Vivo V25e (Mexico)

Vivo V25e (Mexico)

Triple Setup

185 gram

4600 mAh

Android 13

6.62" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Huawei Nova 9 Pro

Huawei Nova 9 Pro

Quad Setup

186 gram

4000 mAh

HarmonyOS 2.0

6.72" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Announced

Date

May 2023

September 2021

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

RTE-AL00

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 13

HarmonyOS 2.0

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

FuntouchOS 13

-

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G

2G / 3G / 4G / CDMA / EVDO

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

90
90

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE

5.2, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

90
100

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

162.5 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm

163.4 x 74.4 x 8 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

185 g

186 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Aluminum

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, Purple

Black, Blue, Green, Violet

Official available body color options.

Score

75
85

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Helio G99

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali G57

Adreno 642L

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB

8GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB

128GB / 256GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.62"

6.72"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

AMOLED

OLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2400 pixels

1236 x 2676 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~398 ppi density, 120Hz

19.5:9 ratio, (~439 ppi density), 120Hz, 1B Colors, HDR10

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

4600 mAh

4000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 67W

Fast charging 100W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Quad Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.79, PDAF

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm, PDAF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Dual Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

32 MP, f/2.0

(Main) 32 MP, f/2.0

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Ultrawide) 32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@60fps / 1080p@120fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
100

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

-

-

Extra sound system features.

Score

85
85

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

Fingerprint (under display)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Yes, Dual-Band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

-

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

90
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $360

~ $370

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €350

~ €360

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The build quality of the Huawei Nova 9 Pro surpasses that of the Vivo V25e (Mexico), owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Huawei Nova 9 Pro features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Vivo V25e (Mexico). The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Huawei Nova 9 Pro aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Vivo V25e (Mexico) plastic construction.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Vivo V25e (Mexico) with its ~398 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Huawei Nova 9 Pro, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~439. The Huawei Nova 9 Pro gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Huawei Nova 9 Pro, its elevated ppi of ~439 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Vivo V25e (Mexico).

In a general perspective, the Vivo V25e (Mexico) equipped with an AMOLED display panel, and the Huawei Nova 9 Pro also featuring an OLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and the Huawei Nova 9 Pro align with their 120Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and the Huawei Nova 9 Pro find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro, both are supported by 4G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 4G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Vivo V25e (Mexico) that equipped with Wi-Fi 5, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Huawei Nova 9 Pro which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 6 technology. This distinction positions the Huawei Nova 9 Pro at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 6 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 5. So, the Huawei Nova 9 Pro with Wi-Fi 6 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Vivo V25e (Mexico), ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.2 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and the Huawei Nova 9 Pro, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

From the NFC technology perspective, Vivo V25e (Mexico) lacks the NFC feature, while the Huawei Nova 9 Pro comes equipped with it, making the Huawei Nova 9 Pro notably superior. The NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless technology facilitating smooth data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Vivo V25e (Mexico) restricts its capabilities for convenient applications like quick file sharing, contactless payments, and seamless connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. Conversely, the inclusion of NFC in the Huawei Nova 9 Pro enhances its versatility, providing users with an extended range of applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Vivo V25e (Mexico) is equipped with 8GB of RAM, while the Huawei Nova 9 Pro offers a range of 8GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Vivo V25e (Mexico) presents a range of 256GB of internal memory storage, while Huawei Nova 9 Pro offers a 128GB / 256GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Highlighting a notable distinction, the Huawei Nova 9 Pro introduces an interesting feature by incorporating external memory expansion, a capability notably absent in the Vivo V25e (Mexico). This feature proves advantageous for users seeking enhanced storage flexibility. With external memory expansion, Huawei Nova 9 Pro users can easily amplify their device storage by adding a compatible external memory card. This becomes particularly beneficial for individuals who require additional space for storing diverse data, be it large files, multimedia content, or extra applications. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to tailor and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, offering a practical solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Vivo V25e (Mexico) boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Helio G99 processor and Mali G57, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Helio G99 and Mali G57 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Vivo V25e (Mexico) to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Huawei Nova 9 Pro features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G processor and Adreno 642L. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G and Adreno 642L tandem enables the Huawei Nova 9 Pro to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro is likely to be comparable.

