Compare Tools :
Date
May 2024
May 2022
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
Unknown
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
HarmonyOS 4.0
Android 12
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
-
MyOS 12
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
-
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G / CDMA / EVDO
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
-
Dual SIM, Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.2, A2DP, LE
5.2, A2DP, LE
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
261 x 177.2 x 6.2 mm
162.9 x 72.9 x 8.7 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
510 g
199 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Aluminum
Aluminum + Glass Case
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Black, White, Purple
Black, Gold, Blue
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
( ? )
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
( ? )
Adreno 650
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
8GB
8GB / 12GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
256GB
256GB / 521GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
-
-
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
11.5"
6.67"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
IPS LCD
AMOLED
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
1840 x 2800 pixels
1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~291 ppi density, 144Hz
20:9 ratio, (~395 ppi density), 144Hz, 1B Colors
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
8800 mAh
5000 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 22.5W
Fast charging 66W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Single Setup
Quad Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
13 MP, AF
(Main) 100 MP, f/1.9, 1/1.52", PDAF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
-
(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
-
(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
8 MP, f/2.2
16 MP
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
-
Stereo Speaker
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
-
Fingerprint (under display)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
-
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
-
Yes
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Gyro, Compass
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $430
~ $460
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €420
~ €450
Price in Euros (EUR).
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S and ZTE Axon 40 Pro share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with aluminum materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S and ZTE Axon 40 Pro becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of aluminum.
While the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S features with a standard cover, the ZTE Axon 40 Pro distinguishes itself by elevating its design with a more luxurious glass cover, adding an extra layer of sophistication and durability. The incorporation of a glass cover sets the ZTE Axon 40 Pro apart, not only in terms of aesthetics but also in the tactile and visual experience it offers. Beyond the surface level appeal, the glass cover enhances the device durability, providing robust yet stylish protection. This distinction makes the ZTE Axon 40 Pro more intriguing than the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S, as it caters to individuals seeking a combination of elegance and resilience in their device.
In terms of visual quality performance, the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S with its ~291 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the ZTE Axon 40 Pro, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~395. The ZTE Axon 40 Pro gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.
This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the ZTE Axon 40 Pro, its elevated ppi of ~395 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S.
In the realm of display hardware, the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the ZTE Axon 40 Pro boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The ZTE Axon 40 Pro displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.
From the screen refresh rate features, the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S and the ZTE Axon 40 Pro align with their 144Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S and the ZTE Axon 40 Pro find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.
Comparing the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S that which lacks mobile SIM support, with the ZTE Axon 40 Pro boasting 5G capabilities, reveals a notable disparity. The absence of mobile SIM support in the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S places it at a distinct disadvantage, especially for those reliant on seamless connectivity through mobile networks. In situations where users prioritize mobile SIM features, the ZTE Axon 40 Pro emerges as the preferred choice.
Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Huawei MatePad 11.5 S and ZTE Axon 40 Pro are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 6 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Huawei MatePad 11.5 S nor ZTE Axon 40 Pro holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S and ZTE Axon 40 Pro both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.2 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S and the ZTE Axon 40 Pro, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.
From the NFC technology perspective, Huawei MatePad 11.5 S lacks the NFC feature, while the ZTE Axon 40 Pro comes equipped with it, making the ZTE Axon 40 Pro notably superior. The NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless technology facilitating smooth data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S restricts its capabilities for convenient applications like quick file sharing, contactless payments, and seamless connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. Conversely, the inclusion of NFC in the ZTE Axon 40 Pro enhances its versatility, providing users with an extended range of applications.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Examining the specification data, Huawei MatePad 11.5 S offers a RAM configuration of 8GB, while the ZTE Axon 40 Pro boasts a more substantial 8GB / 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the ZTE Axon 40 Pro holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Referencing the specifications, Huawei MatePad 11.5 S offers internal storage options ranging from 256GB, while ZTE Axon 40 Pro surpasses this with an impressive 256GB / 521GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in ZTE Axon 40 Pro, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. ZTE Axon 40 Pro stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.
Currently, it is challenging to assess the gaming experience on both devices as the essential data required for a comprehensive comparison is not yet available. Without a complete set of data, any attempt to measure and compare the gaming performance would lack the necessary foundation for accurate analysis. Once the requisite information is gathered, a more informed and reliable evaluation can be conducted, enabling a clearer understanding of the gaming experience on each device and facilitating a more meaningful comparison of their respective capabilities.
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S appears to be in for some tough competition from the ZTE Axon 40 Pro. While the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S settles for a Single Setup, the ZTE Axon 40 Pro takes things up a notch with its impressive Quad Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the ZTE Axon 40 Pro promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Single Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the ZTE Axon 40 Pro in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.
Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S introduces a 13 MP camera, while the ZTE Axon 40 Pro boasts an impressive 100 MP. In this aspect, the ZTE Axon 40 Pro holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.
This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the ZTE Axon 40 Pro, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.
When discussing front camera features, the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S and ZTE Axon 40 Pro appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S and ZTE Axon 40 Pro. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the ZTE Axon 40 Pro holds a distinct advantage over the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S. The ZTE Axon 40 Pro boasts a larger 16 MP front camera, while the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S features a 8 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the ZTE Axon 40 Pro provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.
Sadly, the both of Huawei MatePad 11.5 S and ZTE Axon 40 Pro are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S and ZTE Axon 40 Pro may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.
Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S and the ZTE Axon 40 Pro becomes a notable advantage. The Huawei MatePad 11.5 S, equipped with an impressive 8800 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the ZTE Axon 40 Pro 5000 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Huawei MatePad 11.5 S robust 8800 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.
In a positive development, both the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S and ZTE Axon 40 Pro incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the ZTE Axon 40 Pro emerges as the more advanced choice. The ZTE Axon 40 Pro boasts a Fast Charging capability of 66W, surpassing the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S 22W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the ZTE Axon 40 Pro as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the ZTE Axon 40 Pro ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.
At the security features, it becomes evident that the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S falls short in comparison to the ZTE Axon 40 Pro. The Huawei MatePad 11.5 S lacks any dedicated biometric sensor, a notable distinction from the ZTE Axon 40 Pro, where a dedicated biometric sensor is present. This disparity underscores that, in terms of security, the ZTE Axon 40 Pro holds a distinct advantage over the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S. The absence of a dedicated biometric sensor on the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S emphasizes the ZTE Axon 40 Pro superior security features, offering users a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Huawei MatePad 11.5 S has better overall performance than ZTE Axon 40 Pro, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Huawei MatePad 11.5 S has a very similar overall performance to ZTE Axon 40 Pro, based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that ZTE Axon 40 Pro has better overall performance than Huawei MatePad 11.5 S, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.
