Vivo S19 Pro

Vivo S19 Pro

Triple Setup

192 gram

5500 mAh

Android 14

6.78" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB / 16GB RAM

Vivo Y200 GT

Vivo Y200 GT

Dual Setup

194.6 gram

6000 mAh

Android 14

6.78" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Announced

Date

May 2024

May 2024

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

V2362A

V2361GA

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 14

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

OriginOS 4.0

OriginOS 4.0

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.3, A2DP, LE

5.4, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
100

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

164.1 x 75 x 7.6 mm

163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

192 g

194.6 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic + Glass Case, IP64 Rated

Plastic, IP64 Rated

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Gray, Green, Blue

Black, Blue

Official available body color options.

Score

100
100

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Mediatek Dimensity 9200+

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Immortalis-G715 MC11

Adreno 720

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB / 12GB / 16GB

8GB / 12GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB / 512GB

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

95
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.78"

6.78"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

AMOLED

AMOLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1260 x 2800 pixels

1260 x 2800 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~453 ppi density, 120Hz

~453 ppi density, 144Hz

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

5500 mAh

6000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 80W

Fast charging 80W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Dual Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, PDAF

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Tele) 50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, PDAF, 2x optical zoom

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 106˚

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

50 MP, f/2.0, AF

16 MP, f/2.5

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
85

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

Stereo Speaker

Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

Fingerprint (under display)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $430

~ $240

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €420

~ €230

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

The Vivo S19 Pro stands out with its distinctive glass cover, a more powerful feature that absent in the Vivo Y200 GT. This difference in material choice contributes significantly to the overall comparison between the two smartphones. Moreover, in the competitive market, these material are synonymous with a more durable build. Devices incorporating these materials not only exude an upscale aura but also assure users of enhanced resilience, reflecting a dedication to superior craftsmanship and design excellence. This nuanced distinction in materials underscores the divergent approaches to design and quality between the Vivo S19 Pro and the Vivo Y200 GT.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT deliver similar results, both featuring a typical pixel density of ~453 pixels per inch (ppi). The identical ppi values in both devices imply that they share the same level of pixel concentration within a one inch square on their displays. Consequently, their visual quality remains consistent, resulting in a tie between the two in terms of display clarity and sharpness. The matching ppi values suggest that users can expect a comparable visual experience from both the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT, highlighting their similarity in this particular aspect of performance.

In a general perspective, the Vivo S19 Pro equipped with an AMOLED display panel, and the Vivo Y200 GT also featuring an AMOLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.

When considering the refresh rate feature, the Vivo S19 Pro boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo Y200 GT takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 144Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT. First, the Vivo S19 Pro features Wi-Fi 7, while Vivo Y200 GT utilizes by Wi-Fi 6 technology. From a technical standpoint, Vivo S19 Pro holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 7 offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 6. Consequently, the Vivo S19 Pro ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Vivo Y200 GT.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Vivo S19 Pro equipped with Bluetooth 5.3, while the Vivo Y200 GT comes with more latest Bluetooth 5.4 technology. In this scenario, Vivo Y200 GT holds a technological advantage by adopting the more recent Bluetooth technology. Bluetooth 5.4 brings improvements in terms of enhanced services, better connection performance, and increased accuracy in device positioning. Therefore, the integration of Bluetooth 5.4 in the Vivo Y200 GT positions it as the superior choice in Bluetooth technology, offering users a more advanced experience when compared with the Vivo S19 Pro.

