Compare Tools :
Date
June 2024
December 2022
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
Unknown
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 14
Android 12
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
Android Stock UI
Android Stock UI
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
-
2G / 3G / 4G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
-
Dual SIM, Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.0, A2DP, LE
5.2, A2DP, LE
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
( ? )
160.9 x 80 x 12.2 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
460 g
270 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Plastic
Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Blue
Black, Green
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
Unisoc T606
MediaTek Helio G99
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Mali-G57
Mali-G57 MC2
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
4GB
4GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
128GB
64GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
MicroSDXC
MicroSDXC
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
10.1"
6.1"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
IPS LCD
IPS LCD
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
800 x 1280 pixels
720 x 1560 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~149 ppi density
~282 ppi density, Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
( ? )
5000 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
-
Fast charging 30W, Wireless fast charging 15W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C & Wireless charging
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Dual Setup
Dual Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 13 MP, AF
(Main) 48 MP, f/1.8, AF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Depth) 0.08 MP
(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
5 MP
16 MP, f/2.0
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 720p@30fps
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
3.5mm jack
3.5mm jack
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
-
Fingerprint (at the side)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
-
Yes
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $130
~ $310
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €120
~ €300
Price in Euros (EUR).
The Teclast M50S stands as a conventional smartphone, whereas the Gigaset GX4 emerges as a rugged phone designed to outperform in challenging conditions. When evaluating build quality for extreme conditions, the Gigaset GX4 stands out as the superior choice.
In contrast to the standard design of the Teclast M50S, the Gigaset GX4 boasts a reinforced and robust build, featuring durable materials that enhance its resistance to impacts, drops, water, dust, and shocks. This rugged design ensures that the Gigaset GX4 excels in environments where the Teclast M50S may falter, providing users with a durable and reliable device capable of withstanding the rigors of harsh conditions. Whether facing adverse weather or demanding outdoor scenarios, the build quality of the Gigaset GX4 positions it as the preferred option for users seeking a phone that exceeds conventional limits, ensuring durability and functionality in extreme conditions.
Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4.
In terms of screen protection performance, the Teclast M50S appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Gigaset GX4 distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Gigaset GX4 not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.
In terms of visual quality performance, the Teclast M50S with its ~149 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Gigaset GX4, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~282. The Gigaset GX4 gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.
This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Gigaset GX4, its elevated ppi of ~282 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Teclast M50S.
In the realm of display panel technology, the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4 share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4.
From the screen refresh rate features, the Teclast M50S and the Gigaset GX4 align with their 60Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Teclast M50S and the Gigaset GX4 find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.
Comparing the Teclast M50S that which lacks mobile SIM support, with the Gigaset GX4 boasting 4G capabilities, reveals a notable disparity. The absence of mobile SIM support in the Teclast M50S places it at a distinct disadvantage, especially for those reliant on seamless connectivity through mobile networks. In situations where users prioritize mobile SIM features, the Gigaset GX4 emerges as the preferred choice.
Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4 are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Teclast M50S nor Gigaset GX4 holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Teclast M50S equipped with Bluetooth 5.0, while the Gigaset GX4 comes with more latest Bluetooth 5.2 technology. In this scenario, Gigaset GX4 holds a technological advantage by adopting the more recent Bluetooth technology. Bluetooth 5.2 brings improvements in terms of enhanced services, better connection performance, and increased accuracy in device positioning. Therefore, the integration of Bluetooth 5.2 in the Gigaset GX4 positions it as the superior choice in Bluetooth technology, offering users a more advanced experience when compared with the Teclast M50S.
From the NFC technology perspective, Teclast M50S lacks the NFC feature, while the Gigaset GX4 comes equipped with it, making the Gigaset GX4 notably superior. The NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless technology facilitating smooth data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Teclast M50S restricts its capabilities for convenient applications like quick file sharing, contactless payments, and seamless connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. Conversely, the inclusion of NFC in the Gigaset GX4 enhances its versatility, providing users with an extended range of applications.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Considering the specification data, the Teclast M50S is equipped with 4GB of RAM, while the Gigaset GX4 offers a range of 4GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Referring to the specification data, Teclast M50S emerges as the superior choice over Gigaset GX4, evident in its internal memory configuration of 128GB, surpassing the 64GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Teclast M50S higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.
