Compare Tools :
Date
May 2024
May 2024
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
V2353DA
Unknown
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 14
Android 14
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
OriginOS 4.0
One UI 6.1
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.1, A2DP, LE
5.3, A2DP, LE
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
165.7 x 76 x 8 mm
162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
199 g
222 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Plastic
Plastic
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Blue, Green
Gray, Blue
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Exynos 1380
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Adreno 710
Mali-G68 MP5
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
8GB / 12GB
8GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
128GB / 256GB / 512GB
256GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
-
MicroSDXC
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
6.72"
6.6"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
IPS LCD
Super AMOLED
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
1080 x 2408 pixels
1080 x 2340 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~393 ppi density, 120Hz
~390 ppi density, 120Hz
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
6000 mAh
6000 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 44W
Fast charging 25W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Dual Setup
Triple Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, PDAF
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, OIS, PDAF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4
(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
-
(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
8 MP, f/2.1
13 MP, f/2.2
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
Stereo Speaker
Stereo Speaker
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
Fingerprint (at the side)
Fingerprint (at the side)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
-
Yes
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $150
~ $470
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €140
~ €460
Price in Euros (EUR).
Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.
Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G.
In the domain of visual quality, the Vivo Y200t outshines the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~393, the Vivo Y200t surpasses the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G, which boasts ~390 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.
A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Vivo Y200t elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G.
In the realm of display hardware, the Vivo Y200t is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G boasts a brilliant Super AMOLED display. The advantages of Super AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Samsung Galaxy M35 5G displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.
From the screen refresh rate features, the Vivo Y200t and the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Vivo Y200t and the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.
If we compare the Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.
Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Vivo Y200t that equipped with Wi-Fi 5, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 6 technology. This distinction positions the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 6 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 5. So, the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G with Wi-Fi 6 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Vivo Y200t, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Vivo Y200t equipped with Bluetooth 5.1, while the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G comes with more latest Bluetooth 5.3 technology. In this scenario, Samsung Galaxy M35 5G holds a technological advantage by adopting the more recent Bluetooth technology. Bluetooth 5.3 brings improvements in terms of enhanced services, better connection performance, and increased accuracy in device positioning. Therefore, the integration of Bluetooth 5.3 in the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G positions it as the superior choice in Bluetooth technology, offering users a more advanced experience when compared with the Vivo Y200t.
From the NFC technology perspective, Vivo Y200t lacks the NFC feature, while the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G comes equipped with it, making the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G notably superior. The NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless technology facilitating smooth data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Vivo Y200t restricts its capabilities for convenient applications like quick file sharing, contactless payments, and seamless connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. Conversely, the inclusion of NFC in the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G enhances its versatility, providing users with an extended range of applications.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Considering the specification data, Vivo Y200t boasts 8GB / 12GB of RAM, surpassing Samsung Galaxy M35 5G offering 8GB RAM. In this scenario, Vivo Y200t holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Referring to the specification data, Vivo Y200t emerges as the superior choice over Samsung Galaxy M35 5G, evident in its internal memory configuration of 128GB / 256GB / 512GB, surpassing the 256GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Vivo Y200t higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.
Highlighting a notable distinction, the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G introduces an interesting feature by incorporating external memory expansion, a capability notably absent in the Vivo Y200t. This feature proves advantageous for users seeking enhanced storage flexibility. With external memory expansion, Samsung Galaxy M35 5G users can easily amplify their device storage by adding a compatible external memory card. This becomes particularly beneficial for individuals who require additional space for storing diverse data, be it large files, multimedia content, or extra applications. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to tailor and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, offering a practical solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, Vivo Y200t stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 paired with the Adreno 710. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 710 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Vivo Y200t, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.
Next, Samsung Galaxy M35 5G features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Exynos 1380 processor and Mali-G68 MP5. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Exynos 1380 and Mali-G68 MP5 tandem enables the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.
Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like Vivo Y200t can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.
When it comes to optimizing the gaming experience on mobile phones, screen size plays a crucial role in determining visual clarity and immersion. In the context of the Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G, the Vivo Y200t boasts a slightly larger 6.72" screen compared to the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G is 6.6" display. This slight difference in size can contribute to a more immersive gaming experience for users. A larger screen provides a more expansive field of view, allowing gamers to perceive in game details with greater clarity and precision. This enhanced visibility becomes particularly important in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential. Additionally, a larger screen can make gaming sessions more enjoyable by offering a more engaging and immersive visual experience.
Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.
Vivo Y200t appears to be in for some tough competition from the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G. While the Vivo Y200t settles for a Dual Setup, the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G takes things up a notch with its impressive Triple Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Vivo Y200t Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.
Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 50 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.
When discussing front camera features, the Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G holds a distinct advantage over the Vivo Y200t. The Samsung Galaxy M35 5G boasts a larger 13 MP front camera, while the Vivo Y200t features a 8 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.
Next, In the realm of video recording, a noteworthy distinction arises between the Vivo Y200t and the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Vivo Y200t is a significant limitation when compared to the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G, which incorporates OIS technology. OIS plays a crucial role in reducing unwanted motion and vibrations during video recording, resulting in smoother and more professionally captured footage. In practical terms, this means that the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G can deliver more stable and visually appealing videos, especially in situations where there might be hand movements or external disturbances. The inclusion of OIS in the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G contributes to a superior video recording experience, making it a more desirable choice for users who prioritize high quality and steady video footage over time.
After evaluating the battery power of the Vivo Y200t and the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G, it becomes evident that both devices operate on an equal footing, each equipped with a 6000 mAh battery. This parity in battery capacity implies that, in terms of power endurance, the Vivo Y200t and the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G yield comparable results. Users can expect similar levels of battery life from both devices, making it a draw in this aspect of comparison. The matching 6000 mAh batteries ensure that users can rely on consistent and reasonably lasting performance from either the Vivo Y200t or the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G without a significant advantage for either device in the realm of battery power.
In a positive turn of events, both the Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Vivo Y200t emerges as the superior choice. While the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G offers a respectable 25W Fast Charging, the Vivo Y200t outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 44W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Vivo Y200t as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Vivo Y200t provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.
Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Vivo Y200t and Samsung Galaxy M35 5G, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo Y200t has better overall performance than Samsung Galaxy M35 5G, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Vivo Y200t has a very similar overall performance to Samsung Galaxy M35 5G, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Samsung Galaxy M35 5G has better overall performance than Vivo Y200t, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.
