Poco Pad

Poco Pad

Single Setup

571 gram

10000 mAh

Android 14

12.1" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Teclast M50S

Teclast M50S

Dual Setup

460 gram

( ? )

Android 14

10.1" (Inch)

4GB RAM

Announced

Date

May 2024

June 2024

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

Unknown

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 14

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

HyperOS

Android Stock UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

-

-

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

-

-

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

70
70

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE

5.0, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

280 x 181.8 x 7.5 mm

( ? )

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

571 g

460 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Plastic

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Gray, Blue

Blue

Official available body color options.

Score

75
75

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2

Unisoc T606

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Adreno 710

Mali-G57

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
95

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB

4GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB

128GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

12.1"

10.1"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1600 x 2560 pixels

800 x 1280 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~249 ppi density, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass 3

~149 ppi density

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

10000 mAh

( ? )

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 33W

-

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
85

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Single Setup

Dual Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

8 MP, f/2.0, 1.12μm, AF

(Main) 13 MP, AF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

-

(Depth) 0.08 MP

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

8 MP, f/2.2, 1.12μm

5 MP

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 720p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

80
85

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack, Stereo Speaker

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

-

-

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

-

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

-

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Compass

Accelerometer

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

80
80

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $330

~ $130

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €320

~ €120

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Poco Pad and Teclast M50S share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Poco Pad and Teclast M50S becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Poco Pad and Teclast M50S.

When it comes to screen protection, the Poco Pad stands out as the superior choice. With its pre installed scratch-resistant glass, the Poco Pad offers users a robust defense against daily wear and potential damage. In contrast, the Teclast M50S lacks notable screen protection features. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Poco Pad not only ensures the longevity and durability of the device but also provides users with a reliable shield against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature enhances the overall user experience by minimizing the risk of screen damage and offering a more resilient device.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Poco Pad outshines the Teclast M50S, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~249, the Poco Pad surpasses the Teclast M50S, which boasts ~149 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Poco Pad elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Teclast M50S.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Poco Pad and Teclast M50S share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Poco Pad and Teclast M50S.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the Poco Pad and the Teclast M50S, the Poco Pad emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Teclast M50S with 60Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Poco Pad with 120Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

Sharing a common characteristic, Poco Pad and Teclast M50S both lack support for mobile SIM network features, resulting in a tie in this aspect of their performance. The absence of SIM network support aligns the two devices, eliminating a differentiating factor in their comparison. Users seeking a device without reliance on mobile SIM network features may find both Poco Pad and Teclast M50S equally suitable for their needs, as this shared limitation results in a comparable user experience in this specific regard.

Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Poco Pad and Teclast M50S. First, the Poco Pad features Wi-Fi 6, while Teclast M50S utilizes by Wi-Fi 5 technology. From a technical standpoint, Poco Pad holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 6 offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 5. Consequently, the Poco Pad ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Teclast M50S.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Poco Pad is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.2, surpassing the Teclast M50S, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.0. This condition gives the Poco Pad a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.2 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.0. Therefore, the Poco Pad is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Teclast M50S.

Unfortunately, both the Poco Pad and Teclast M50S lack NFC features, resulting in a tie between them. The absence of NFC constrains these devices in terms of modern connectivity and functionality. NFC serves as a wireless technology that enables seamless data exchange between devices in close proximity, offering diverse applications such as contactless payments, swift file sharing, and simplified pairing with other compatible devices. Consequently, users of Poco Pad and Teclast M50S may encounter limitations in fully exploiting the potential for hassle free connectivity.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, Poco Pad boasts 8GB of RAM, surpassing Teclast M50S offering 4GB RAM. In this scenario, Poco Pad holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Poco Pad emerges as the superior choice over Teclast M50S, evident in its internal memory configuration of 256GB, surpassing the 128GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Poco Pad higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Differing from the Poco Pad, the Teclast M50S stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Poco Pad, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Poco Pad boasts a formidable combination of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 processor and Adreno 710, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and Adreno 710 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Poco Pad to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Teclast M50S is equipped with entry-level hardware, featuring the Unisoc T606 processor and Mali-G57. While not tailored for hardcore gaming enthusiasts, this device still holds its ground for casual gaming experiences. The combination of the Unisoc T606 and Mali-G57 allows the Teclast M50S to handle less graphics intensive games smoothly and efficiently. However, its technical specifications suggest that it might struggle with the demands of high-end, resource intensive gaming. Nevertheless, for users looking for a budget friendly smartphone that can handle everyday tasks and provide a decent gaming experience at lower to mid-level graphic settings, the Teclast M50S remains a viable and cost effective option.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between Poco Pad and Teclast M50S suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like Poco Pad can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