Highlighting a notable distinction, the Gigaset GX4 introduces an interesting feature by incorporating external memory expansion, a capability notably absent in the Teclast M50S. This feature proves advantageous for users seeking enhanced storage flexibility. With external memory expansion, Gigaset GX4 users can easily amplify their device storage by adding a compatible external memory card. This becomes particularly beneficial for individuals who require additional space for storing diverse data, be it large files, multimedia content, or extra applications. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to tailor and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, offering a practical solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, The Teclast M50S adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the Unisoc T606 processor coupled with the Mali-G57. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Teclast M50S may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Teclast M50S sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.
Next, Gigaset GX4 is equipped with entry-level hardware, featuring the MediaTek Helio G99 processor and Mali-G57 MC2. While not tailored for hardcore gaming enthusiasts, this device still holds its ground for casual gaming experiences. The combination of the MediaTek Helio G99 and Mali-G57 MC2 allows the Gigaset GX4 to handle less graphics intensive games smoothly and efficiently. However, its technical specifications suggest that it might struggle with the demands of high-end, resource intensive gaming. Nevertheless, for users looking for a budget friendly smartphone that can handle everyday tasks and provide a decent gaming experience at lower to mid-level graphic settings, the Gigaset GX4 remains a viable and cost effective option.
Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4 may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4 is likely to be comparable.
For an optimal gaming experience, the Teclast M50S distinguishes itself with its notably larger 10.1" screen, surpassing the Gigaset GX4, which features a comparatively smaller 6.1" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.
Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4 stand on equal footing with identical 60Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 60Hz refresh rate shared by Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4 ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.
When it comes to the main camera features, both the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4 share a common ground, utilizing a Dual Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4 provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.
Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Teclast M50S introduces a 13 MP camera, while the Gigaset GX4 boasts an impressive 48 MP. In this aspect, the Gigaset GX4 holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Teclast M50S. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.
This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Gigaset GX4, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.
When discussing front camera features, the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Gigaset GX4 holds a distinct advantage over the Teclast M50S. The Gigaset GX4 boasts a larger 16 MP front camera, while the Teclast M50S features a 5 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Gigaset GX4 provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.
Sadly, the both of Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4 are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4 may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.
Assessment of battery capacity performance between the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4 is currently impeded due to a shortage of data. The absence of comprehensive information prevents an accurate comparison at this point. Patience is advised as we await the completion of data collection, which is crucial for a thorough evaluation of the two devices. Only with a comprehensive dataset can a final and informed judgment be made regarding the battery capabilities of the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4, allowing consumers to make well-informed decisions based on reliable information.
Then, if we comparing the Teclast M50S and Gigaset GX4, it becomes evident that the Gigaset GX4 holds a significant advantage. The Gigaset GX4 is equipped with Fast Charging 30W features, a noteworthy capability absent in the Teclast M50S. This distinction gives the Gigaset GX4 a clear edge in terms of charging efficiency. With its faster charging technology, the Gigaset GX4 ensures a more rapid replenishment of the battery compared to the Teclast M50S. In scenarios where quick charging is a priority, the Gigaset GX4 stands out as a superior choice, offering users a more expedited charging experience without compromising on performance.
At the security features, it becomes evident that the Teclast M50S falls short in comparison to the Gigaset GX4. The Teclast M50S lacks any dedicated biometric sensor, a notable distinction from the Gigaset GX4, where a dedicated biometric sensor is present. This disparity underscores that, in terms of security, the Gigaset GX4 holds a distinct advantage over the Teclast M50S. The absence of a dedicated biometric sensor on the Teclast M50S emphasizes the Gigaset GX4 superior security features, offering users a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Teclast M50S has better overall performance than Gigaset GX4, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Teclast M50S has a very similar overall performance to Gigaset GX4, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Gigaset GX4 has better overall performance than Teclast M50S, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.