Now, Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, Vivo S19 Pro boasts 8GB / 12GB / 16GB of RAM, surpassing Vivo Y200 GT offering 8GB / 12GB RAM. In this scenario, Vivo S19 Pro holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Vivo S19 Pro presents a range of 256GB / 512GB of internal memory storage, while Vivo Y200 GT offers a 128GB / 256GB / 512GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Vivo S19 Pro stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ paired with the Immortalis-G715 MC11. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ provides substantial processing power, while the Immortalis-G715 MC11 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Vivo S19 Pro, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Vivo Y200 GT stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 processor and the Adreno 720. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 720 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Vivo Y200 GT excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Vivo Y200 GT emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like Vivo S19 Pro can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

In the context of gaming experience, a comparison of screen sizes between the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT reveals a notable parity, as both devices boast an identical 6.78" screen size. In this scenario of uniform screen dimensions, it logically follows that the gaming experience on both devices would be equivalent. The equality in screen dimensions implies a consistent visual experience, enabling gamers on both the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT to enjoy games with a uniform field of view and level of immersion. When screen sizes align, as in this case, the potential for a comparable gaming experience is elevated, underscoring the significance of screen dimensions in shaping the overall enjoyment of gaming on mobile devices.

Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the Vivo S19 Pro boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo Y200 GT takes it up a notch with an impressive 144Hz capability. This distinction places the Vivo Y200 GT in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.

Camera Features

The main camera setup of the Vivo S19 Pro surpasses that Vivo Y200 GT, offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The Vivo S19 Pro boasts Triple Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the Vivo Y200 GT falls behind with its Dual Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the Vivo S19 Pro enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.

Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 50 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.

Delving more into the camera comparison segment, a notable distinction between the Vivo S19 Pro and the Vivo Y200 GT surfaces with the inclusion of dedicated Telephoto camera features in the former. The Vivo S19 Pro stands out by incorporating specialized Telephoto lenses that enable optical zooming, a feature absent in the Vivo Y200 GT. Optical zoom provides a significant advantage over digital zoom as it involves physical movement of the lens elements, allowing users to magnify subjects without compromising image quality.

This results in sharper, more detailed images, particularly in scenarios where capturing distant subjects is crucial. The absence of dedicated Telephoto capabilities in the Vivo Y200 GT means it relies on digital zoom, which often results in a loss of image quality. Thus, the Vivo S19 Pro's inclusion of optical zoom through its Telephoto lenses contributes to an enhanced and versatile photography experience.

When discussing front camera features, the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Vivo S19 Pro outshines the Vivo Y200 GT, boasting a significantly higher 50 MP front camera compared to the 16 MP front camera on the Vivo Y200 GT. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the Vivo S19 Pro stands out as more powerful than the Vivo Y200 GT, primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Vivo S19 Pro, a feature absent in the Vivo Y200 GT. OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the Vivo Y200 GT may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The Vivo S19 Pro integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.

Battery Endurance

Examining the specifications in battery power, it becomes evident that the Vivo S19 Pro falls short in comparison to the Vivo Y200 GT. The Vivo S19 Pro is equipped with a 5500 mAh battery, whereas the Vivo Y200 GT boasts a more substantial 6000 mAh capacity. This slight but significant difference in battery capacity positions the Vivo Y200 GT as the preferable choice for those prioritizing extended usage. The higher milliampere-hour rating of the Vivo Y200 GT translates to a potentially longer lasting power performance, highlighting the importance of even small disparities in battery capacities when evaluating the overall endurance of devices.

In the realm of fast charging features, the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT stand shoulder to shoulder, as both devices are equipped with the identical Fast Charging 80W capability. This parity in charging technology ensures that users can expect a similar and efficient charging experience from both devices. With neither device holding a distinct advantage in terms of charging speed, the result is a tie. The shared Fast Charging 80W feature positions the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT on an equal footing, making them both suitable choices for users seeking a reliable and reasonably fast battery charging performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Vivo S19 Pro and Vivo Y200 GT, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

Benchmark

Point Result

Vivo S19 Pro

Build Quality : 100
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 95
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Vivo Y200 GT

Build Quality : 100
Display : 100
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Vivo S19 Pro

Vivo S19 Pro

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo S19 Pro has better overall performance than Vivo Y200 GT, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Vivo S19 Pro has a very similar overall performance to Vivo Y200 GT, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Vivo Y200 GT

Vivo Y200 GT

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo Y200 GT has better overall performance than Vivo S19 Pro, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Vivo S19 Pro

Vivo S19 Pro

Amazon
Vivo Y200 GT

Vivo Y200 GT

Amazon