Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro

Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro

Dual Setup

490 gram

8600 mAh

Android 13

11.0" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Motorola Moto G100

Motorola Moto G100

Quad Setup

207 gram

5000 mAh

Android 11

6.7" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Announced

Date

April 2023

April 2021

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

23046RP50C

XT2125

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 13

Android 11

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

MIUI 14

Android Stock UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

-

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

-

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

70
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.2, A2DP, LE

5.1, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
100

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

253.9 x 165.1 x 6.5 mm

168.4 x 74 x 9.7 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

490 g

207 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Aluminum

Plastic

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, Blue, Gold

Gray, Blue, White

Official available body color options.

Score

85
75

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1

Qualcomm Snapdragon 870

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Adreno 730

Adreno 650

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB / 12GB

8GB / 12GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

128GB / 256GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

-

MicroSDXC

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

11.0"

6.7"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1800 x 2880 pixels

1080 x 2520 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

16:10 ratio, (~309 ppi density), 144Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass 3

21:9 ratio, (~409 ppi density), 90Hz, HDR10

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

8600 mAh

5000 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 67W

Fast charging 20W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Dual Setup

Quad Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, 1/2.76", f1.8, AF

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.7, 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, Laser AF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Depth) 2 MP

(Ultrawide) 16 MP, f/2.2, 117˚, 1.0µm, PDAF

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Depth) TOF 3D

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Dual Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

20 MP, f/2.2

(Main) 16 MP, f/2.2, 1.0µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.4, 118˚, 1.12µm

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 6K@30fps / 4K@60fps / 1080p@120fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

85
100

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

Stereo Speaker

3.5mm jack

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
95

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

-

Fingerprint (at the side)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS

Yes, Dual-Band A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Gyro

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

80
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $340

~ $430

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €330

~ €390

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro exhibits superior build quality compared to the Motorola Moto G100, primarily due to the difference in their construction materials. The Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro boasts an aluminum structure body, which generally enhances its overall sturdiness and premium feel. In contrast, the Motorola Moto G100 is constructed with plastic, a material that, while lightweight, tends to be less robust than aluminum. This distinction in materials contributes to the perception that the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro offers a more durable and higher quality build from a general perspective. The use of aluminum not only imparts a sense of solidity to the device but also suggests a greater resistance to wear and tear compared to the plastic construction of the Motorola Moto G100.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and Motorola Moto G100.

When it comes to screen protection, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro stands out as the superior choice. With its pre installed scratch-resistant glass, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro offers users a robust defense against daily wear and potential damage. In contrast, the Motorola Moto G100 lacks notable screen protection features. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro not only ensures the longevity and durability of the device but also provides users with a reliable shield against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature enhances the overall user experience by minimizing the risk of screen damage and offering a more resilient device.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro with its ~309 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Motorola Moto G100, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~409. The Motorola Moto G100 gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Motorola Moto G100, its elevated ppi of ~409 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and Motorola Moto G100 share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and Motorola Moto G100.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and the Motorola Moto G100, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 144Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Motorola Moto G100 with 90Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro with 144Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

Comparing the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro that which lacks mobile SIM support, with the Motorola Moto G100 boasting 5G capabilities, reveals a notable disparity. The absence of mobile SIM support in the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro places it at a distinct disadvantage, especially for those reliant on seamless connectivity through mobile networks. In situations where users prioritize mobile SIM features, the Motorola Moto G100 emerges as the preferred choice.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and Motorola Moto G100 are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 6 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro nor Motorola Moto G100 holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.2, surpassing the Motorola Moto G100, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.1. This condition gives the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.2 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.1. Therefore, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Motorola Moto G100.

Now, Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and Motorola Moto G100 stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro is equipped with 8GB / 12GB of RAM, while the Motorola Moto G100 offers a range of 8GB / 12GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro emerges as the superior choice over Motorola Moto G100, evident in its internal memory configuration of 128GB / 256GB / 512GB, surpassing the 128GB / 256GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 paired with the Adreno 730. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 730 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Motorola Moto G100 stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 processor and the Adreno 650. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 650 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Motorola Moto G100 excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Motorola Moto G100 emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and Motorola Moto G100 may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and Motorola Moto G100 is likely to be comparable.

