Vivo Y200 GT

Vivo Y200 GT

Dual Setup

194.6 gram

6000 mAh

Android 14

6.78" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Teclast M50S

Teclast M50S

Dual Setup

460 gram

( ? )

Android 14

10.1" (Inch)




May 2024

June 2024

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail




Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.



Android 14

Android 14

Operating system type (OS) and version number.


OriginOS 4.0

Android Stock UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.



2G / 3G / 4G / 5G


Available mobile network support options.


Single / Dual Nano SIM


Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.



Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.



Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.


5.4, A2DP, LE

5.0, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.


USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.



Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design


163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm

( ? )

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).


194.6 g

460 g

Weight of the device in grams.


Plastic, IP64 Rated


Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, Blue


Official available body color options.



The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.



Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3

Unisoc T606

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.


Adreno 720


Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.



The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.



8GB / 12GB


Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.


128GB / 256GB / 512GB


Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.




Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.



Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display




Screen size in inches.




Type of display panel hardware.


1260 x 2800 pixels

800 x 1280 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.


~453 ppi density, 144Hz

~149 ppi density

Any extra display and screen features if available.



To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.





Type of battery model.


6000 mAh

( ? )

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).


Fast charging 80W


Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.



A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.



Dual Setup

Dual Setup

Total number of rear cameras.


(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF

(Main) 13 MP, AF

Details of the main camera unit.


(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Depth) 0.08 MP

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.




Details of the third camera unit, if available.




Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.


Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.


16 MP, f/2.5

5 MP

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.




Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.


Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 720p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.



The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound




Primary sound system type.


Stereo Speaker

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.



For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.



Fingerprint (under display)


Biometric security hardware model, if available.




Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.




Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.


Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass


Available sensor hardware type and function.



Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.



~ $240

~ $130

Price in US dollars (USD).


~ €230

~ €120

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown


Vivo Y200 GT and Teclast M50S share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Vivo Y200 GT and Teclast M50S becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Vivo Y200 GT and Teclast M50S.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Vivo Y200 GT outshines the Teclast M50S, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~453, the Vivo Y200 GT surpasses the Teclast M50S, which boasts ~149 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Vivo Y200 GT elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Teclast M50S.

In terms of display hardware, the Vivo Y200 GT stands out with its AMOLED technology display, presenting a significant advantage over the Teclast M50S, which incorporates an IPS LCD screen. The Vivo Y200 GT with AMOLED technology excels in providing superior visual performance, marked by vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and higher contrast ratios. The architecture of AMOLED displays involves the emission of light individually from each pixel, facilitating precise control and achieving true blacks by completely turning off pixels. This characteristic contributes to a more immersive viewing experience characterized by enhanced color accuracy and sharpness.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the Vivo Y200 GT and the Teclast M50S, the Vivo Y200 GT emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 144Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Teclast M50S with 60Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Vivo Y200 GT with 144Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

Comparing the Vivo Y200 GT that comes with 5G network capabilities, to the Teclast M50S which lacks mobile SIM network support, underscores a clear advantage for the Vivo Y200 GT. In circumstances where users prioritize the use of mobile SIM features on their devices, the Vivo Y200 GT stands out as the preferable choice. The absence of mobile SIM network support in the Teclast M50S may limit its functionality for users seeking seamless connectivity through mobile networks. Consequently the Vivo Y200 GT emerges as the superior option in this particular aspect of comparison.

Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Vivo Y200 GT and Teclast M50S. First, the Vivo Y200 GT features Wi-Fi 6, while Teclast M50S utilizes by Wi-Fi 5 technology. From a technical standpoint, Vivo Y200 GT holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 6 offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 5. Consequently, the Vivo Y200 GT ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Teclast M50S.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Vivo Y200 GT is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.4, surpassing the Teclast M50S, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.0. This condition gives the Vivo Y200 GT a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.4 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.0. Therefore, the Vivo Y200 GT is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Teclast M50S.

