Oscal Pilot 2

Oscal Pilot 2

Dual Setup

368 gram

8800 mAh

Android 14

6.5" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Vivo Y200 (China)

Vivo Y200 (China)

Dual Setup

190 gram

6000 mAh

Android 14

6.78" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Announced

Date

May 2024

May 2024

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

V2343A

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 14

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Doke OS 4.0

OriginOS 4.0

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

90
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.1, A2DP, LE

5.1, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

179.5 x 82.6 x 17 mm

164.4 x 74.8 x 8 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

368 g

190 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H

Plastic

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, Green, Orange

Black, White, Orange

Official available body color options.

Score

100
75

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Helio G99

Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G57 MC2

Adreno 710

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB

8GB / 12GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.5"

6.78"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

AMOLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2400 pixels

1080 x 2400 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~405 ppi density, 120Hz

~388 ppi density, 120Hz

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

8800 mAh

6000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 45W

Fast charging 44W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Dual Setup

Dual Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, 1/1.57", 1.00μm, OIS, PDAF

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 13 MP, 120˚

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

32 MP

8 MP, f/2.1

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

85
85

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

-

Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

85
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the side)

Fingerprint (under display)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
90

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $210

~ $210

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €200

~ €200

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The Oscal Pilot 2 stands as a rugged phone, purpose built to excel in challenging environments, while the Vivo Y200 (China) represents a standard smartphone design. When it comes to navigating extreme conditions, the Oscal Pilot 2 takes the lead, offering superior build quality tailored for durability. Unlike the standard design of the Vivo Y200 (China), the Oscal Pilot 2 features a reinforced casing constructed from robust materials, ensuring resistance to impacts, drops, and shocks. This enhanced structural integrity equips the Oscal Pilot 2 to endure the rigors of harsh environments with greater resilience than the Vivo Y200 (China).

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China).

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Oscal Pilot 2 outshines the Vivo Y200 (China), owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~405, the Oscal Pilot 2 surpasses the Vivo Y200 (China), which boasts ~388 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Oscal Pilot 2 elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Vivo Y200 (China).

In the realm of display hardware, the Oscal Pilot 2 is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Vivo Y200 (China) boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Vivo Y200 (China) displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Oscal Pilot 2 and the Vivo Y200 (China) align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Oscal Pilot 2 and the Vivo Y200 (China) find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

Comparing Vivo Y200 (China) that which is only features by 4G network connectivity, to the Oscal Pilot 2 that already equipped with 5G capabilities, highlights a significant performance difference, with the latter inherently faster than Vivo Y200 (China). The inclusion of 5G technology in the Oscal Pilot 2 positions it as a more advanced and future proof device, offering users faster data speeds and improved connectivity in the swiftly evolving landscape of network technologies. In contrast, the limited 4G network support in Vivo Y200 (China) may result in comparatively slower data transfer rates. Consequently the Oscal Pilot 2 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing swift and efficient mobile connectivity experiences over the limitations of Vivo Y200 (China).

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China) are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Oscal Pilot 2 nor Vivo Y200 (China) holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China) both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.1 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Oscal Pilot 2 and the Vivo Y200 (China), as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Leveraging NFC technology, the Oscal Pilot 2 emerges as the superior choice over the Vivo Y200 (China) due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the Vivo Y200 (China). The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Vivo Y200 (China) hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Oscal Pilot 2 enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Oscal Pilot 2 offers a RAM configuration of 8GB, while the Vivo Y200 (China) boasts a more substantial 8GB / 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the Vivo Y200 (China) holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referencing the specifications, Oscal Pilot 2 offers internal storage options ranging from 256GB, while Vivo Y200 (China) surpasses this with an impressive 128GB / 256GB / 512GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Vivo Y200 (China), allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Vivo Y200 (China) stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.

Differing from the Oscal Pilot 2, the Vivo Y200 (China) stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Oscal Pilot 2, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Oscal Pilot 2 boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Helio G99 processor and Mali-G57 MC2, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Helio G99 and Mali-G57 MC2 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Oscal Pilot 2 to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Vivo Y200 (China) stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 processor and the Adreno 710. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 710 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Vivo Y200 (China) excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Vivo Y200 (China) emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Oscal Pilot 2 comes with less RAM than Vivo Y200 (China). Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Vivo Y200 (China) holds an advantage over the Oscal Pilot 2 due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Vivo Y200 (China), as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the Oscal Pilot 2 and the Vivo Y200 (China) may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The Oscal Pilot 2, equipped with a 6.5" screen, is notably smaller than the Vivo Y200 (China), which boasts a more generous 6.78" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the Vivo Y200 (China), offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the Vivo Y200 (China), with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China) stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China) ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China), making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China) share a common ground, utilizing a Dual Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China) provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China) are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 50 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China) on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.

When discussing front camera features, the Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China) appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China). While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Oscal Pilot 2 outshines the Vivo Y200 (China), boasting a significantly higher 32 MP front camera compared to the 8 MP front camera on the Vivo Y200 (China). In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the Oscal Pilot 2 stands out as more powerful than the Vivo Y200 (China), primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Oscal Pilot 2, a feature absent in the Vivo Y200 (China). OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the Vivo Y200 (China) may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The Oscal Pilot 2 integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.

Battery Endurance

Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Oscal Pilot 2 and the Vivo Y200 (China) becomes a notable advantage. The Oscal Pilot 2, equipped with an impressive 8800 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the Vivo Y200 (China) 6000 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Oscal Pilot 2 as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Oscal Pilot 2 robust 8800 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.

In a positive turn of events, both the Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China) come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Oscal Pilot 2 emerges as the superior choice. While the Vivo Y200 (China) offers a respectable 44W Fast Charging, the Oscal Pilot 2 outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 45W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Oscal Pilot 2 as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Oscal Pilot 2 provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Oscal Pilot 2 and Vivo Y200 (China), as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version
  • Average sound & audio quality

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Oscal Pilot 2

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 85

Vivo Y200 (China)

Build Quality : 75
Display : 100
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 90
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Oscal Pilot 2

Oscal Pilot 2

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Oscal Pilot 2 has better overall performance than Vivo Y200 (China), based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Oscal Pilot 2 has a very similar overall performance to Vivo Y200 (China), based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Vivo Y200 (China)

Vivo Y200 (China)

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo Y200 (China) has better overall performance than Oscal Pilot 2, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Oscal Pilot 2

Oscal Pilot 2

Amazon
Vivo Y200 (China)

Vivo Y200 (China)

Amazon