HTC U24 Pro

HTC U24 Pro

Triple Setup

198.7 gram

4600 mAh

Android 14

6.8" (Inch)

12GB RAM

Oukitel WP38

Oukitel WP38

Dual Setup

( ? )ram

10600 mAh

Android 13

6.52" (Inch)

6GB RAM

Announced

Date

June 2024

May 2024

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

Unknown

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 13

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

Android Stock UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, Tri Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.3, A2DP, LE

4.2, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

167.1 x 74.9 x 9 mm

( ? )

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

198.7 g

( ? )

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Aluminum, IP67 Rated

Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Blue, White

Black

Official available body color options.

Score

100
100

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3

MediaTek MT8788

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Adreno 720

Mali-G72 MP3

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

12GB

6GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB / 521GB

256GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

-

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.8"

6.52"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

OLED

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2436 pixels

720 x 1600 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~392 ppi density, 120Hz

~269 ppi density

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

4600 mAh

10600 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 60W, Wireless fast charging 15W

-

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C & Wireless charging

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
85

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Dual Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, PDAF

(Main) 13 MP, AF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Tele) 50 MP, f/2.0, PDAF, 2x optical zoom

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 1.12µm

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

50 MP, f/2.5, AF

5 MP

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 720p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
85

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

-

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
85

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

Fingerprint (at the back)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $570

~ $120

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €560

~ €110

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The HTC U24 Pro stands as a conventional smartphone, whereas the Oukitel WP38 emerges as a rugged phone designed to outperform in challenging conditions. When evaluating build quality for extreme conditions, the Oukitel WP38 stands out as the superior choice.

In contrast to the standard design of the HTC U24 Pro, the Oukitel WP38 boasts a reinforced and robust build, featuring durable materials that enhance its resistance to impacts, drops, water, dust, and shocks. This rugged design ensures that the Oukitel WP38 excels in environments where the HTC U24 Pro may falter, providing users with a durable and reliable device capable of withstanding the rigors of harsh conditions. Whether facing adverse weather or demanding outdoor scenarios, the build quality of the Oukitel WP38 positions it as the preferred option for users seeking a phone that exceeds conventional limits, ensuring durability and functionality in extreme conditions.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the HTC U24 Pro and Oukitel WP38.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the HTC U24 Pro outshines the Oukitel WP38, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~392, the HTC U24 Pro surpasses the Oukitel WP38, which boasts ~269 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the HTC U24 Pro elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Oukitel WP38.

In terms of display hardware, the HTC U24 Pro stands out with its OLED technology display, presenting a significant advantage over the Oukitel WP38, which incorporates an IPS LCD screen. The HTC U24 Pro with OLED technology excels in providing superior visual performance, marked by vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and higher contrast ratios. The architecture of OLED displays involves the emission of light individually from each pixel, facilitating precise control and achieving true blacks by completely turning off pixels. This characteristic contributes to a more immersive viewing experience characterized by enhanced color accuracy and sharpness.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the HTC U24 Pro and the Oukitel WP38, the HTC U24 Pro emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Oukitel WP38 with 60Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The HTC U24 Pro with 120Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

Comparing HTC U24 Pro equipped with 5G features to Oukitel WP38 with only 4G capabilities highlights a distinct advantage for HTC U24 Pro. The incorporation of 5G technology positions HTC U24 Pro as a more future proof device, offering faster data speeds and improved connectivity. In contrast, the limited 4G capabilities of Oukitel WP38 may result in a comparatively slower and less efficient network experience. Consequently in this context, HTC U24 Pro emerges as the superior option, providing a more modern and technologically advanced mobile experience compared to Oukitel WP38.

Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the HTC U24 Pro and Oukitel WP38. First, the HTC U24 Pro features Wi-Fi 6e, while Oukitel WP38 utilizes by Wi-Fi 5 technology. From a technical standpoint, HTC U24 Pro holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 6e offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 5. Consequently, the HTC U24 Pro ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Oukitel WP38.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the HTC U24 Pro is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.3, surpassing the Oukitel WP38, which only utilizes Bluetooth 4.2. This condition gives the HTC U24 Pro a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.3 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 4.2. Therefore, the HTC U24 Pro is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Oukitel WP38.

