Compare Tools :
Date
May 2024
December 2023
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
X6837
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 14
Android 13
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
Doke OS 4.0
XOS 13.5
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G
2G / 3G / 4G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.1, A2DP, LE
5.0, A2DP, LE
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
179.5 x 82.6 x 17 mm
168.6 x 76.6 x 8.2 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
368 g
199 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H
Plastic
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Black, Green, Orange
Black, Gold, Blue, Green
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
MediaTek Helio G99
Mediatek Helio G99
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Mali-G57 MC2
Mail-G57 MC2
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
8GB
8GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
256GB
128GB / 256GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
MicroSDXC
MicroSDXC
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
6.5"
6.78"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
IPS LCD
IPS LCD
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
1080 x 2400 pixels
1080 x 2460 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~405 ppi density, 120Hz
~396 ppi density, 120Hz
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
8800 mAh
5000 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 45W
Fast charging 33W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Dual Setup
Triple Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 50 MP, 1/1.57", 1.00μm, OIS, PDAF
(Main) 108 MP, f/1.75, AF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Ultrawide) 13 MP, 120˚
(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
-
(Depth) 0.08 MP
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
32 MP
32 MP, f/2.2
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
-
3.5mm jack
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
Fingerprint (at the side)
Fingerprint (at the side)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
Yes
Yes
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $210
~ $210
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €200
~ €200
Price in Euros (EUR).
The Oscal Pilot 2 stands as a rugged phone, purpose built to excel in challenging environments, while the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire represents a standard smartphone design. When it comes to navigating extreme conditions, the Oscal Pilot 2 takes the lead, offering superior build quality tailored for durability. Unlike the standard design of the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, the Oscal Pilot 2 features a reinforced casing constructed from robust materials, ensuring resistance to impacts, drops, and shocks. This enhanced structural integrity equips the Oscal Pilot 2 to endure the rigors of harsh environments with greater resilience than the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire.
Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire.
In the domain of visual quality, the Oscal Pilot 2 outshines the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~405, the Oscal Pilot 2 surpasses the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, which boasts ~396 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.
A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Oscal Pilot 2 elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire.
In the realm of display panel technology, the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire.
From the screen refresh rate features, the Oscal Pilot 2 and the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Oscal Pilot 2 and the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.
If we compare the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, both are supported by 4G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 4G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.
Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Oscal Pilot 2 nor Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Oscal Pilot 2 is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.1, surpassing the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.0. This condition gives the Oscal Pilot 2 a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.1 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.0. Therefore, the Oscal Pilot 2 is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire.
Now, Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Considering the specification data, the Oscal Pilot 2 is equipped with 8GB of RAM, while the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire offers a range of 8GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Oscal Pilot 2 presents a range of 256GB of internal memory storage, while Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire offers a 128GB / 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, The Oscal Pilot 2 boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Helio G99 processor and Mali-G57 MC2, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Helio G99 and Mali-G57 MC2 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Oscal Pilot 2 to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.
Next, Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Mediatek Helio G99 processor and Mail-G57 MC2. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Mediatek Helio G99 and Mail-G57 MC2 tandem enables the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.
Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire is likely to be comparable.
Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the Oscal Pilot 2 and the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The Oscal Pilot 2, equipped with a 6.5" screen, is notably smaller than the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, which boasts a more generous 6.78" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.
Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.
Oscal Pilot 2 appears to be in for some tough competition from the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire. While the Oscal Pilot 2 settles for a Dual Setup, the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire takes things up a notch with its impressive Triple Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Oscal Pilot 2 Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.
Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Oscal Pilot 2 introduces a 50 MP camera, while the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire boasts an impressive 108 MP. In this aspect, the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Oscal Pilot 2. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.
This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.
When discussing front camera features, the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
When look on to front camera features of the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 32 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire stand on equal footing with an 32 MP configuration.
Next, when comparing video recording capabilities, the Oscal Pilot 2 stands out as more powerful than the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, primarily due to the inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Oscal Pilot 2, a feature absent in the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire. OIS is a technology that mitigates the impact of hand movements or vibrations while recording videos, ensuring smoother and more stable footage. The absence of OIS in the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire may result in less steady videos, especially in situations where there is hand movement or external vibrations. The Oscal Pilot 2 integration of OIS contributes to a superior video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and stable footage even in challenging conditions, making it a preferred choice for those who prioritize high quality and professional looking videos.
Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Oscal Pilot 2 and the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire becomes a notable advantage. The Oscal Pilot 2, equipped with an impressive 8800 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire 5000 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Oscal Pilot 2 as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Oscal Pilot 2 robust 8800 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.
In a positive turn of events, both the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Oscal Pilot 2 emerges as the superior choice. While the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire offers a respectable 33W Fast Charging, the Oscal Pilot 2 outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 45W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Oscal Pilot 2 as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Oscal Pilot 2 provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.
Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Oscal Pilot 2 and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Oscal Pilot 2 has better overall performance than Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Oscal Pilot 2 has a very similar overall performance to Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire has better overall performance than Oscal Pilot 2, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.