For an optimal gaming experience, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro distinguishes itself with its notably larger 11.0" screen, surpassing the Motorola Moto G100, which features a comparatively smaller 6.7" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 144Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Motorola Moto G100 that only comes with 90Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro appears to be in for some tough competition from the Motorola Moto G100. While the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro settles for a Dual Setup, the Motorola Moto G100 takes things up a notch with its impressive Quad Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Motorola Moto G100 promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Motorola Moto G100 in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro introduces a 50 MP camera, while the Motorola Moto G100 boasts an impressive 64 MP. In this aspect, the Motorola Moto G100 holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the Motorola Moto G100, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

Examining the front camera features, it's evident that the Motorola Moto G100 outshines the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro due to its Dual Setup, providing users with a more expansive and versatile photography experience. In contrast, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro is equipped with a Single Setup front camera, limiting its range of capabilities in comparison to the Motorola Moto G100. The Dual Setup configuration on the Motorola Moto G100 not only enhances the potential for creative and high quality selfies but also offers users a broader set of options for capturing different perspectives. This notable difference in front camera setups positions the Motorola Moto G100 as a more advanced and feature rich choice for those who prioritize a comprehensive front camera experience.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro outshines the Motorola Moto G100, boasting a significantly higher 20 MP front camera compared to the 16 MP front camera on the Motorola Moto G100. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

After careful examination of the front camera features, it becomes evident that the Motorola Moto G100 holds a distinct advantage over the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro. The significant disparity lies in the main features of the front facing camera, where the Motorola Moto G100 is equipped with dedicated ultrawide camera lenses, a feature absent in the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro. This particular addition on the Motorola Moto G100 contributes to a more versatile and expansive selfie-taking experience, allowing users to capture a broader field of view. In contrast, the absence of dedicated ultrawide lenses on the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro may limit its capacity to offer a similarly immersive and dynamic front camera performance. As a result, the Motorola Moto G100 emerges as the superior choice for individuals prioritizing advanced front camera features.

Sadly, the both of Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and Motorola Moto G100 are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and Motorola Moto G100 may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Examining battery capacity, the substantial difference in power between the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and the Motorola Moto G100 becomes a notable advantage. The Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro, equipped with an impressive 8600 mAh battery, significantly outpaces the Motorola Moto G100 5000 mAh capacity. This considerable contrast in battery size not only positions the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro as the superior choice but also underscores the notion that a substantial variance in battery capacity is favorable. The Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro robust 8600 mAh battery ensures prolonged usage and enhanced endurance, emphasizing the positive impact of a significant disparity in battery capacities for users seeking extended device performance.

In a positive turn of events, both the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro and Motorola Moto G100 come equipped with fast charging features. However, upon closer inspection, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro emerges as the superior choice. While the Motorola Moto G100 offers a respectable 20W Fast Charging, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro outpaces it with a more robust Fast Charging 67W capability. This discrepancy in charging speeds positions the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro as the frontrunner in terms of battery charging time. The faster charging rate of the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro provides users with a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it the preferred option for those seeking rapid battery replenishment without compromising on performance.

Security Features

At the security features, it becomes evident that the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro falls short in comparison to the Motorola Moto G100. The Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro lacks any dedicated biometric sensor, a notable distinction from the Motorola Moto G100, where a dedicated biometric sensor is present. This disparity underscores that, in terms of security, the Motorola Moto G100 holds a distinct advantage over the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro. The absence of a dedicated biometric sensor on the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro emphasizes the Motorola Moto G100 superior security features, offering users a more advanced and secure means of device access and authentication.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Multiple front camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Mobile network not available
  • No SIM Card function supported

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Low quality body material used
  • Uses old Bluetooth version

Benchmark

Point Result

Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro

Build Quality : 85
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 70
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 80
Audio : 100

Motorola Moto G100

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 100
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro

Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro has better overall performance than Motorola Moto G100, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro has a very similar overall performance to Motorola Moto G100, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Motorola Moto G100

Motorola Moto G100

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Motorola Moto G100 has better overall performance than Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro

Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro

Amazon
Motorola Moto G100

Motorola Moto G100

Amazon