Compare Tools :
Date
May 2024
May 2024
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
V2362A
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 13
Android 14
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
Android Stock UI
OriginOS 4.0
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
4.2, A2DP, LE
5.3, A2DP, LE
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
( ? )
164.1 x 75 x 7.6 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
( ? )
192 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H
Plastic + Glass Case, IP64 Rated
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Black
Gray, Green, Blue
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
MediaTek MT8788
Mediatek Dimensity 9200+
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Mali-G72 MP3
Immortalis-G715 MC11
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
6GB
8GB / 12GB / 16GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
256GB
256GB / 512GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
MicroSDXC
MicroSDXC
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
6.52"
6.78"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
IPS LCD
AMOLED
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
720 x 1600 pixels
1260 x 2800 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~269 ppi density
~453 ppi density, 120Hz
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
10600 mAh
5500 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
-
Fast charging 80W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Dual Setup
Triple Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 13 MP, AF
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, PDAF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4
(Tele) 50 MP, f/1.9, OIS, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
-
(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 106˚
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
5 MP
50 MP, f/2.0, AF
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 720p@30fps
Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
-
Stereo Speaker
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
Fingerprint (at the back)
Fingerprint (under display)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
Yes
Yes
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $120
~ $430
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €110
~ €420
Price in Euros (EUR).
The Oukitel WP38 stands as a rugged phone, purpose built to excel in challenging environments, while the Vivo S19 Pro represents a standard smartphone design. When it comes to navigating extreme conditions, the Oukitel WP38 takes the lead, offering superior build quality tailored for durability. Unlike the standard design of the Vivo S19 Pro, the Oukitel WP38 features a reinforced casing constructed from robust materials, ensuring resistance to impacts, drops, and shocks. This enhanced structural integrity equips the Oukitel WP38 to endure the rigors of harsh environments with greater resilience than the Vivo S19 Pro.
While the Oukitel WP38 features with a standard cover, the Vivo S19 Pro distinguishes itself by elevating its design with a more luxurious glass cover, adding an extra layer of sophistication and durability. The incorporation of a glass cover sets the Vivo S19 Pro apart, not only in terms of aesthetics but also in the tactile and visual experience it offers. Beyond the surface level appeal, the glass cover enhances the device durability, providing robust yet stylish protection. This distinction makes the Vivo S19 Pro more intriguing than the Oukitel WP38, as it caters to individuals seeking a combination of elegance and resilience in their device.
In terms of visual quality performance, the Oukitel WP38 with its ~269 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Vivo S19 Pro, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~453. The Vivo S19 Pro gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.
This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Vivo S19 Pro, its elevated ppi of ~453 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Oukitel WP38.
In the realm of display hardware, the Oukitel WP38 is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Vivo S19 Pro boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Vivo S19 Pro displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.
When considering the refresh rate feature, the Oukitel WP38 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo S19 Pro takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 120Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.
Comparing Vivo S19 Pro that which is only features by 4G network connectivity, to the Oukitel WP38 that already equipped with 5G capabilities, highlights a significant performance difference, with the latter inherently faster than Vivo S19 Pro. The inclusion of 5G technology in the Oukitel WP38 positions it as a more advanced and future proof device, offering users faster data speeds and improved connectivity in the swiftly evolving landscape of network technologies. In contrast, the limited 4G network support in Vivo S19 Pro may result in comparatively slower data transfer rates. Consequently the Oukitel WP38 emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing swift and efficient mobile connectivity experiences over the limitations of Vivo S19 Pro.
Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Oukitel WP38 that equipped with Wi-Fi 5, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Vivo S19 Pro which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 7 technology. This distinction positions the Vivo S19 Pro at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 7 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 5. So, the Vivo S19 Pro with Wi-Fi 7 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Oukitel WP38, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Oukitel WP38 equipped with Bluetooth 4.2, while the Vivo S19 Pro comes with more latest Bluetooth 5.3 technology. In this scenario, Vivo S19 Pro holds a technological advantage by adopting the more recent Bluetooth technology. Bluetooth 5.3 brings improvements in terms of enhanced services, better connection performance, and increased accuracy in device positioning. Therefore, the integration of Bluetooth 5.3 in the Vivo S19 Pro positions it as the superior choice in Bluetooth technology, offering users a more advanced experience when compared with the Oukitel WP38.
