 Pro apart, not only in terms of aesthetics but also in the tactile and visual experience it offers. Beyond the surface level appeal, the glass cover enhances the device durability, providing robust yet stylish protection. This distinction makes the Vivo X70 Pro more intriguing than the Realme GT6, as it caters to individuals seeking a combination of elegance and resilience in their device.
In the domain of visual quality, the Realme GT6 outshines the Vivo X70 Pro, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~450, the Realme GT6 surpasses the Vivo X70 Pro, which boasts ~398 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.
A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Realme GT6 elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Vivo X70 Pro.
In a general perspective, the Realme GT6 equipped with an LTPO AMOLED display panel, and the Vivo X70 Pro also featuring an AMOLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.
From the screen refresh rate features, the Realme GT6 and the Vivo X70 Pro align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Realme GT6 and the Vivo X70 Pro find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.
If we compare the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.
Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 6 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Realme GT6 nor Vivo X70 Pro holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Realme GT6 is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.4, surpassing the Vivo X70 Pro, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.2. This condition gives the Realme GT6 a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.4 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.2. Therefore, the Realme GT6 is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Vivo X70 Pro.
Now, Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Considering the specification data, the Realme GT6 is equipped with 8GB / 12GB / 16GB of RAM, while the Vivo X70 Pro offers a range of 8GB / 12GB / 16GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Referring to the specification data, Realme GT6 emerges as the superior choice over Vivo X70 Pro, evident in its internal memory configuration of 256GB / 521GB, surpassing the 128GB / 256GB / 512GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Realme GT6 higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, Realme GT6 stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 paired with the Adreno 735. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 735 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Realme GT6, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.
Next, Vivo X70 Pro stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable MediaTek Dimensity 1200 processor and the Mali-G77 MC9. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The MediaTek Dimensity 1200 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Mali-G77 MC9 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Vivo X70 Pro excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Vivo X70 Pro emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.
Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro is likely to be comparable.
For an optimal gaming experience, the Realme GT6 distinguishes itself with its notably larger 6.78" screen, surpassing the Vivo X70 Pro, which features a comparatively smaller 6.56" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.
Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.
Realme GT6 appears to be in for some tough competition from the Vivo X70 Pro. While the Realme GT6 settles for a Triple Setup, the Vivo X70 Pro takes things up a notch with its impressive Quad Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Vivo X70 Pro promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Realme GT6 Triple Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Vivo X70 Pro in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.
Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 50 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.
Transitioning to the distinctive camera features of both the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro, it becomes apparent that both devices share a notable advantage the incorporation of dedicated Telephoto camera lenses. This shared feature equips both smartphones with the capability for optical zooming, ensuring that users can magnify subjects without sacrificing image quality. The inclusion of dedicated Telephoto lenses in both devices underscores their commitment to providing advanced photography capabilities.
This feature enhances the versatility of the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro, allowing users to capture distant scenes with sharpness and clarity. The parallel inclusion of this special feature reflects a shared emphasis on delivering superior imaging experiences, particularly in situations where optical zoom is paramount for maintaining high quality results.
When discussing front camera features, the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
When look on to front camera features of the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 32 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro stand on equal footing with an 32 MP configuration.
On video recording capabilities, both the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro stand out as excellent choices, sharing the notable feature of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). This technology designed to minimize the impact of shaky movements or vibrations when capturing videos. It employs sensors and actuators to detect and counteract any unintended motion, resulting in smoother and more stable video footage. This feature is particularly beneficial for users who engage in handheld video recording, especially in dynamic or unpredictable environments. The inclusion of OIS in both the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro ensures a high quality video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and steady footage even in challenging conditions.
Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Realme GT6 surpasses the Vivo X70 Pro. The Realme GT6 boasts a substantial 5500 mAh battery, while the Vivo X70 Pro falls slightly behind with a 4450 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Realme GT6 as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Realme GT6 is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Vivo X70 Pro.
In a positive turn of events, both the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Realme GT6 emerges as the superior choice. While the Vivo X70 Pro offers a respectable 44W Fast Charging, the Realme GT6 outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 120W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Realme GT6 as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Realme GT6 provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.
Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Realme GT6 and Vivo X70 Pro, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Realme GT6 has better overall performance than Vivo X70 Pro, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Realme GT6 has a very similar overall performance to Vivo X70 Pro, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo X70 Pro has better overall performance than Realme GT6, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.