Durability

The build quality of the Poco F4 GT surpasses that of the Vivo Y78t, owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Poco F4 GT features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Vivo Y78t. The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Poco F4 GT aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Vivo Y78t plastic construction.

While the Vivo Y78t features with a standard cover, the Poco F4 GT distinguishes itself by elevating its design with a more luxurious glass cover, adding an extra layer of sophistication and durability. The incorporation of a glass cover sets the Poco F4 GT apart, not only in terms of aesthetics but also in the tactile and visual experience it offers. Beyond the surface level appeal, the glass cover enhances the device durability, providing robust yet stylish protection. This distinction makes the Poco F4 GT more intriguing than the Vivo Y78t, as it caters to individuals seeking a combination of elegance and resilience in their device.

In terms of screen protection performance, the Vivo Y78t appears rather basic as it notably lacks screen protection glass. On the contrary, the Poco F4 GT distinguishes itself with the inclusion of scratch-resistant glass, making it a more advanced choice in this aspect. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Poco F4 GT not only safeguards the screen against daily wear and tear but also provides a crucial layer of defense against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature significantly enhances the device's durability and longevity, offering users peace of mind and a more resilient smartphone experience.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT deliver similar results, both featuring a typical pixel density of ~395 pixels per inch (ppi). The identical ppi values in both devices imply that they share the same level of pixel concentration within a one inch square on their displays. Consequently, their visual quality remains consistent, resulting in a tie between the two in terms of display clarity and sharpness. The matching ppi values suggest that users can expect a comparable visual experience from both the Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT, highlighting their similarity in this particular aspect of performance.

In the realm of display hardware, the Vivo Y78t is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Poco F4 GT boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Poco F4 GT displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Vivo Y78t and the Poco F4 GT align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Vivo Y78t and the Poco F4 GT find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Vivo Y78t that equipped with Wi-Fi 5, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Poco F4 GT which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 6 technology. This distinction positions the Poco F4 GT at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 6 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 5. So, the Poco F4 GT with Wi-Fi 6 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Vivo Y78t, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Vivo Y78t equipped with Bluetooth 5.1, while the Poco F4 GT comes with more latest Bluetooth 5.2 technology. In this scenario, Poco F4 GT holds a technological advantage by adopting the more recent Bluetooth technology. Bluetooth 5.2 brings improvements in terms of enhanced services, better connection performance, and increased accuracy in device positioning. Therefore, the integration of Bluetooth 5.2 in the Poco F4 GT positions it as the superior choice in Bluetooth technology, offering users a more advanced experience when compared with the Vivo Y78t.

From the NFC technology perspective, Vivo Y78t lacks the NFC feature, while the Poco F4 GT comes equipped with it, making the Poco F4 GT notably superior. The NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless technology facilitating smooth data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Vivo Y78t restricts its capabilities for convenient applications like quick file sharing, contactless payments, and seamless connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. Conversely, the inclusion of NFC in the Poco F4 GT enhances its versatility, providing users with an extended range of applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Vivo Y78t is equipped with 8GB / 12GB of RAM, while the Poco F4 GT offers a range of 8GB / 12GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Vivo Y78t presents a range of 128GB / 256GB of internal memory storage, while Poco F4 GT offers a 128GB / 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Vivo Y78t stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 paired with the Adreno 710. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 710 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Vivo Y78t, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Poco F4 GT stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor and the Adreno 730. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 730 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Poco F4 GT excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Poco F4 GT emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT is likely to be comparable.

To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Vivo Y78t is equipped with a 6.64" screen, slightly smaller than the Poco F4 GT, which boasts a 6.67" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The Poco F4 GT marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

Vivo Y78t appears to be in for some tough competition from the Poco F4 GT. While the Vivo Y78t settles for a Dual Setup, the Poco F4 GT takes things up a notch with its impressive Triple Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Poco F4 GT promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Vivo Y78t Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Poco F4 GT in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Vivo Y78t introduces a 50 MP camera, while the Poco F4 GT boasts an impressive 64 MP. In this aspect, the Poco F4 GT holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Vivo Y78t. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Poco F4 GT, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Poco F4 GT holds a distinct advantage over the Vivo Y78t. The Poco F4 GT boasts a larger 20 MP front camera, while the Vivo Y78t features a 8 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Poco F4 GT provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Sadly, the both of Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Vivo Y78t surpasses the Poco F4 GT. The Vivo Y78t boasts a substantial 6000 mAh battery, while the Poco F4 GT falls slightly behind with a 4700 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Vivo Y78t as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Vivo Y78t is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Poco F4 GT.

In a positive development, both the Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Poco F4 GT emerges as the more advanced choice. The Poco F4 GT boasts a Fast Charging capability of 120W, surpassing the Vivo Y78t 44W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Poco F4 GT as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Poco F4 GT ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Vivo Y78t and Poco F4 GT, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.