Compare Tools :
Date
June 2023
May 2024
Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.
GTIN / MPN
Unknown
V2343A
Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.
OS
Android 13
Android 14
Operating system type (OS) and version number.
Firmware
Android Stock UI
OriginOS 4.0
Specific firmware name used on the device.
Bands
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
2G / 3G / 4G / 5G
Available mobile network support options.
SIM
Dual SIM, Nano SIM
Single / Dual Nano SIM
Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.
Score
Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.
In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band
Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.
Bluetooth
5.1, A2DP, LE
5.1, A2DP, LE
Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.
USB
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Type of connectivity port hardware.
Score
Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.
Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.
In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.
Dimension
165 x 75.8 x 8.6 mm
164.4 x 74.8 x 8 mm
Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).
Weight
193.8 g
190 g
Weight of the device in grams.
Material
Plastic
Plastic
Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.
Color Options
Black, Purple
Black, White, Orange
Official available body color options.
Score
The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.
In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.
However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.
CPU
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.
GPU
Adreno 619
Adreno 710
Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.
Score
The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.
The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.
We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.
The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.
RAM
4GB / 6GB
8GB / 12GB
Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.
Internal
128GB
128GB / 256GB / 512GB
Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.
External
MicroSDXC
-
Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.
Score
Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.
For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.
Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.
We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.
However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.
Size
6.56"
6.78"
Screen size in inches.
Panel
IPS LCD
AMOLED
Type of display panel hardware.
Resolution
720 x 1612 pixels
1080 x 2400 pixels
Screen resolution in pixels.
Other
~269 ppi density, 90Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass 3
~388 ppi density, 120Hz
Any extra display and screen features if available.
Score
To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.
A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.
A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.
Type
Li-Po
Li-Po
Type of battery model.
Capacity
5000 mAh
6000 mAh
Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).
Feature
Fast charging 20W
Fast charging 44W
Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.
Charger Model
USB Type-C
USB Type-C
Charging method and type of charger port model.
Score
A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.
To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.
We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.
It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.
Rear
Triple Setup
Dual Setup
Total number of rear cameras.
+
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, AF
(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, PDAF
Details of the main camera unit.
+
(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4
(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4
Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.
+
(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4
-
Details of the third camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.
Front
Single Setup
Single Setup
Total front camera number, if available.
+
8 MP
8 MP, f/2.1
Details of the main front camera unit, if available.
+
-
-
Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.
Feature
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Video Recording 1080p@30fps
Available video recording support and features.
Score
The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.
Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.
A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.
For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.
Type
Loudspeaker
Loudspeaker
Primary sound system type.
Extras
3.5mm jack
Stereo Speaker
Extra sound system features.
Score
For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.
To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.
Biometric
Fingerprint (at the side)
Fingerprint (under display)
Biometric security hardware model, if available.
GPS
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.
NFC
-
-
Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.
Other
Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass
Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass
Available sensor hardware type and function.
Score
Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.
To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.
The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.
USD
~ $260
~ $210
Price in US dollars (USD).
EUR
~ €250
~ €200
Price in Euros (EUR).
Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China) share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with plastic materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China) becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of plastic.
Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China).
When it comes to screen protection, the Nokia G42 5G stands out as the superior choice. With its pre installed scratch-resistant glass, the Nokia G42 5G offers users a robust defense against daily wear and potential damage. In contrast, the Vivo Y200 (China) lacks notable screen protection features. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Nokia G42 5G not only ensures the longevity and durability of the device but also provides users with a reliable shield against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature enhances the overall user experience by minimizing the risk of screen damage and offering a more resilient device.
In terms of visual quality performance, the Nokia G42 5G with its ~269 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Vivo Y200 (China), which boasts an even higher ppi of ~388. The Vivo Y200 (China) gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.
This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Vivo Y200 (China), its elevated ppi of ~388 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Nokia G42 5G.
In the realm of display hardware, the Nokia G42 5G is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Vivo Y200 (China) boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Vivo Y200 (China) displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.
When considering the refresh rate feature, the Nokia G42 5G boasts a 90Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo Y200 (China) takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 120Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.
If we compare the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China), both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China) on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.