To attain an optimal gaming experience, the Vivo V25e (Mexico) is equipped with a 6.62" screen, slightly smaller than the Huawei Nova 9 Pro, which boasts a 6.72" display. The nuanced distinction in screen size has the potential to result in a significant divergence in the gaming experience on both devices. A larger screen provides users with a more expansive and immersive view, playing a crucial role in appreciating intricate in-game details and navigating virtual environments effectively. This distinction becomes particularly evident in gaming scenarios that require precision and quick reactions. The Huawei Nova 9 Pro marginally larger screen size is likely to contribute to an enhanced and more immersive gaming experience, offering users a visually rich and engaging platform that can markedly influence the overall enjoyment of gaming sessions.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro stand on equal footing with identical 120Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 120Hz refresh rate shared by Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

Vivo V25e (Mexico) appears to be in for some tough competition from the Huawei Nova 9 Pro. While the Vivo V25e (Mexico) settles for a Triple Setup, the Huawei Nova 9 Pro takes things up a notch with its impressive Quad Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Huawei Nova 9 Pro promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Vivo V25e (Mexico) Triple Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Huawei Nova 9 Pro in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Vivo V25e (Mexico) emerges as a standout against the Huawei Nova 9 Pro, showcasing an impressive 64 MP camera, while the Huawei Nova 9 Pro only comes with 50 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Vivo V25e (Mexico), often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

Examining the front camera features, it's evident that the Huawei Nova 9 Pro outshines the Vivo V25e (Mexico) due to its Dual Setup, providing users with a more expansive and versatile photography experience. In contrast, the Vivo V25e (Mexico) is equipped with a Single Setup front camera, limiting its range of capabilities in comparison to the Huawei Nova 9 Pro. The Dual Setup configuration on the Huawei Nova 9 Pro not only enhances the potential for creative and high quality selfies but also offers users a broader set of options for capturing different perspectives. This notable difference in front camera setups positions the Huawei Nova 9 Pro as a more advanced and feature rich choice for those who prioritize a comprehensive front camera experience.

When look on to front camera features of the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 32 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro stand on equal footing with an 32 MP configuration.

After careful examination of the front camera features, it becomes evident that the Huawei Nova 9 Pro holds a distinct advantage over the Vivo V25e (Mexico). The significant disparity lies in the main features of the front facing camera, where the Huawei Nova 9 Pro is equipped with dedicated ultrawide camera lenses, a feature absent in the Vivo V25e (Mexico). This particular addition on the Huawei Nova 9 Pro contributes to a more versatile and expansive selfie-taking experience, allowing users to capture a broader field of view. In contrast, the absence of dedicated ultrawide lenses on the Vivo V25e (Mexico) may limit its capacity to offer a similarly immersive and dynamic front camera performance. As a result, the Huawei Nova 9 Pro emerges as the superior choice for individuals prioritizing advanced front camera features.

Sadly, the both of Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Vivo V25e (Mexico) surpasses the Huawei Nova 9 Pro. The Vivo V25e (Mexico) boasts a substantial 4600 mAh battery, while the Huawei Nova 9 Pro falls slightly behind with a 4000 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Vivo V25e (Mexico) as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Vivo V25e (Mexico) is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Huawei Nova 9 Pro.

In a positive development, both the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Huawei Nova 9 Pro emerges as the more advanced choice. The Huawei Nova 9 Pro boasts a Fast Charging capability of 100W, surpassing the Vivo V25e (Mexico) 67W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Huawei Nova 9 Pro as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Huawei Nova 9 Pro ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Vivo V25e (Mexico) and Huawei Nova 9 Pro, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Multiple front camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • Low quality body material used
  • Average WLAN connection speed
  • Average sound & audio quality

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Average sound & audio quality

Benchmark

Point Result

Vivo V25e (Mexico)

Build Quality : 75
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 90
Connectivity : 90
Battery : 100
Sensor : 90
Audio : 85

Huawei Nova 9 Pro

Build Quality : 85
Display : 100
Camera : 100
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 90
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 85

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Vivo V25e (Mexico)

Vivo V25e (Mexico)

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo V25e (Mexico) has better overall performance than Huawei Nova 9 Pro, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Vivo V25e (Mexico) has a very similar overall performance to Huawei Nova 9 Pro, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Huawei Nova 9 Pro

Huawei Nova 9 Pro

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Huawei Nova 9 Pro has better overall performance than Vivo V25e (Mexico), based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Vivo V25e (Mexico)

Vivo V25e (Mexico)

Amazon
Huawei Nova 9 Pro

Huawei Nova 9 Pro

Amazon