Ulefone Armor 21

Ulefone Armor 21

Dual Setup

400 gram

9600 mAh

Android 13

6.58" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Tecno Camon 20 Pro

Tecno Camon 20 Pro

Triple Setup

( ? )ram

5000 mAh

Android 13

6.67" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Announced

Date

May 2023

May 2023

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

CK7n

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 13

Android 13

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

Android Stock UI

HiOS 13

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G

2G / 3G / 4G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

90
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE

5.2, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

80
90

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

176 x 81.6 x 18.1 mm

162.7 x 75.9 x 7.9 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

400 g

( ? )

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Polycarbonate Case, IP68 Rated, MIL-STD-810H

Plastic + Glass / Leather Case

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black

Black, Blue

Official available body color options.

Score

100
95

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Helio G99

Mediatek Helio G99

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G57 MC2

Mali-G57 MC2

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB

8GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB

256GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.58"

6.67"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

AMOLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2408 pixels

1080 x 2400 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~401 ppi density, 120Hz

20:9 ratio, (~395 ppi density), 120Hz

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

9600 mAh

5000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 33W

Fast charging 33W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Dual Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.9, 0.8µm, PDAF

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.7, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Night Vision) 20 MP, f/1.8

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Depth) 0.3 MP

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

16 MP, f/2.2, 1.0µm

32 MP

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

85
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack, HiFi Speaker

3.5mm jack, Dual Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the side)

Fingerprint (under display)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $410

~ $250

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €400

~ €240

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The Ulefone Armor 21 stands as a rugged phone, purpose built to excel in challenging environments, while the Tecno Camon 20 Pro represents a standard smartphone design. When it comes to navigating extreme conditions, the Ulefone Armor 21 takes the lead, offering superior build quality tailored for durability. Unlike the standard design of the Tecno Camon 20 Pro, the Ulefone Armor 21 features a reinforced casing constructed from robust materials, ensuring resistance to impacts, drops, and shocks. This enhanced structural integrity equips the Ulefone Armor 21 to endure the rigors of harsh environments with greater resilience than the Tecno Camon 20 Pro.

While the Ulefone Armor 21 features with a standard cover, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro distinguishes itself by elevating its design with a more luxurious glass cover, adding an extra layer of sophistication and durability. The incorporation of a glass cover sets the Tecno Camon 20 Pro apart, not only in terms of aesthetics but also in the tactile and visual experience it offers. Beyond the surface level appeal, the glass cover enhances the device durability, providing robust yet stylish protection. This distinction makes the Tecno Camon 20 Pro more intriguing than the Ulefone Armor 21, as it caters to individuals seeking a combination of elegance and resilience in their device.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Ulefone Armor 21 outshines the Tecno Camon 20 Pro, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~401, the Ulefone Armor 21 surpasses the Tecno Camon 20 Pro, which boasts ~395 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Ulefone Armor 21 elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Tecno Camon 20 Pro.

In the realm of display hardware, the Ulefone Armor 21 is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Tecno Camon 20 Pro displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Ulefone Armor 21 and the Tecno Camon 20 Pro align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Ulefone Armor 21 and the Tecno Camon 20 Pro find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro, both are supported by 4G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 4G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Ulefone Armor 21 that equipped with Wi-Fi 4, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Tecno Camon 20 Pro which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 5 technology. This distinction positions the Tecno Camon 20 Pro at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 5 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 4. So, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro with Wi-Fi 5 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Ulefone Armor 21, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.2 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Ulefone Armor 21 and the Tecno Camon 20 Pro, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Now, Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Ulefone Armor 21 is equipped with 8GB of RAM, while the Tecno Camon 20 Pro offers a range of 8GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Ulefone Armor 21 presents a range of 256GB of internal memory storage, while Tecno Camon 20 Pro offers a 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Ulefone Armor 21 boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Helio G99 processor and Mali-G57 MC2, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Helio G99 and Mali-G57 MC2 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Ulefone Armor 21 to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Tecno Camon 20 Pro features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Mediatek Helio G99 processor and Mali-G57 MC2. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Mediatek Helio G99 and Mali-G57 MC2 tandem enables the Tecno Camon 20 Pro to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro is likely to be comparable.

To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Ulefone Armor 21 is equipped with a 6.58" screen, slightly smaller than the Tecno Camon 20 Pro, which boasts a 6.67" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The Tecno Camon 20 Pro marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

Ulefone Armor 21 appears to be in for some tough competition from the Tecno Camon 20 Pro. While the Ulefone Armor 21 settles for a Dual Setup, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro takes things up a notch with its impressive Triple Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Ulefone Armor 21 Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Tecno Camon 20 Pro in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 64 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.

Ulefone Armor 21 stands out in the realm of smartphone cameras with its unique feature on main camera sector, that is already supported by Night Vision camera support, a capability notably absent in the Tecno Camon 20 Pro. Night Vision cameras are specialized sensors equipped with advanced infrared technology, enabling them to capture clear and detailed images even in low light or complete darkness. This innovative feature provides users with enhanced visibility during nighttime or low light scenarios, making the Ulefone Armor 21 particularly advantageous for capturing moments in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of Night Vision on the Tecno Camon 20 Pro may limit its performance in such environments, giving the Ulefone Armor 21 a notable edge for users who prioritize superior camera capabilities, especially in low light situations.

When discussing front camera features, the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

Inspecting the front camera specifications, it appears that the Tecno Camon 20 Pro holds a distinct advantage over the Ulefone Armor 21. The Tecno Camon 20 Pro boasts a larger 32 MP front camera, while the Ulefone Armor 21 features a 16 MP front camera. In the realm of photography, a larger megapixel count is generally considered better as it translates to higher image resolution. More megapixels mean the camera can capture finer details and produce sharper images. For front facing cameras, this becomes particularly crucial in the context of selfies, where users often desire clear and detailed self portraits. The larger megapixel count on the Tecno Camon 20 Pro provides a potential for more clarity, allowing users to capture more intricate facial features and nuances in their selfies, thus contributing to an overall enhanced imaging experience.

Sadly, the both of Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Ulefone Armor 21 and the Tecno Camon 20 Pro becomes a notable advantage. The Ulefone Armor 21, equipped with an impressive 9600 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5000 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Ulefone Armor 21 as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Ulefone Armor 21 robust 9600 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.

In the realm of fast charging features, the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro stand shoulder to shoulder, as both devices are equipped with the identical Fast Charging 33W capability. This parity in charging technology ensures that users can expect a similar and efficient charging experience from both devices. With neither device holding a distinct advantage in terms of charging speed, the result is a tie. The shared Fast Charging 33W feature positions the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro on an equal footing, making them both suitable choices for users seeking a reliable and reasonably fast battery charging performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Ulefone Armor 21 and Tecno Camon 20 Pro, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Average WLAN connection speed

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Average WLAN connection speed

Benchmark

Point Result

Ulefone Armor 21

Build Quality : 100
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 90
Connectivity : 80
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Tecno Camon 20 Pro

Build Quality : 95
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Ulefone Armor 21

Ulefone Armor 21

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Ulefone Armor 21 has better overall performance than Tecno Camon 20 Pro, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Ulefone Armor 21 has a very similar overall performance to Tecno Camon 20 Pro, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Tecno Camon 20 Pro

Tecno Camon 20 Pro

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Tecno Camon 20 Pro has better overall performance than Ulefone Armor 21, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Ulefone Armor 21

Ulefone Armor 21

Amazon
Tecno Camon 20 Pro

Tecno Camon 20 Pro

Amazon