Compare Tools :
Date
June 2024
May 2024
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
V2343A
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 14
Android 14
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
Android Stock UI
OriginOS 4.0
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, Tri Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.2, A2DP, LE
5.1, A2DP, LE
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
159.6 x 72 x 8.1 mm
164.4 x 74.8 x 8 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
174 g
190 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Aluminum, IP68 Rated
Plastic
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Black
Black, White, Orange
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Adreno 710
Adreno 710
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
8GB
8GB / 12GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
256GB
128GB / 256GB / 512GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
-
-
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
6.6"
6.78"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
P-OLED
AMOLED
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
1080 x 2400 pixels
1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~402 ppi density, HDR10+, 144Hz
~388 ppi density, 120Hz
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
5000 mAh
6000 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 68W
Fast charging 44W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Dual Setup
Dual Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/1.5", 1.0µm, OIS, PDAF
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, PDAF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Ultrawide) 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 1.12µm, AF
(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
32 MP, f/2.4, 0.7µm, AF
8 MP, f/2.1
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@60fps
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
Stereo Speaker
Stereo Speaker
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
Fingerprint (under display)
Fingerprint (under display)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
Yes
-
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $520
~ $210
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €510
~ €200
Price in Euros (EUR).
Motorola Edge (2024) exhibits superior build quality compared to the Vivo Y200 (China), primarily due to the difference in their construction materials. The Motorola Edge (2024) boasts an aluminum structure body, which generally enhances its overall sturdiness and premium feel. In contrast, the Vivo Y200 (China) is constructed with plastic, a material that, while lightweight, tends to be less robust than aluminum. This distinction in materials contributes to the perception that the Motorola Edge (2024) offers a more durable and higher quality build from a general perspective. The use of aluminum not only imparts a sense of solidity to the device but also suggests a greater resistance to wear and tear compared to the plastic construction of the Vivo Y200 (China).
Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Motorola Edge (2024) and Vivo Y200 (China).
In the domain of visual quality, the Motorola Edge (2024) outshines the Vivo Y200 (China), owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~402, the Motorola Edge (2024) surpasses the Vivo Y200 (China), which boasts ~388 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.
A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Motorola Edge (2024) elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Vivo Y200 (China).
In a general perspective, the Motorola Edge (2024) equipped with an P-OLED display panel, and the Vivo Y200 (China) also featuring an AMOLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.
When comparing the refresh rate time of the Motorola Edge (2024) and the Vivo Y200 (China), the Motorola Edge (2024) emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 144Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Vivo Y200 (China) with 120Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Motorola Edge (2024) with 144Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.
If we compare the Motorola Edge (2024) and Vivo Y200 (China), both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Motorola Edge (2024) and Vivo Y200 (China) on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.
Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Motorola Edge (2024) and Vivo Y200 (China). First, the Motorola Edge (2024) features Wi-Fi 6e, while Vivo Y200 (China) utilizes by Wi-Fi 5 technology. From a technical standpoint, Motorola Edge (2024) holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 6e offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 5. Consequently, the Motorola Edge (2024) ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Vivo Y200 (China).
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Motorola Edge (2024) is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.2, surpassing the Vivo Y200 (China), which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.1. This condition gives the Motorola Edge (2024) a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.2 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.1. Therefore, the Motorola Edge (2024) is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Vivo Y200 (China).
Leveraging NFC technology, the Motorola Edge (2024) emerges as the superior choice over the Vivo Y200 (China) due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the Vivo Y200 (China). The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Vivo Y200 (China) hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Motorola Edge (2024) enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Examining the specification data, Motorola Edge (2024) offers a RAM configuration of 8GB, while the Vivo Y200 (China) boasts a more substantial 8GB / 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the Vivo Y200 (China) holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Referencing the specifications, Motorola Edge (2024) offers internal storage options ranging from 256GB, while Vivo Y200 (China) surpasses this with an impressive 128GB / 256GB / 512GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Vivo Y200 (China), allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Vivo Y200 (China) stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, The Motorola Edge (2024) boasts a formidable combination of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 processor and Adreno 710, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and Adreno 710 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Motorola Edge (2024) to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.
Next, Vivo Y200 (China) stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 processor and the Adreno 710. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 710 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Vivo Y200 (China) excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Vivo Y200 (China) emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.
Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Motorola Edge (2024) comes with less RAM than Vivo Y200 (China). Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Vivo Y200 (China) holds an advantage over the Motorola Edge (2024) due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Vivo Y200 (China), as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.
To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Motorola Edge (2024) is equipped with a 6.6" screen, slightly smaller than the Vivo Y200 (China), which boasts a 6.78" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The Vivo Y200 (China) marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.
Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Motorola Edge (2024) emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 144Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Vivo Y200 (China) that only comes with 120Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Motorola Edge (2024) translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.
When it comes to the main camera features, both the Motorola Edge (2024) and Vivo Y200 (China) share a common ground, utilizing a Dual Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Motorola Edge (2024) and Vivo Y200 (China) provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.
Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Motorola Edge (2024) and Vivo Y200 (China) are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 50 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Motorola Edge (2024) and Vivo Y200 (China) on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.
When discussing front camera features, the Motorola Edge (2024) and Vivo Y200 (China) appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Motorola Edge (2024) and Vivo Y200 (China). While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Motorola Edge (2024) outshines the Vivo Y200 (China), boasting a significantly higher 32 MP front camera compared to the 8 MP front camera on the Vivo Y200 (China). In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.
Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the Motorola Edge (2024) stands out as more powerful than the Vivo Y200 (China), primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Motorola Edge (2024), a feature absent in the Vivo Y200 (China). OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the Vivo Y200 (China) may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The Motorola Edge (2024) integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.
Examining the specifications in battery power, it becomes evident that the Motorola Edge (2024) falls short in comparison to the Vivo Y200 (China). The Motorola Edge (2024) is equipped with a 5000 mAh battery, whereas the Vivo Y200 (China) boasts a more substantial 6000 mAh capacity. This slight but significant difference in battery capacity positions the Vivo Y200 (China) as the preferable choice for those prioritizing extended usage. The higher milliampere-hour rating of the Vivo Y200 (China) translates to a potentially longer lasting power performance, highlighting the importance of even small disparities in battery capacities when evaluating the overall endurance of devices.
In a positive turn of events, both the Motorola Edge (2024) and Vivo Y200 (China) come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Motorola Edge (2024) emerges as the superior choice. While the Vivo Y200 (China) offers a respectable 44W Fast Charging, the Motorola Edge (2024) outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 68W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Motorola Edge (2024) as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Motorola Edge (2024) provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.
Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Motorola Edge (2024) and Vivo Y200 (China), as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Motorola Edge (2024) has better overall performance than Vivo Y200 (China), based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Motorola Edge (2024) has a very similar overall performance to Vivo Y200 (China), based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo Y200 (China) has better overall performance than Motorola Edge (2024), based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.