Leveraging NFC technology, the Vivo Y200 GT emerges as the superior choice over the Teclast M50S due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the Teclast M50S. The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Teclast M50S hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Vivo Y200 GT enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, Vivo Y200 GT boasts 8GB / 12GB of RAM, surpassing Teclast M50S offering 4GB RAM. In this scenario, Vivo Y200 GT holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Vivo Y200 GT emerges as the superior choice over Teclast M50S, evident in its internal memory configuration of 128GB / 256GB / 512GB, surpassing the 128GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Vivo Y200 GT higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Differing from the Vivo Y200 GT, the Teclast M50S stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Vivo Y200 GT, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Vivo Y200 GT stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 paired with the Adreno 720. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 720 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Vivo Y200 GT, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Teclast M50S is equipped with entry-level hardware, featuring the Unisoc T606 processor and Mali-G57. While not tailored for hardcore gaming enthusiasts, this device still holds its ground for casual gaming experiences. The combination of the Unisoc T606 and Mali-G57 allows the Teclast M50S to handle less graphics intensive games smoothly and efficiently. However, its technical specifications suggest that it might struggle with the demands of high-end, resource intensive gaming. Nevertheless, for users looking for a budget friendly smartphone that can handle everyday tasks and provide a decent gaming experience at lower to mid-level graphic settings, the Teclast M50S remains a viable and cost effective option.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between Vivo Y200 GT and Teclast M50S suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like Vivo Y200 GT can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the Vivo Y200 GT and the Teclast M50S may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The Vivo Y200 GT, equipped with a 6.78" screen, is notably smaller than the Teclast M50S, which boasts a more generous 10.1" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the Teclast M50S, offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the Teclast M50S, with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Vivo Y200 GT emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 144Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Teclast M50S that only comes with 60Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Vivo Y200 GT translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Vivo Y200 GT and Teclast M50S share a common ground, utilizing a Dual Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Vivo Y200 GT and Teclast M50S provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Vivo Y200 GT emerges as a standout against the Teclast M50S, showcasing an impressive 50 MP camera, while the Teclast M50S only comes with 13 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Vivo Y200 GT, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Vivo Y200 GT and Teclast M50S appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Vivo Y200 GT and Teclast M50S. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Vivo Y200 GT outshines the Teclast M50S, boasting a significantly higher 16 MP front camera compared to the 5 MP front camera on the Teclast M50S. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Sadly, the both of Vivo Y200 GT and Teclast M50S are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Vivo Y200 GT and Teclast M50S may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Assessment of battery capacity performance between the Vivo Y200 GT and Teclast M50S is currently impeded due to a shortage of data. The absence of comprehensive information prevents an accurate comparison at this point. Patience is advised as we await the completion of data collection, which is crucial for a thorough evaluation of the two devices. Only with a comprehensive dataset can a final and informed judgment be made regarding the battery capabilities of the Vivo Y200 GT and Teclast M50S, allowing consumers to make well-informed decisions based on reliable information.

Upon closer examination, the Vivo Y200 GT stands out with its Fast Charging 80W feature, a capability absent in the Teclast M50S. This distinction positions the Vivo Y200 GT as a more favorable choice for users who prioritize rapid charging times. The 80W fast charging capability enables the Vivo Y200 GT to charge more quickly than the Teclast M50S, providing users with a convenient and efficient charging experience. In scenarios where time is of the essence, the Vivo Y200 GT fast charging feature becomes a notable advantage, making it a preferable option for those seeking expedited charging without compromising on device performance.

Security Features

At the security features, Vivo Y200 GT demonstrates superiority over Teclast M50S, primarily owing to its incorporation of a dedicated biometric sensor designed to enhance the device security. This contrasts sharply with Teclast M50S, which lacks a dedicated biometric sensor, resulting in all security measures remaining at a standard level. The absence of a specialized security sensor on Teclast M50S places it at a disadvantage, as Vivo Y200 GT provides users with an elevated and secure means of device access and authentication through its dedicated biometric feature.


Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card


Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • No fast charging feature supported
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Mobile network not available
  • No SIM Card function supported
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version


Point Result

Vivo Y200 GT

Build Quality : 100
Display : 100
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Teclast M50S

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 95
Memory : 100
Network : 70
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 85
Sensor : 80
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Vivo Y200 GT

Vivo Y200 GT

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo Y200 GT has better overall performance than Teclast M50S, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Vivo Y200 GT has a very similar overall performance to Teclast M50S, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Teclast M50S

Teclast M50S

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Teclast M50S has better overall performance than Vivo Y200 GT, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Vivo Y200 GT

Vivo Y200 GT

Teclast M50S

Teclast M50S