Kyocera Digno SX4

Kyocera Digno SX4

Single Setup

180 gram

4000 mAh

Android 14

5.8" (Inch)


Vivo Y200 (China)

Vivo Y200 (China)

Dual Setup

190 gram

6000 mAh

Android 14

6.78" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM



June 2024

May 2024

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail




Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.



Android 14

Android 14

Operating system type (OS) and version number.


Android Stock UI

OriginOS 4.0

Specific firmware name used on the device.



2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

Available mobile network support options.


Nano SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.



Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.



Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.


5.4, A2DP, LE

5.1, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.


USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.



Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design


157 x 72 x 10.9 mm

164.4 x 74.8 x 8 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).


180 g

190 g

Weight of the device in grams.


Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H


Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, White

Black, White, Orange

Official available body color options.



The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.



MediaTek Dimensity 6100+

Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.


Mali-G57 MC2

Adreno 710

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.



The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.




8GB / 12GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.



128GB / 256GB / 512GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.




Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.



Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display




Screen size in inches.




Type of display panel hardware.


720 x 1560 pixels

1080 x 2400 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.


~296 ppi density

~388 ppi density, 120Hz

Any extra display and screen features if available.



To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.





Type of battery model.


4000 mAh

6000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).



Fast charging 44W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.



A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.



Single Setup

Dual Setup

Total number of rear cameras.


8 MP, AF

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.



(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.




Details of the third camera unit, if available.




Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.


Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.


8 MP

8 MP, f/2.1

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.




Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.


Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.



The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound




Primary sound system type.


3.5mm jack

Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.



For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.



Fingerprint (at the side)

Fingerprint (under display)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.




Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.




Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.


Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.



Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.



~ $180

~ $210

Price in US dollars (USD).


~ €170

~ €200

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown


The Kyocera Digno SX4 stands as a rugged phone, purpose built to excel in challenging environments, while the Vivo Y200 (China) represents a standard smartphone design. When it comes to navigating extreme conditions, the Kyocera Digno SX4 takes the lead, offering superior build quality tailored for durability. Unlike the standard design of the Vivo Y200 (China), the Kyocera Digno SX4 features a reinforced casing constructed from robust materials, ensuring resistance to impacts, drops, and shocks. This enhanced structural integrity equips the Kyocera Digno SX4 to endure the rigors of harsh environments with greater resilience than the Vivo Y200 (China).

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Vivo Y200 (China).

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Kyocera Digno SX4 with its ~296 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Vivo Y200 (China), which boasts an even higher ppi of ~388. The Vivo Y200 (China) gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Vivo Y200 (China), its elevated ppi of ~388 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Kyocera Digno SX4.

In the realm of display hardware, the Kyocera Digno SX4 is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Vivo Y200 (China) boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Vivo Y200 (China) displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.

When considering the refresh rate feature, the Kyocera Digno SX4 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo Y200 (China) takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 120Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Vivo Y200 (China), both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Vivo Y200 (China) on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Kyocera Digno SX4 and Vivo Y200 (China) are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Kyocera Digno SX4 nor Vivo Y200 (China) holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Kyocera Digno SX4 is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.4, surpassing the Vivo Y200 (China), which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.1. This condition gives the Kyocera Digno SX4 a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.4 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.1. Therefore, the Kyocera Digno SX4 is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Vivo Y200 (China).

Leveraging NFC technology, the Kyocera Digno SX4 emerges as the superior choice over the Vivo Y200 (China) due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the Vivo Y200 (China). The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Vivo Y200 (China) hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Kyocera Digno SX4 enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Kyocera Digno SX4 offers a RAM configuration of 4GB, while the Vivo Y200 (China) boasts a more substantial 8GB / 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the Vivo Y200 (China) holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referencing the specifications, Kyocera Digno SX4 offers internal storage options ranging from 64GB, while Vivo Y200 (China) surpasses this with an impressive 128GB / 256GB / 512GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Vivo Y200 (China), allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Vivo Y200 (China) stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.