Now, Oukitel WP38 and Vivo S19 Pro stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Examining the specification data, Oukitel WP38 offers a RAM configuration of 6GB, while the Vivo S19 Pro boasts a more substantial 8GB / 12GB / 16GB RAM range. Clearly, the Vivo S19 Pro holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Referencing the specifications, Oukitel WP38 offers internal storage options ranging from 256GB, while Vivo S19 Pro surpasses this with an impressive 256GB / 512GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Vivo S19 Pro, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Vivo S19 Pro stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, The Oukitel WP38 boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek MT8788 processor and Mali-G72 MP3, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek MT8788 and Mali-G72 MP3 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Oukitel WP38 to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.
Next, Vivo S19 Pro stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ processor and the Immortalis-G715 MC11. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ provides robust processing capabilities, while the Immortalis-G715 MC11 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Vivo S19 Pro excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Vivo S19 Pro emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.
Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Oukitel WP38 comes with less RAM than Vivo S19 Pro. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Vivo S19 Pro holds an advantage over the Oukitel WP38 due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Vivo S19 Pro, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.
Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the Oukitel WP38 and the Vivo S19 Pro may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The Oukitel WP38, equipped with a 6.52" screen, is notably smaller than the Vivo S19 Pro, which boasts a more generous 6.78" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the Vivo S19 Pro, offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the Vivo S19 Pro, with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.
Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the Oukitel WP38 boasts a 60Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo S19 Pro takes it up a notch with an impressive 120Hz capability. This distinction places the Vivo S19 Pro in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.
Oukitel WP38 appears to be in for some tough competition from the Vivo S19 Pro. While the Oukitel WP38 settles for a Dual Setup, the Vivo S19 Pro takes things up a notch with its impressive Triple Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Vivo S19 Pro promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Oukitel WP38 Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Vivo S19 Pro in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.
Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Oukitel WP38 introduces a 13 MP camera, while the Vivo S19 Pro boasts an impressive 50 MP. In this aspect, the Vivo S19 Pro holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Oukitel WP38. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.
This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Vivo S19 Pro, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.
Delving further into the intricacies of the camera features on both smartphones, a distinctive characteristic emerges in the Vivo S19 Pro, setting it apart from the Oukitel WP38, that is inclusion of dedicated lenses for Telephoto functionality. This noteworthy feature, absent in the Oukitel WP38, grants the Vivo S19 Pro the capability to employ optical zoom, ensuring sharper and more detailed results when capturing distant subjects. The absence of dedicated Telephoto lenses in the Oukitel WP38 implies a reliance on alternative methods, potentially utilizing digital zoom, which often compromises image quality. The Vivo S19 Pro incorporation of optical zoom through its dedicated Telephoto lenses signifies a strategic enhancement in the realm of smartphone photography, offering users the advantage of capturing distant scenes with precision and clarity.
When discussing front camera features, the Oukitel WP38 and Vivo S19 Pro appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Oukitel WP38 and Vivo S19 Pro. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Vivo S19 Pro holds a distinct advantage over the Oukitel WP38. The Vivo S19 Pro boasts a larger 50 MP front camera, while the Oukitel WP38 features a 5 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Vivo S19 Pro provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.
Next, In the realm of video recording, a noteworthy distinction arises between the Oukitel WP38 and the Vivo S19 Pro. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Oukitel WP38 is a significant limitation when compared to the Vivo S19 Pro, which incorporates OIS technology. OIS plays a crucial role in reducing unwanted motion and vibrations during video recording, resulting in smoother and more professionally captured footage. In practical terms, this means that the Vivo S19 Pro can deliver more stable and visually appealing videos, especially in situations where there might be hand movements or external disturbances. The inclusion of OIS in the Vivo S19 Pro contributes to a superior video recording experience, making it a more desirable choice for users who prioritize high quality and steady video footage over time.
Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Oukitel WP38 and the Vivo S19 Pro becomes a notable advantage. The Oukitel WP38, equipped with an impressive 10600 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the Vivo S19 Pro 5500 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Oukitel WP38 as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Oukitel WP38 robust 10600 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.
Then, if we comparing the Oukitel WP38 and Vivo S19 Pro, it becomes evident that the Vivo S19 Pro holds a significant advantage. The Vivo S19 Pro is equipped with Fast Charging 80W features, a noteworthy capability absent in the Oukitel WP38. This distinction gives the Vivo S19 Pro a clear edge in terms of charging efficiency. With its faster charging technology, the Vivo S19 Pro ensures a more rapid replenishment of the battery compared to the Oukitel WP38. In scenarios where quick charging is a priority, the Vivo S19 Pro stands out as a superior choice, offering users a more expedited charging experience without compromising on performance.
Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Oukitel WP38 and Vivo S19 Pro, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Oukitel WP38 has better overall performance than Vivo S19 Pro, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Oukitel WP38 has a very similar overall performance to Vivo S19 Pro, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo S19 Pro has better overall performance than Oukitel WP38, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.