Durability

The build quality of the Google Pixel 5 surpasses that of the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G, owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Google Pixel 5 features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G. The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Google Pixel 5 aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G plastic construction.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5.

In terms of screen protection performance, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Google Pixel 5 distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Google Pixel 5 not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G with its ~396 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Google Pixel 5, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~432. The Google Pixel 5 gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Google Pixel 5, its elevated ppi of ~432 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G.

In the realm of display hardware, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Google Pixel 5 boasts a brilliant OLED display. The advantages of OLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Google Pixel 5 displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and the Google Pixel 5, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Google Pixel 5 with 90Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G with 120Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5 on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5 are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G nor Google Pixel 5 holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.3, surpassing the Google Pixel 5, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.0. This condition gives the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.3 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.0. Therefore, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Google Pixel 5.

Now, Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5 stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G is equipped with 8GB of RAM, while the Google Pixel 5 offers a range of 8GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G emerges as the superior choice over Google Pixel 5, evident in its internal memory configuration of 256GB, surpassing the 128GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G boasts a formidable combination of the Mediatek Dimensity 6080 processor and Mali-G57 MC2, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the Mediatek Dimensity 6080 and Mali-G57 MC2 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Google Pixel 5 features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G processor and Adreno 620. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and Adreno 620 tandem enables the Google Pixel 5 to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5 may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5 is likely to be comparable.

For an optimal gaming experience, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G distinguishes itself with its notably larger 6.78" screen, surpassing the Google Pixel 5, which features a comparatively smaller 6.0" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Google Pixel 5 that only comes with 90Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5 share a common ground, utilizing a Dual Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5 provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G emerges as a standout against the Google Pixel 5, showcasing an impressive 108 MP camera, while the Google Pixel 5 only comes with 12 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

When look on to front camera features of the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 8 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5 stand on equal footing with an 8 MP configuration.

Next, In the realm of video recording, a noteworthy distinction arises between the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and the Google Pixel 5. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G is a significant limitation when compared to the Google Pixel 5, which incorporates OIS technology. OIS plays a crucial role in reducing unwanted motion and vibrations during video recording, resulting in smoother and more professionally captured footage. In practical terms, this means that the Google Pixel 5 can deliver more stable and visually appealing videos, especially in situations where there might be hand movements or external disturbances. The inclusion of OIS in the Google Pixel 5 contributes to a superior video recording experience, making it a more desirable choice for users who prioritize high quality and steady video footage over time.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G surpasses the Google Pixel 5. The Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G boasts a substantial 5000 mAh battery, while the Google Pixel 5 falls slightly behind with a 4080 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Google Pixel 5.

In a positive turn of events, both the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5 come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G emerges as the superior choice. While the Google Pixel 5 offers a respectable 18W Fast Charging, the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 33W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Tecno Spark 20 Pro 5G and Google Pixel 5, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.