Assessing Wi-Fi technology reveals significant differences between the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China). First, the Nokia G42 5G features Wi-Fi 6, while Vivo Y200 (China) utilizes by Wi-Fi 5 technology. From a technical standpoint, Nokia G42 5G holds superiority given that Wi-Fi 6 offers heightened speeds, increased capacity, and superior performance compared to Wi-Fi 5. Consequently, the Nokia G42 5G ensures a more seamless and efficient connectivity experience than Vivo Y200 (China).
Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China) both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.1 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Nokia G42 5G and the Vivo Y200 (China), as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.
Unfortunately, both the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China) lack NFC features, resulting in a tie between them. The absence of NFC constrains these devices in terms of modern connectivity and functionality. NFC serves as a wireless technology that enables seamless data exchange between devices in close proximity, offering diverse applications such as contactless payments, swift file sharing, and simplified pairing with other compatible devices. Consequently, users of Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China) may encounter limitations in fully exploiting the potential for hassle free connectivity.
In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.
Examining the specification data, Nokia G42 5G offers a RAM configuration of 4GB / 6GB, while the Vivo Y200 (China) boasts a more substantial 8GB / 12GB RAM range. Clearly, the Vivo Y200 (China) holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.
Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.
Referencing the specifications, Nokia G42 5G offers internal storage options ranging from 128GB, while Vivo Y200 (China) surpasses this with an impressive 128GB / 256GB / 512GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in Vivo Y200 (China), allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. Vivo Y200 (China) stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.
Differing from the Nokia G42 5G, the Vivo Y200 (China) stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Nokia G42 5G, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.
Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.
First, The Nokia G42 5G boasts a formidable combination of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ processor and Adreno 619, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ and Adreno 619 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Nokia G42 5G to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.
Next, Vivo Y200 (China) stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 processor and the Adreno 710. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 710 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Vivo Y200 (China) excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Vivo Y200 (China) emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.
Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Nokia G42 5G comes with less RAM than Vivo Y200 (China). Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the Vivo Y200 (China) holds an advantage over the Nokia G42 5G due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the Vivo Y200 (China), as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.
Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the Nokia G42 5G and the Vivo Y200 (China) may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The Nokia G42 5G, equipped with a 6.56" screen, is notably smaller than the Vivo Y200 (China), which boasts a more generous 6.78" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the Vivo Y200 (China), offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the Vivo Y200 (China), with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.
Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the Nokia G42 5G boasts a 90Hz refresh rate, while the Vivo Y200 (China) takes it up a notch with an impressive 120Hz capability. This distinction places the Vivo Y200 (China) in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.
The main camera setup of the Nokia G42 5G surpasses that Vivo Y200 (China), offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The Nokia G42 5G boasts Triple Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the Vivo Y200 (China) falls behind with its Dual Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the Nokia G42 5G enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.
Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China) are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 50 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China) on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.
When discussing front camera features, the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China) appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China). While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.
When look on to front camera features of the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China), a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 8 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China) stand on equal footing with an 8 MP configuration.
Sadly, the both of Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China) are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China) may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.
Examining the specifications in battery power, it becomes evident that the Nokia G42 5G falls short in comparison to the Vivo Y200 (China). The Nokia G42 5G is equipped with a 5000 mAh battery, whereas the Vivo Y200 (China) boasts a more substantial 6000 mAh capacity. This slight but significant difference in battery capacity positions the Vivo Y200 (China) as the preferable choice for those prioritizing extended usage. The higher milliampere-hour rating of the Vivo Y200 (China) translates to a potentially longer lasting power performance, highlighting the importance of even small disparities in battery capacities when evaluating the overall endurance of devices.
In a positive development, both the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China) incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Vivo Y200 (China) emerges as the more advanced choice. The Vivo Y200 (China) boasts a Fast Charging capability of 44W, surpassing the Nokia G42 5G 20W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Vivo Y200 (China) as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Vivo Y200 (China) ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.
Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Nokia G42 5G and Vivo Y200 (China), as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.
Pros list
No notable advantages found on this device
No notable advantages found on this device
Cons list
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
No significant disadvantage features found on this device
Point Result
Final Score
/ 1000
/ 1000
The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.
However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.
Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Nokia G42 5G has better overall performance than Vivo Y200 (China), based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Nokia G42 5G has a very similar overall performance to Vivo Y200 (China), based on the final score data.
After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo Y200 (China) has better overall performance than Nokia G42 5G, based on the final score data.
[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.
Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.
It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.
