Oukitel WP50

Oukitel WP50

Triple Setup

286 gram

6500 mAh

Android 14

6.6" (Inch)

4GB RAM

Vivo Y200 GT

Vivo Y200 GT

Dual Setup

194.6 gram

6000 mAh

Android 14

6.78" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Announced

Date

June 2024

May 2024

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

V2361GA

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 14

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

OriginOS 4.0

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE

5.4, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
100

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

172.2 x 80 x 12.4 mm

163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

286 g

194.6 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H

Plastic, IP64 Rated

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, Blue

Black, Blue

Official available body color options.

Score

100
100

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Dimensity 6100+

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G57 MC2

Adreno 720

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

95
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

4GB

8GB / 12GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.6"

6.78"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

AMOLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

720 x 1612 pixels

1260 x 2800 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~267 ppi density

~453 ppi density, 144Hz

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

6500 mAh

6000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 18W

Fast charging 80W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Dual Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 48 MP, PDAF

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Tele) 20 MP

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Depth) 0.3 MP

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

8 MP

16 MP, f/2.5

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
85

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the side)

Fingerprint (under display)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $160

~ $240

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €150

~ €230

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The Oukitel WP50 stands as a rugged phone, purpose built to excel in challenging environments, while the Vivo Y200 GT represents a standard smartphone design. When it comes to navigating extreme conditions, the Oukitel WP50 takes the lead, offering superior build quality tailored for durability. Unlike the standard design of the Vivo Y200 GT, the Oukitel WP50 features a reinforced casing constructed from robust materials, ensuring resistance to impacts, drops, and shocks. This enhanced structural integrity equips the Oukitel WP50 to endure the rigors of harsh environments with greater resilience than the Vivo Y200 GT.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Oukitel WP50 and Vivo Y200 GT.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Oukitel WP50 with its ~267 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Vivo Y200 GT, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~453. The Vivo Y200 GT gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Vivo Y200 GT, its elevated ppi of ~453 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Oukitel WP50.

In the realm of display hardware, the Oukitel WP50 is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Vivo Y200 GT boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Vivo Y200 GT displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.

When considering the refresh rate feature, the Oukitel WP50 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo Y200 GT takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 144Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Oukitel WP50 and Vivo Y200 GT, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Oukitel WP50 and Vivo Y200 GT on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Oukitel WP50 that equipped with Wi-Fi 5, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Vivo Y200 GT which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 6 technology. This distinction positions the Vivo Y200 GT at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 6 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 5. So, the Vivo Y200 GT with Wi-Fi 6 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Oukitel WP50, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Oukitel WP50 equipped with Bluetooth 5.2, while the Vivo Y200 GT comes with more latest Bluetooth 5.4 technology. In this scenario, Vivo Y200 GT holds a technological advantage by adopting the more recent Bluetooth technology. Bluetooth 5.4 brings improvements in terms of enhanced services, better connection performance, and increased accuracy in device positioning. Therefore, the integration of Bluetooth 5.4 in the Vivo Y200 GT positions it as the superior choice in Bluetooth technology, offering users a more advanced experience when compared with the Oukitel WP50.

Now, Oukitel WP50 and Vivo Y200 GT stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Oukitel WP50 offers a RAM configuration of 4GB, while the Vivo Y200 GT boasts a more substantial 8GB / 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the Vivo Y200 GT holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referencing the specifications, Oukitel WP50 offers internal storage options ranging from 256GB, while Vivo Y200 GT surpasses this with an impressive 128GB / 256GB / 512GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Vivo Y200 GT, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Vivo Y200 GT stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Oukitel WP50 adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ processor coupled with the Mali-G57 MC2. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Oukitel WP50 may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Oukitel WP50 sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, Vivo Y200 GT stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 processor and the Adreno 720. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 720 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Vivo Y200 GT excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Vivo Y200 GT emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Oukitel WP50 comes with less RAM than Vivo Y200 GT. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Vivo Y200 GT holds an advantage over the Oukitel WP50 due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Vivo Y200 GT, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Oukitel WP50 is equipped with a 6.6" screen, slightly smaller than the Vivo Y200 GT, which boasts a 6.78" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The Vivo Y200 GT marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.

Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the Oukitel WP50 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo Y200 GT takes it up a notch with an impressive 144Hz capability. This distinction places the Vivo Y200 GT in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.

Camera Features

The main camera setup of the Oukitel WP50 surpasses that Vivo Y200 GT, offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The Oukitel WP50 boasts Triple Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the Vivo Y200 GT falls behind with its Dual Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the Oukitel WP50 enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Oukitel WP50 introduces a 48 MP camera, while the Vivo Y200 GT boasts an impressive 50 MP. In this aspect, the Vivo Y200 GT holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Oukitel WP50. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Vivo Y200 GT, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

Delving more into the camera comparison segment, a notable distinction between the Oukitel WP50 and the Vivo Y200 GT surfaces with the inclusion of dedicated Telephoto camera features in the former. The Oukitel WP50 stands out by incorporating specialized Telephoto lenses that enable optical zooming, a feature absent in the Vivo Y200 GT. Optical zoom provides a significant advantage over digital zoom as it involves physical movement of the lens elements, allowing users to magnify subjects without compromising image quality.

This results in sharper, more detailed images, particularly in scenarios where capturing distant subjects is crucial. The absence of dedicated Telephoto capabilities in the Vivo Y200 GT means it relies on digital zoom, which often results in a loss of image quality. Thus, the Oukitel WP50's inclusion of optical zoom through its Telephoto lenses contributes to an enhanced and versatile photography experience.

When discussing front camera features, the Oukitel WP50 and Vivo Y200 GT appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Oukitel WP50 and Vivo Y200 GT. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Vivo Y200 GT holds a distinct advantage over the Oukitel WP50. The Vivo Y200 GT boasts a larger 16 MP front camera, while the Oukitel WP50 features a 8 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Vivo Y200 GT provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Sadly, the both of Oukitel WP50 and Vivo Y200 GT are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Oukitel WP50 and Vivo Y200 GT may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Oukitel WP50 surpasses the Vivo Y200 GT. The Oukitel WP50 boasts a substantial 6500 mAh battery, while the Vivo Y200 GT falls slightly behind with a 6000 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Oukitel WP50 as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Oukitel WP50 is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Vivo Y200 GT.

In a positive development, both the Oukitel WP50 and Vivo Y200 GT incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Vivo Y200 GT emerges as the more advanced choice. The Vivo Y200 GT boasts a Fast Charging capability of 80W, surpassing the Oukitel WP50 18W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Vivo Y200 GT as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Vivo Y200 GT ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Oukitel WP50 and Vivo Y200 GT, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

Benchmark

Point Result

Oukitel WP50

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 90
Performance : 95
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Vivo Y200 GT

Build Quality : 100
Display : 100
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Oukitel WP50

Oukitel WP50

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Oukitel WP50 has better overall performance than Vivo Y200 GT, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Oukitel WP50 has a very similar overall performance to Vivo Y200 GT, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Vivo Y200 GT

Vivo Y200 GT

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo Y200 GT has better overall performance than Oukitel WP50, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Oukitel WP50

Oukitel WP50

Amazon
Vivo Y200 GT

Vivo Y200 GT

Amazon