Durability

Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Teclast M50S with its ~149 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Infinix Hot 12i, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~267. The Infinix Hot 12i gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Infinix Hot 12i, its elevated ppi of ~267 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Teclast M50S.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Teclast M50S and the Infinix Hot 12i align with their 60Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Teclast M50S and the Infinix Hot 12i find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

Comparing the Teclast M50S that which lacks mobile SIM support, with the Infinix Hot 12i boasting 4G capabilities, reveals a notable disparity. The absence of mobile SIM support in the Teclast M50S places it at a distinct disadvantage, especially for those reliant on seamless connectivity through mobile networks. In situations where users prioritize mobile SIM features, the Infinix Hot 12i emerges as the preferred choice.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Teclast M50S nor Infinix Hot 12i holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.0 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Teclast M50S and the Infinix Hot 12i, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Unfortunately, both the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i lack NFC features, resulting in a tie between them. The absence of NFC constrains these devices in terms of modern connectivity and functionality. NFC serves as a wireless technology that enables seamless data exchange between devices in close proximity, offering diverse applications such as contactless payments, swift file sharing, and simplified pairing with other compatible devices. Consequently, users of Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i may encounter limitations in fully exploiting the potential for hassle free connectivity.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Teclast M50S is equipped with 4GB of RAM, while the Infinix Hot 12i offers a range of 2GB / 3GB / 4GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Teclast M50S emerges as the superior choice over Infinix Hot 12i, evident in its internal memory configuration of 128GB, surpassing the 64GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Teclast M50S higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Differing from the Teclast M50S, the Infinix Hot 12i stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Teclast M50S, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Teclast M50S adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the Unisoc T606 processor coupled with the Mali-G57. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Teclast M50S may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Teclast M50S sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, Infinix Hot 12i is equipped with entry-level hardware, featuring the Mediatek Helio A22 processor and PowerVR GE8320. While not tailored for hardcore gaming enthusiasts, this device still holds its ground for casual gaming experiences. The combination of the Mediatek Helio A22 and PowerVR GE8320 allows the Infinix Hot 12i to handle less graphics intensive games smoothly and efficiently. However, its technical specifications suggest that it might struggle with the demands of high-end, resource intensive gaming. Nevertheless, for users looking for a budget friendly smartphone that can handle everyday tasks and provide a decent gaming experience at lower to mid-level graphic settings, the Infinix Hot 12i remains a viable and cost effective option.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i is likely to be comparable.

For an optimal gaming experience, the Teclast M50S distinguishes itself with its notably larger 10.1" screen, surpassing the Infinix Hot 12i, which features a comparatively smaller 6.6" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i stand on equal footing with identical 60Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 60Hz refresh rate shared by Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

Teclast M50S appears to be in for some tough competition from the Infinix Hot 12i. While the Teclast M50S settles for a Dual Setup, the Infinix Hot 12i takes things up a notch with its impressive Triple Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Infinix Hot 12i promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Teclast M50S Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Infinix Hot 12i in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 13 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.

When discussing front camera features, the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Infinix Hot 12i holds a distinct advantage over the Teclast M50S. The Infinix Hot 12i boasts a larger 8 MP front camera, while the Teclast M50S features a 5 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Infinix Hot 12i provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Sadly, the both of Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Assessment of battery capacity performance between the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i is currently impeded due to a shortage of data. The absence of comprehensive information prevents an accurate comparison at this point. Patience is advised as we await the completion of data collection, which is crucial for a thorough evaluation of the two devices. Only with a comprehensive dataset can a final and informed judgment be made regarding the battery capabilities of the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i, allowing consumers to make well-informed decisions based on reliable information.

Talking on fast charging capabilities, the Teclast M50S and Infinix Hot 12i share a similar standing, as neither device is equipped with a fast charging feature. With both smartphones relying solely on standard charging methods, the absence of rapid charging technology levels the playing field. Consequently, users can expect a comparable charging experience from both the Teclast M50S and the Infinix Hot 12i, eliminating any significant advantage in this aspect. The absence of fast charging features positions the devices on equal footing, resulting in a tie when it comes to evaluating their charging capabilities.

Security Features

At the security features, it becomes evident that the Teclast M50S falls short in comparison to the Infinix Hot 12i. The Teclast M50S lacks any dedicated biometric sensor, a notable distinction from the Infinix Hot 12i, where a dedicated biometric sensor is present. This disparity underscores that, in terms of security, the Infinix Hot 12i holds a distinct advantage over the Teclast M50S. The absence of a dedicated biometric sensor on the Teclast M50S emphasizes the Infinix Hot 12i superior security features, offering users a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.