Teclast P30

Teclast P30

Dual Setup

544 gram

6000 mAh

Android 14

10.1" (Inch)

4GB RAM

Allview X5 Soul

Allview X5 Soul

Dual Setup

185 gram

3000 mAh

Android 8.1

5.86" (Inch)

4GB RAM

Announced

Date

March 2024

August 2018

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

Unknown

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 14

Android 8.1

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

Android Stock UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

-

2G / 3G / 4G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

-

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

70
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.4, A2DP, LE

4.2, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

242.4 x 161.3 x 8.7 mm

149 x 72 x 7.9 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

544 g

185 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Plastic

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Blue

Black

Official available body color options.

Score

75
75

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Allwinner A523

Mediatek Helio P22

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G57

PowerVR GE8320

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

95
95

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

4GB

4GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

64GB

32GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

95
95

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

10.1"

5.86"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

800 x 1280 pixels

720 x 1520 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~149 ppi density

19:9 ratio, (~287 ppi density)

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

6000 mAh

3000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

-

-

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

85
85

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Dual Setup

Dual Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 5 MP, AF

(Main) 16 MP, f/2.0, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Depth) 0.3 MP

(Depth) 5 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

2 MP

16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm, 1/3.06", 1.0µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 720p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

85
85

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

-

Fingerprint (at the back)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

-

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

-

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

80
90

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $100

~ $330

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €90

~ €320

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Teclast P30 with its ~149 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Allview X5 Soul, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~287. The Allview X5 Soul gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Allview X5 Soul, its elevated ppi of ~287 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Teclast P30.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Teclast P30 and the Allview X5 Soul align with their 60Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Teclast P30 and the Allview X5 Soul find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

Comparing the Teclast P30 that which lacks mobile SIM support, with the Allview X5 Soul boasting 4G capabilities, reveals a notable disparity. The absence of mobile SIM support in the Teclast P30 places it at a distinct disadvantage, especially for those reliant on seamless connectivity through mobile networks. In situations where users prioritize mobile SIM features, the Allview X5 Soul emerges as the preferred choice.

Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul. First, the Teclast P30 features Wi-Fi 6, while Allview X5 Soul utilizes by Wi-Fi 5 technology. From a technical standpoint, Teclast P30 holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 6 offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 5. Consequently, the Teclast P30 ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Allview X5 Soul.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Teclast P30 is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.4, surpassing the Allview X5 Soul, which only utilizes Bluetooth 4.2. This condition gives the Teclast P30 a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.4 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 4.2. Therefore, the Teclast P30 is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Allview X5 Soul.

Unfortunately, both the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul lack NFC features, resulting in a tie between them. The absence of NFC constrains these devices in terms of modern connectivity and functionality. NFC serves as a wireless technology that enables seamless data exchange between devices in close proximity, offering diverse applications such as contactless payments, swift file sharing, and simplified pairing with other compatible devices. Consequently, users of Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul may encounter limitations in fully exploiting the potential for hassle free connectivity.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Teclast P30 is equipped with 4GB of RAM, while the Allview X5 Soul offers a range of 4GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Teclast P30 emerges as the superior choice over Allview X5 Soul, evident in its internal memory configuration of 64GB, surpassing the 32GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Teclast P30 higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Differing from the Teclast P30, the Allview X5 Soul stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Teclast P30, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Teclast P30 adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the Allwinner A523 processor coupled with the Mali-G57. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Teclast P30 may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Teclast P30 sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, Allview X5 Soul is equipped with entry-level hardware, featuring the Mediatek Helio P22 processor and PowerVR GE8320. While not tailored for hardcore gaming enthusiasts, this device still holds its ground for casual gaming experiences. The combination of the Mediatek Helio P22 and PowerVR GE8320 allows the Allview X5 Soul to handle less graphics intensive games smoothly and efficiently. However, its technical specifications suggest that it might struggle with the demands of high-end, resource intensive gaming. Nevertheless, for users looking for a budget friendly smartphone that can handle everyday tasks and provide a decent gaming experience at lower to mid-level graphic settings, the Allview X5 Soul remains a viable and cost effective option.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul is likely to be comparable.

For an optimal gaming experience, the Teclast P30 distinguishes itself with its notably larger 10.1" screen, surpassing the Allview X5 Soul, which features a comparatively smaller 5.86" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul stand on equal footing with identical 60Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 60Hz refresh rate shared by Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul share a common ground, utilizing a Dual Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Teclast P30 introduces a 5 MP camera, while the Allview X5 Soul boasts an impressive 16 MP. In this aspect, the Allview X5 Soul holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Teclast P30. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Allview X5 Soul, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Allview X5 Soul holds a distinct advantage over the Teclast P30. The Allview X5 Soul boasts a larger 16 MP front camera, while the Teclast P30 features a 2 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Allview X5 Soul provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Sadly, the both of Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Teclast P30 and the Allview X5 Soul becomes a notable advantage. The Teclast P30, equipped with an impressive 6000 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the Allview X5 Soul 3000 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Teclast P30 as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Teclast P30 robust 6000 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.

Talking on fast charging capabilities, the Teclast P30 and Allview X5 Soul share a similar standing, as neither device is equipped with a fast charging feature. With both smartphones relying solely on standard charging methods, the absence of rapid charging technology levels the playing field. Consequently, users can expect a comparable charging experience from both the Teclast P30 and the Allview X5 Soul, eliminating any significant advantage in this aspect. The absence of fast charging features positions the devices on equal footing, resulting in a tie when it comes to evaluating their charging capabilities.

Security Features

At the security features, it becomes evident that the Teclast P30 falls short in comparison to the Allview X5 Soul. The Teclast P30 lacks any dedicated biometric sensor, a notable distinction from the Allview X5 Soul, where a dedicated biometric sensor is present. This disparity underscores that, in terms of security, the Allview X5 Soul holds a distinct advantage over the Teclast P30. The absence of a dedicated biometric sensor on the Teclast P30 emphasizes the Allview X5 Soul superior security features, offering users a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Expandable storage with external memory card

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • No fast charging feature supported
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Mobile network not available
  • No SIM Card function supported
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Relatively small internal memory capacity

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • No fast charging feature supported
  • Relatively small RAM capacity
  • Relatively small internal memory capacity
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Teclast P30

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 95
Memory : 95
Network : 70
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 85
Sensor : 80
Audio : 95

Allview X5 Soul

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 95
Memory : 95
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 85
Sensor : 90
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Teclast P30

Teclast P30

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Teclast P30 has better overall performance than Allview X5 Soul, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Teclast P30 has a very similar overall performance to Allview X5 Soul, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Allview X5 Soul

Allview X5 Soul

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Allview X5 Soul has better overall performance than Teclast P30, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Teclast P30

Teclast P30

Amazon
Allview X5 Soul

Allview X5 Soul

Amazon