Kyocera Digno SX4

Kyocera Digno SX4

Single Setup

180 gram

4000 mAh

Android 14

5.8" (Inch)


Poco Pad

Poco Pad

Single Setup

571 gram

10000 mAh

Android 14

12.1" (Inch)




June 2024

May 2024

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail




Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.



Android 14

Android 14

Operating system type (OS) and version number.


Android Stock UI


Specific firmware name used on the device.



2G / 3G / 4G / 5G


Available mobile network support options.


Nano SIM


Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.



Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.



Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.


5.4, A2DP, LE

5.2, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.


USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.



Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design


157 x 72 x 10.9 mm

280 x 181.8 x 7.5 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).


180 g

571 g

Weight of the device in grams.


Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H


Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, White

Gray, Blue

Official available body color options.



The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.



MediaTek Dimensity 6100+

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.


Mali-G57 MC2

Adreno 710

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.



The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.





Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.




Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.




Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.



Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display




Screen size in inches.




Type of display panel hardware.


720 x 1560 pixels

1600 x 2560 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.


~296 ppi density

~249 ppi density, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass 3

Any extra display and screen features if available.



To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.





Type of battery model.


4000 mAh

10000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).



Fast charging 33W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.



A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.



Single Setup

Single Setup

Total number of rear cameras.


8 MP, AF

8 MP, f/2.0, 1.12μm, AF

Details of the main camera unit.




Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.




Details of the third camera unit, if available.




Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.


Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.


8 MP

8 MP, f/2.2, 1.12μm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.




Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.


Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.



The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound




Primary sound system type.


3.5mm jack

3.5mm jack, Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.



For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.



Fingerprint (at the side)


Biometric security hardware model, if available.




Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.




Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.


Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.



Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.



~ $180

~ $330

Price in US dollars (USD).


~ €170

~ €320

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown


The Kyocera Digno SX4 stands as a rugged phone, purpose built to excel in challenging environments, while the Poco Pad represents a standard smartphone design. When it comes to navigating extreme conditions, the Kyocera Digno SX4 takes the lead, offering superior build quality tailored for durability. Unlike the standard design of the Poco Pad, the Kyocera Digno SX4 features a reinforced casing constructed from robust materials, ensuring resistance to impacts, drops, and shocks. This enhanced structural integrity equips the Kyocera Digno SX4 to endure the rigors of harsh environments with greater resilience than the Poco Pad.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad.

In terms of screen protection performance, the Kyocera Digno SX4 appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Poco Pad distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Poco Pad not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Kyocera Digno SX4 outshines the Poco Pad, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~296, the Kyocera Digno SX4 surpasses the Poco Pad, which boasts ~249 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Kyocera Digno SX4 elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Poco Pad.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad.

When considering the refresh rate feature, the Kyocera Digno SX4 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Poco Pad takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 120Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.

Connectivity Features

Comparing the Kyocera Digno SX4 that comes with 5G network capabilities, to the Poco Pad which lacks mobile SIM network support, underscores a clear advantage for the Kyocera Digno SX4. In circumstances where users prioritize the use of mobile SIM features on their devices, the Kyocera Digno SX4 stands out as the preferable choice. The absence of mobile SIM network support in the Poco Pad may limit its functionality for users seeking seamless connectivity through mobile networks. Consequently the Kyocera Digno SX4 emerges as the superior option in this particular aspect of comparison.

Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Kyocera Digno SX4 that equipped with Wi-Fi 5, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Poco Pad which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 6 technology. This distinction positions the Poco Pad at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 6 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 5. So, the Poco Pad with Wi-Fi 6 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Kyocera Digno SX4, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Kyocera Digno SX4 is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.4, surpassing the Poco Pad, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.2. This condition gives the Kyocera Digno SX4 a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.4 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.2. Therefore, the Kyocera Digno SX4 is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Poco Pad.