For an optimal gaming experience, the Poco Pad distinguishes itself with its notably larger 12.1" screen, surpassing the Teclast M50S, which features a comparatively smaller 10.1" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Poco Pad emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 120Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Teclast M50S that only comes with 60Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Poco Pad translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

Poco Pad appears to be in for some tough competition from the Teclast M50S. While the Poco Pad settles for a Single Setup, the Teclast M50S takes things up a notch with its impressive Dual Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Teclast M50S promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Poco Pad Single Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Teclast M50S in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Poco Pad introduces a 8 MP camera, while the Teclast M50S boasts an impressive 13 MP. In this aspect, the Teclast M50S holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Poco Pad. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Teclast M50S, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Poco Pad and Teclast M50S appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Poco Pad and Teclast M50S. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Poco Pad outshines the Teclast M50S, boasting a significantly higher 8 MP front camera compared to the 5 MP front camera on the Teclast M50S. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Sadly, the both of Poco Pad and Teclast M50S are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Poco Pad and Teclast M50S may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Assessment of battery capacity performance between the Poco Pad and Teclast M50S is currently impeded due to a shortage of data. The absence of comprehensive information prevents an accurate comparison at this point. Patience is advised as we await the completion of data collection, which is crucial for a thorough evaluation of the two devices. Only with a comprehensive dataset can a final and informed judgment be made regarding the battery capabilities of the Poco Pad and Teclast M50S, allowing consumers to make well-informed decisions based on reliable information.

Upon closer examination, the Poco Pad stands out with its Fast Charging 33W feature, a capability absent in the Teclast M50S. This distinction positions the Poco Pad as a more favorable choice for users who prioritize rapid charging times. The 33W fast charging capability enables the Poco Pad to charge more quickly than the Teclast M50S, providing users with a convenient and efficient charging experience. In scenarios where time is of the essence, the Poco Pad fast charging feature becomes a notable advantage, making it a preferable option for those seeking expedited charging without compromising on device performance.

Security Features

Unfortunately, both the Poco Pad and Teclast M50S lack dedicated biometric sensors for enhanced security. The overall tie in their performance highlights a shared limitation. The absence of a distinct advantage in terms of biometric security features suggests that, in the contemporary era where security is paramount, the lack of advancements in this aspect may be considered a drawback. In a landscape where technological innovations continually shape user experiences, the absence of distinctiveness in dedicated security sensors on both devices might be seen as a missed opportunity to provide users with a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Mobile network not available
  • No SIM Card function supported

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • No fast charging feature supported
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Mobile network not available
  • No SIM Card function supported
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Poco Pad

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 80
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 70
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 80
Audio : 100

Teclast M50S

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 95
Memory : 100
Network : 70
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 85
Sensor : 80
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Poco Pad

Poco Pad

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Poco Pad has better overall performance than Teclast M50S, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Poco Pad has a very similar overall performance to Teclast M50S, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Teclast M50S

Teclast M50S

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Teclast M50S has better overall performance than Poco Pad, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Poco Pad

Poco Pad

Amazon
Teclast M50S

Teclast M50S

Amazon