Compare Tools :
Date
June 2024
April 2024
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
Unknown
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 14
Android 14
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
Realme UI 5.0
MYUX
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, Tri Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.4, A2DP, LE
5.4, A2DP, LE
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
162 x 75.1 x 8.6 mm
161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
199 g
197 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Plastic, IP65 Rated
Aluminum, IP68 Rated
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Silver, Green
Black, White, Purple
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Adreno 735
Adreno 735
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
8GB / 12GB / 16GB
12GB / 16GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
256GB / 521GB
512GB / 1TB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
-
-
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
6.78"
6.7"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
LTPO AMOLED
P-OLED
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
1264 x 2780 pixels
1220 x 2712 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~450 ppi density, 120Hz
~444 ppi density, 144Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
5500 mAh
4500 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 120W
Fast charging 125W, Wireless fast charging 50W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C & Wireless charging
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Triple Setup
Triple Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.7, OIS, PDAF
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.6, 1/1.3", 1.2µm, OIS, PDAF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Tele) 50 MP, f/2.0, PDAF
(Tele) 64 MP, f/2.4, 0.7µm, OIS, PDAF, 3x optical zoom
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚, 1/4.0", 1.12µm
(Ultrawide) 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚, 0.64µm, AF
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
32 MP, f/2.5
50 MP, f/1.9, 0.64µm, AF
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 4K@60fps / 1080p@240fps
Video Recording 4K@60fps / 1080p@120fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
Stereo Speaker
Stereo Speaker
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
Fingerprint (under display)
Fingerprint (under display)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
Yes
Yes
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $710
~ $1100
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €700
~ €1000
Price in Euros (EUR).
The build quality of the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra surpasses that of the Realme GT6, owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Realme GT6. The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Realme GT6 plastic construction.
Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
In terms of screen protection performance, the Realme GT6 appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.
In the domain of visual quality, the Realme GT6 outshines the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~450, the Realme GT6 surpasses the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, which boasts ~444 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.
A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Realme GT6 elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
In a general perspective, the Realme GT6 equipped with an LTPO AMOLED display panel, and the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also featuring an P-OLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.
When considering the refresh rate feature, the Realme GT6 boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, while the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 144Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.
If we compare the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.
Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Realme GT6 that equipped with Wi-Fi 6, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 7 technology. This distinction positions the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 7 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 6. So, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra with Wi-Fi 7 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Realme GT6, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.4 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Realme GT6 and the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.
Now, Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Considering the specification data, the Realme GT6 is equipped with 8GB / 12GB / 16GB of RAM, while the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra offers a range of 12GB / 16GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Referencing the specifications, Realme GT6 offers internal storage options ranging from 256GB / 521GB, while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra surpasses this with an impressive 512GB / 1TB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, Realme GT6 stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 paired with the Adreno 735. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 735 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Realme GT6, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.
Next, Motorola Edge 50 Ultra stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor and the Adreno 735. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 735 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.
Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is likely to be comparable.
When it comes to optimizing the gaming experience on mobile phones, screen size plays a crucial role in determining visual clarity and immersion. In the context of the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, the Realme GT6 boasts a slightly larger 6.78" screen compared to the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is 6.7" display. This slight difference in size can contribute to a more immersive gaming experience for users. A larger screen provides a more expansive field of view, allowing gamers to perceive in game details with greater clarity and precision. This enhanced visibility becomes particularly important in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential. Additionally, a larger screen can make gaming sessions more enjoyable by offering a more engaging and immersive visual experience.
Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the Realme GT6 boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, while the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes it up a notch with an impressive 144Hz capability. This distinction places the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.
When it comes to the main camera features, both the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra share a common ground, utilizing a Triple Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.
Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 50 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.
Transitioning to the distinctive camera features of both the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it becomes apparent that both devices share a notable advantage the incorporation of dedicated Telephoto camera lenses. This shared feature equips both smartphones with the capability for optical zooming, ensuring that users can magnify subjects without sacrificing image quality. The inclusion of dedicated Telephoto lenses in both devices underscores their commitment to providing advanced photography capabilities.
This feature enhances the versatility of the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, allowing users to capture distant scenes with sharpness and clarity. The parallel inclusion of this special feature reflects a shared emphasis on delivering superior imaging experiences, particularly in situations where optical zoom is paramount for maintaining high quality results.
When discussing front camera features, the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra holds a distinct advantage over the Realme GT6. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra boasts a larger 50 MP front camera, while the Realme GT6 features a 32 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.
On video recording capabilities, both the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra stand out as excellent choices, sharing the notable feature of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). This technology designed to minimize the impact of shaky movements or vibrations when capturing videos. It employs sensors and actuators to detect and counteract any unintended motion, resulting in smoother and more stable video footage. This feature is particularly beneficial for users who engage in handheld video recording, especially in dynamic or unpredictable environments. The inclusion of OIS in both the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra ensures a high quality video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and steady footage even in challenging conditions.
Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Realme GT6 surpasses the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra. The Realme GT6 boasts a substantial 5500 mAh battery, while the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra falls slightly behind with a 4500 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Realme GT6 as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Realme GT6 is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
In a positive development, both the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra emerges as the more advanced choice. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra boasts a Fast Charging capability of 125W, surpassing the Realme GT6 120W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.
Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Realme GT6 and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Realme GT6 has better overall performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Realme GT6 has a very similar overall performance to Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has better overall performance than Realme GT6, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.