Leveraging NFC technology, the Kyocera Digno SX4 emerges as the superior choice over the Poco Pad due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the Poco Pad. The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Poco Pad hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Kyocera Digno SX4 enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Kyocera Digno SX4 offers a RAM configuration of 4GB, while the Poco Pad boasts a more substantial 8GB RAM range. Clearly, the Poco Pad holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referencing the specifications, Kyocera Digno SX4 offers internal storage options ranging from 64GB, while Poco Pad surpasses this with an impressive 256GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Poco Pad, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Poco Pad stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.

Differing from the Kyocera Digno SX4, the Poco Pad stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Kyocera Digno SX4, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Kyocera Digno SX4 adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ processor coupled with the Mali-G57 MC2. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Kyocera Digno SX4 may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Kyocera Digno SX4 sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, Poco Pad features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 processor and Adreno 710. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and Adreno 710 tandem enables the Poco Pad to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Kyocera Digno SX4 comes with less RAM than Poco Pad. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Poco Pad holds an advantage over the Kyocera Digno SX4 due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Poco Pad, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the Kyocera Digno SX4 and the Poco Pad may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The Kyocera Digno SX4, equipped with a 5.8" screen, is notably smaller than the Poco Pad, which boasts a more generous 12.1" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the Poco Pad, offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the Poco Pad, with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.

Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the Kyocera Digno SX4 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Poco Pad takes it up a notch with an impressive 120Hz capability. This distinction places the Poco Pad in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad share a common ground, utilizing a Single Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 8 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.

When discussing front camera features, the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

When look on to front camera features of the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 8 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad stand on equal footing with an 8 MP configuration.

Sadly, the both of Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Substantial contrast in battery capacity between the Kyocera Digno SX4 and the Poco Pad, with the Poco Pad boasting an impressive 10000 mAh compared to the Kyocera Digno SX4 10000 mAh, significantly impacts their overall performance. In this scenario, the larger battery in the Poco Pad proves advantageous for several reasons. A bigger battery translates to a higher energy reservoir, allowing the device to sustain prolonged usage without requiring frequent recharges. This is particularly beneficial for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day, ensuring that the Poco Pad can provide a longer lasting and more dependable power supply.

Then, if we comparing the Kyocera Digno SX4 and Poco Pad, it becomes evident that the Poco Pad holds a significant advantage. The Poco Pad is equipped with Fast Charging 33W features, a noteworthy capability absent in the Kyocera Digno SX4. This distinction gives the Poco Pad a clear edge in terms of charging efficiency. With its faster charging technology, the Poco Pad ensures a more rapid replenishment of the battery compared to the Kyocera Digno SX4. In scenarios where quick charging is a priority, the Poco Pad stands out as a superior choice, offering users a more expedited charging experience without compromising on performance.

Security Features

At the security features, Kyocera Digno SX4 demonstrates superiority over Poco Pad, primarily owing to its incorporation of a dedicated biometric sensor designed to enhance the device security. This contrasts sharply with Poco Pad, which lacks a dedicated biometric sensor, resulting in all security measures remaining at a standard level. The absence of a specialized security sensor on Poco Pad places it at a disadvantage, as Kyocera Digno SX4 provides users with an elevated and secure means of device access and authentication through its dedicated biometric feature.


Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • NFC capability
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Stereo speaker function


Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • No fast charging feature supported
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Relatively small internal memory capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Mobile network not available
  • No SIM Card function supported


Point Result

Kyocera Digno SX4

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 80
Performance : 95
Memory : 95
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 85
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Poco Pad

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 80
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 70
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 80
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Kyocera Digno SX4

Kyocera Digno SX4

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Kyocera Digno SX4 has better overall performance than Poco Pad, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Kyocera Digno SX4 has a very similar overall performance to Poco Pad, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Poco Pad

Poco Pad

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Poco Pad has better overall performance than Kyocera Digno SX4, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Kyocera Digno SX4

Kyocera Digno SX4

Poco Pad

Poco Pad