Differing from the Kyocera Digno SX4, the Vivo Y200 (China) stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Kyocera Digno SX4, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Kyocera Digno SX4 adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ processor coupled with the Mali-G57 MC2. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Kyocera Digno SX4 may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Kyocera Digno SX4 sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, Vivo Y200 (China) stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 processor and the Adreno 710. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 710 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Vivo Y200 (China) excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Vivo Y200 (China) emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Kyocera Digno SX4 comes with less RAM than Vivo Y200 (China). Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Vivo Y200 (China) holds an advantage over the Kyocera Digno SX4 due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Vivo Y200 (China), as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the Kyocera Digno SX4 and the Vivo Y200 (China) may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The Kyocera Digno SX4, equipped with a 5.8" screen, is notably smaller than the Vivo Y200 (China), which boasts a more generous 6.78" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the Vivo Y200 (China), offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the Vivo Y200 (China), with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.

Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the Kyocera Digno SX4 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo Y200 (China) takes it up a notch with an impressive 120Hz capability. This distinction places the Vivo Y200 (China) in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.

Camera Features

Kyocera Digno SX4 appears to be in for some tough competition from the Vivo Y200 (China). While the Kyocera Digno SX4 settles for a Single Setup, the Vivo Y200 (China) takes things up a notch with its impressive Dual Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Vivo Y200 (China) promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Kyocera Digno SX4 Single Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Vivo Y200 (China) in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Kyocera Digno SX4 introduces a 8 MP camera, while the Vivo Y200 (China) boasts an impressive 50 MP. In this aspect, the Vivo Y200 (China) holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Kyocera Digno SX4. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Vivo Y200 (China), often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Vivo Y200 (China) appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Vivo Y200 (China). While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

When look on to front camera features of the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Vivo Y200 (China), a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 8 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Vivo Y200 (China) stand on equal footing with an 8 MP configuration.

Sadly, the both of Kyocera Digno SX4 and Vivo Y200 (China) are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Vivo Y200 (China) may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Substantial contrast in battery capacity between the Kyocera Digno SX4 and the Vivo Y200 (China), with the Vivo Y200 (China) boasting an impressive 6000 mAh compared to the Kyocera Digno SX4 6000 mAh, significantly impacts their overall performance. In this scenario, the larger battery in the Vivo Y200 (China) proves advantageous for several reasons. A bigger battery translates to a higher energy reservoir, allowing the device to sustain prolonged usage without requiring frequent recharges. This is particularly beneficial for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day, ensuring that the Vivo Y200 (China) can provide a longer lasting and more dependable power supply.

Then, if we comparing the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Vivo Y200 (China), it becomes evident that the Vivo Y200 (China) holds a significant advantage. The Vivo Y200 (China) is equipped with Fast Charging 44W features, a noteworthy capability absent in the Kyocera Digno SX4. This distinction gives the Vivo Y200 (China) a clear edge in terms of charging efficiency. With its faster charging technology, the Vivo Y200 (China) ensures a more rapid replenishment of the battery compared to the Kyocera Digno SX4. In scenarios where quick charging is a priority, the Vivo Y200 (China) stands out as a superior choice, offering users a more expedited charging experience without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Vivo Y200 (China), as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.


Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • NFC capability
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function


Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • No fast charging feature supported
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Relatively small internal memory capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version


Point Result

Kyocera Digno SX4

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 80
Performance : 95
Memory : 95
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 85
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Vivo Y200 (China)

Build Quality : 75
Display : 100
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 90
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Kyocera Digno SX4

Kyocera Digno SX4

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Kyocera Digno SX4 has better overall performance than Vivo Y200 (China), based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Kyocera Digno SX4 has a very similar overall performance to Vivo Y200 (China), based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Vivo Y200 (China)

Vivo Y200 (China)

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo Y200 (China) has better overall performance than Kyocera Digno SX4, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Kyocera Digno SX4

Kyocera Digno SX4

Vivo Y200 (China)

Vivo Y200 (China)