Realme GT6

Realme GT6

Triple Setup

199 gram

5500 mAh

Android 14

6.78" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB / 16GB RAM

Black Shark 4S Pro

Black Shark 4S Pro

Triple Setup

220 gram

4500 mAh

Android 11

6.67" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB / 16GB RAM

Announced

Date

June 2024

October 2021

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

KSR-A0

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 11

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Realme UI 5.0

JoyUI 12.5

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G / CDMA / EVDO

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.4, A2DP, LE

5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
100

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

162 x 75.1 x 8.6 mm

163.7 x 76.2 x 9.9 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

199 g

220 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic, IP65 Rated

Aluminum

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Silver, Green

Black, White

Official available body color options.

Score

100
85

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Adreno 735

Adreno 660

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB / 12GB / 16GB

8GB / 12GB / 16GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB / 521GB

256GB / 521GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

-

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.78"

6.67"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

LTPO AMOLED

Super AMOLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1264 x 2780 pixels

1080 x 2400 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~450 ppi density, 120Hz

20:9 ratio, (~395 ppi density), 144Hz, HDR10+

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

5500 mAh

4500 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 120W

Fast charging 120W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.7, OIS, PDAF

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.8, 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Tele) 50 MP, f/2.0, PDAF

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 1/4.0", 1.12µm

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚, 1/4.0", 1.12µm

(Macro) 5 MP, f/2.4, AF

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

32 MP, f/2.5

20 MP, f/2.5, 0.8µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 4K@60fps / 1080p@240fps

Video Recording 4K@60fps / 1080p@240fps / 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

Stereo Speaker

3.5mm jack, Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

Fingerprint (at the side)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $710

~ $825

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €700

~ €730

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The build quality of the Black Shark 4S Pro surpasses that of the Realme GT6, owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Black Shark 4S Pro features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Realme GT6. The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Black Shark 4S Pro aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Realme GT6 plastic construction.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Realme GT6 outshines the Black Shark 4S Pro, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~450, the Realme GT6 surpasses the Black Shark 4S Pro, which boasts ~395 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Realme GT6 elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Black Shark 4S Pro.

In a general perspective, the Realme GT6 equipped with an LTPO AMOLED display panel, and the Black Shark 4S Pro also featuring an Super AMOLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.

When considering the refresh rate feature, the Realme GT6 boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, while the Black Shark 4S Pro takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 144Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 6 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Realme GT6 nor Black Shark 4S Pro holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Realme GT6 is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.4, surpassing the Black Shark 4S Pro, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.2. This condition gives the Realme GT6 a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.4 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.2. Therefore, the Realme GT6 is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Black Shark 4S Pro.

Now, Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Realme GT6 is equipped with 8GB / 12GB / 16GB of RAM, while the Black Shark 4S Pro offers a range of 8GB / 12GB / 16GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Realme GT6 presents a range of 256GB / 521GB of internal memory storage, while Black Shark 4S Pro offers a 256GB / 521GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Realme GT6 stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 paired with the Adreno 735. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 735 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Realme GT6, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Black Shark 4S Pro stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ processor and the Adreno 660. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 660 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Black Shark 4S Pro excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Black Shark 4S Pro emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro is likely to be comparable.

When it comes to optimizing the gaming experience on mobile phones, screen size plays a crucial role in determining visual clarity and immersion. In the context of the Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro, the Realme GT6 boasts a slightly larger 6.78" screen compared to the Black Shark 4S Pro is 6.67" display. This slight difference in size can contribute to a more immersive gaming experience for users. A larger screen provides a more expansive field of view, allowing gamers to perceive in game details with greater clarity and precision. This enhanced visibility becomes particularly important in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential. Additionally, a larger screen can make gaming sessions more enjoyable by offering a more engaging and immersive visual experience.

Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the Realme GT6 boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, while the Black Shark 4S Pro takes it up a notch with an impressive 144Hz capability. This distinction places the Black Shark 4S Pro in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro share a common ground, utilizing a Triple Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Realme GT6 introduces a 50 MP camera, while the Black Shark 4S Pro boasts an impressive 64 MP. In this aspect, the Black Shark 4S Pro holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Realme GT6. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Black Shark 4S Pro, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

Delving more into the camera comparison segment, a notable distinction between the Realme GT6 and the Black Shark 4S Pro surfaces with the inclusion of dedicated Telephoto camera features in the former. The Realme GT6 stands out by incorporating specialized Telephoto lenses that enable optical zooming, a feature absent in the Black Shark 4S Pro. Optical zoom provides a significant advantage over digital zoom as it involves physical movement of the lens elements, allowing users to magnify subjects without compromising image quality.

This results in sharper, more detailed images, particularly in scenarios where capturing distant subjects is crucial. The absence of dedicated Telephoto capabilities in the Black Shark 4S Pro means it relies on digital zoom, which often results in a loss of image quality. Thus, the Realme GT6's inclusion of optical zoom through its Telephoto lenses contributes to an enhanced and versatile photography experience.

When discussing front camera features, the Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Realme GT6 outshines the Black Shark 4S Pro, boasting a significantly higher 32 MP front camera compared to the 20 MP front camera on the Black Shark 4S Pro. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the Realme GT6 stands out as more powerful than the Black Shark 4S Pro, primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Realme GT6, a feature absent in the Black Shark 4S Pro. OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the Black Shark 4S Pro may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The Realme GT6 integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Realme GT6 surpasses the Black Shark 4S Pro. The Realme GT6 boasts a substantial 5500 mAh battery, while the Black Shark 4S Pro falls slightly behind with a 4500 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Realme GT6 as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Realme GT6 is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Black Shark 4S Pro.

In the realm of fast charging features, the Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro stand shoulder to shoulder, as both devices are equipped with the identical Fast Charging 120W capability. This parity in charging technology ensures that users can expect a similar and efficient charging experience from both devices. With neither device holding a distinct advantage in terms of charging speed, the result is a tie. The shared Fast Charging 120W feature positions the Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro on an equal footing, making them both suitable choices for users seeking a reliable and reasonably fast battery charging performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Realme GT6 and Black Shark 4S Pro, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Low quality body material used

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

Benchmark

Point Result

Realme GT6

Build Quality : 100
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Black Shark 4S Pro

Build Quality : 85
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Realme GT6

Realme GT6

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Realme GT6 has better overall performance than Black Shark 4S Pro, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Realme GT6 has a very similar overall performance to Black Shark 4S Pro, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Black Shark 4S Pro

Black Shark 4S Pro

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Black Shark 4S Pro has better overall performance than Realme GT6, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Realme GT6

Realme GT6

Amazon
Black Shark 4S Pro

Black Shark 4S Pro

Amazon