Vivo Y200 GT

Vivo Y200 GT

Dual Setup

194.6 gram

6000 mAh

Android 14

6.78" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire

Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire

Triple Setup

199 gram

5000 mAh

Android 13

6.78" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Announced

Date

May 2024

December 2023

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

V2361GA

X6837

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 13

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

OriginOS 4.0

XOS 13.5

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Single / Dual Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.4, A2DP, LE

5.0, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm

168.6 x 76.6 x 8.2 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

194.6 g

199 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic, IP64 Rated

Plastic

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, Blue

Black, Gold, Blue, Green

Official available body color options.

Score

100
75

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3

Mediatek Helio G99

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Adreno 720

Mail-G57 MC2

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB / 12GB

8GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

128GB / 256GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

-

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.78"

6.78"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

AMOLED

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1260 x 2800 pixels

1080 x 2460 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~453 ppi density, 144Hz

~396 ppi density, 120Hz

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

6000 mAh

5000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 80W

Fast charging 33W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Dual Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF

(Main) 108 MP, f/1.75, AF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Depth) 0.08 MP

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

16 MP, f/2.5

32 MP, f/2.2

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

85
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

Stereo Speaker

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

Fingerprint (at the side)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $240

~ $210

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €230

~ €200

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Vivo Y200 GT outshines the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~453, the Vivo Y200 GT surpasses the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, which boasts ~396 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Vivo Y200 GT elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire.

In terms of display hardware, the Vivo Y200 GT stands out with its AMOLED technology display, presenting a significant advantage over the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, which incorporates an IPS LCD screen. The Vivo Y200 GT with AMOLED technology excels in providing superior visual performance, marked by vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and higher contrast ratios. The architecture of AMOLED displays involves the emission of light individually from each pixel, facilitating precise control and achieving true blacks by completely turning off pixels. This characteristic contributes to a more immersive viewing experience characterized by enhanced color accuracy and sharpness.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the Vivo Y200 GT and the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, the Vivo Y200 GT emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 144Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire with 120Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Vivo Y200 GT with 144Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

Comparing Vivo Y200 GT equipped with 5G features to Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire with only 4G capabilities highlights a distinct advantage for Vivo Y200 GT. The incorporation of 5G technology positions Vivo Y200 GT as a more future proof device, offering faster data speeds and improved connectivity. In contrast, the limited 4G capabilities of Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire may result in a comparatively slower and less efficient network experience. Consequently in this context, Vivo Y200 GT emerges as the superior option, providing a more modern and technologically advanced mobile experience compared to Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire.

Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire. First, the Vivo Y200 GT features Wi-Fi 6, while Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire utilizes by Wi-Fi 5 technology. From a technical standpoint, Vivo Y200 GT holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 6 offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 5. Consequently, the Vivo Y200 GT ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Vivo Y200 GT is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.4, surpassing the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.0. This condition gives the Vivo Y200 GT a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.4 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.0. Therefore, the Vivo Y200 GT is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire.

Now, Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, Vivo Y200 GT boasts 8GB / 12GB of RAM, surpassing Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire offering 8GB RAM. In this scenario, Vivo Y200 GT holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Vivo Y200 GT emerges as the superior choice over Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, evident in its internal memory configuration of 128GB / 256GB / 512GB, surpassing the 128GB / 256GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Vivo Y200 GT higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Vivo Y200 GT stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 paired with the Adreno 720. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 720 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Vivo Y200 GT, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Mediatek Helio G99 processor and Mail-G57 MC2. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Mediatek Helio G99 and Mail-G57 MC2 tandem enables the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like Vivo Y200 GT can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

In the context of gaming experience, a comparison of screen sizes between the Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire reveals a notable parity, as both devices boast an identical 6.78" screen size. In this scenario of uniform screen dimensions, it logically follows that the gaming experience on both devices would be equivalent. The equality in screen dimensions implies a consistent visual experience, enabling gamers on both the Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire to enjoy games with a uniform field of view and level of immersion. When screen sizes align, as in this case, the potential for a comparable gaming experience is elevated, underscoring the significance of screen dimensions in shaping the overall enjoyment of gaming on mobile devices.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Vivo Y200 GT emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 144Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire that only comes with 120Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Vivo Y200 GT translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

Vivo Y200 GT appears to be in for some tough competition from the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire. While the Vivo Y200 GT settles for a Dual Setup, the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire takes things up a notch with its impressive Triple Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Vivo Y200 GT Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Vivo Y200 GT introduces a 50 MP camera, while the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire boasts an impressive 108 MP. In this aspect, the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Vivo Y200 GT. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire holds a distinct advantage over the Vivo Y200 GT. The Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire boasts a larger 32 MP front camera, while the Vivo Y200 GT features a 16 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Sadly, the both of Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Vivo Y200 GT surpasses the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire. The Vivo Y200 GT boasts a substantial 6000 mAh battery, while the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire falls slightly behind with a 5000 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Vivo Y200 GT as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Vivo Y200 GT is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire.

In a positive turn of events, both the Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Vivo Y200 GT emerges as the superior choice. While the Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire offers a respectable 33W Fast Charging, the Vivo Y200 GT outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 80W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Vivo Y200 GT as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Vivo Y200 GT provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Vivo Y200 GT and Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Low quality body material used
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Vivo Y200 GT

Build Quality : 100
Display : 100
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Vivo Y200 GT

Vivo Y200 GT

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo Y200 GT has better overall performance than Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Vivo Y200 GT has a very similar overall performance to Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire

Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire has better overall performance than Vivo Y200 GT, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Vivo Y200 GT

Vivo Y200 GT

Amazon
Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire

Infinix Hot 40 Pro Free Fire

Amazon