Now, HTC U24 Pro and Oukitel WP38 stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, HTC U24 Pro boasts 12GB of RAM, surpassing Oukitel WP38 offering 6GB RAM. In this scenario, HTC U24 Pro holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, HTC U24 Pro emerges as the superior choice over Oukitel WP38, evident in its internal memory configuration of 256GB / 521GB, surpassing the 256GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. HTC U24 Pro higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, HTC U24 Pro stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 paired with the Adreno 720. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 720 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the HTC U24 Pro, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Oukitel WP38 features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the MediaTek MT8788 processor and Mali-G72 MP3. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the MediaTek MT8788 and Mali-G72 MP3 tandem enables the Oukitel WP38 to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between HTC U24 Pro and Oukitel WP38 suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like HTC U24 Pro can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

For an optimal gaming experience, the HTC U24 Pro distinguishes itself with its notably larger 6.8" screen, surpassing the Oukitel WP38, which features a comparatively smaller 6.52" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the HTC U24 Pro emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Oukitel WP38 that only comes with 60Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the HTC U24 Pro translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

The main camera setup of the HTC U24 Pro surpasses that Oukitel WP38, offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The HTC U24 Pro boasts Triple Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the Oukitel WP38 falls behind with its Dual Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the HTC U24 Pro enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the HTC U24 Pro emerges as a standout against the Oukitel WP38, showcasing an impressive 50 MP camera, while the Oukitel WP38 only comes with 13 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the HTC U24 Pro, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

Delving more into the camera comparison segment, a notable distinction between the HTC U24 Pro and the Oukitel WP38 surfaces with the inclusion of dedicated Telephoto camera features in the former. The HTC U24 Pro stands out by incorporating specialized Telephoto lenses that enable optical zooming, a feature absent in the Oukitel WP38. Optical zoom provides a significant advantage over digital zoom as it involves physical movement of the lens elements, allowing users to magnify subjects without compromising image quality.

This results in sharper, more detailed images, particularly in scenarios where capturing distant subjects is crucial. The absence of dedicated Telephoto capabilities in the Oukitel WP38 means it relies on digital zoom, which often results in a loss of image quality. Thus, the HTC U24 Pro's inclusion of optical zoom through its Telephoto lenses contributes to an enhanced and versatile photography experience.

When discussing front camera features, the HTC U24 Pro and Oukitel WP38 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the HTC U24 Pro and Oukitel WP38. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the HTC U24 Pro outshines the Oukitel WP38, boasting a significantly higher 50 MP front camera compared to the 5 MP front camera on the Oukitel WP38. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the HTC U24 Pro stands out as more powerful than the Oukitel WP38, primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the HTC U24 Pro, a feature absent in the Oukitel WP38. OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the Oukitel WP38 may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The HTC U24 Pro integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.

Battery Endurance

Substantial contrast in battery capacity between the HTC U24 Pro and the Oukitel WP38, with the Oukitel WP38 boasting an impressive 10600 mAh compared to the HTC U24 Pro 10600 mAh, significantly impacts their overall performance. In this scenario, the larger battery in the Oukitel WP38 proves advantageous for several reasons. A bigger battery translates to a higher energy reservoir, allowing the device to sustain prolonged usage without requiring frequent recharges. This is particularly beneficial for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day, ensuring that the Oukitel WP38 can provide a longer lasting and more dependable power supply.

Upon closer examination, the HTC U24 Pro stands out with its Fast Charging 60W feature, a capability absent in the Oukitel WP38. This distinction positions the HTC U24 Pro as a more favorable choice for users who prioritize rapid charging times. The 60W fast charging capability enables the HTC U24 Pro to charge more quickly than the Oukitel WP38, providing users with a convenient and efficient charging experience. In scenarios where time is of the essence, the HTC U24 Pro fast charging feature becomes a notable advantage, making it a preferable option for those seeking expedited charging without compromising on device performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the HTC U24 Pro and Oukitel WP38, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Wireless charging support
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • No fast charging feature supported
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version
  • Average sound & audio quality

Benchmark

Point Result

HTC U24 Pro

Build Quality : 100
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Oukitel WP38

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 85
Sensor : 100
Audio : 85

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

HTC U24 Pro

HTC U24 Pro

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that HTC U24 Pro has better overall performance than Oukitel WP38, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that HTC U24 Pro has a very similar overall performance to Oukitel WP38, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Oukitel WP38

Oukitel WP38

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Oukitel WP38 has better overall performance than HTC U24 Pro, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

HTC U24 Pro

HTC U24 Pro

Amazon
Oukitel WP38

Oukitel WP38

Amazon