Tecno Spark 10 pro

Tecno Spark 10 pro

Dual Setup

208 gram

5000 mAh

Android 13

6.8" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Vivo X80

Vivo X80

Triple Setup

206 gram

4500 mAh

Android 12

6.56" (Inch)

8GB RAM

Announced

Date

March 2023

April 2022

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

V2183A

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 13

Android 12

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

HiOS 12.6

OriginOS Ocean

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

90
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.3, A2DP, LE

5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

80
100

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

168.4 x 76.2 x 8.4 mm

164.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

208 g

206 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Plastic

Aluminum + Glass Case

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, White

Black, Blue, Orange

Official available body color options.

Score

75
95

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Helio G88

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G52 MC2

Mali-G710 MC10

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB

8GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

128GB / 256GB

128GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

MicroSDXC

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.8"

6.56"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

IPS LCD

AMOLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2460 pixels

1080 x 2400 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

~395 ppi density, 90Hz

20:9 ratio, (~401 ppi density)

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

90
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Ion

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

5000 mAh

4500 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 18W

Fast charging 80W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Dual Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.6, PDAF

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, Laser AF, OIS

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Depth) 0.3 MP

(Tele) 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm, 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

-

(Ultrawide) 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm, 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

32 MP

32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@60fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

85
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

3.5mm jack

Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

95
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (at the side)

Fingerprint (under display)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $140

~ $550

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €130

~ €500

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

The build quality of the Vivo X80 surpasses that of the Tecno Spark 10 pro, owing to the difference in their construction materials. The Vivo X80 features an aluminum structure body, which generally offers a more robust and premium feel compared to the plastic build of the Tecno Spark 10 pro. The aluminum constructions tend to provide a sturdier and more durable build, suggesting a higher resistance to physical impacts and wear over time. In contrast, plastic, while lightweight, may be perceived as less resilient in terms of structural integrity. Thus, from a general perspective, the Vivo X80 aluminum build contributes to an overall better built device compared to the Tecno Spark 10 pro plastic construction.

While the Tecno Spark 10 pro features with a standard cover, the Vivo X80 distinguishes itself by elevating its design with a more luxurious glass cover, adding an extra layer of sophistication and durability. The incorporation of a glass cover sets the Vivo X80 apart, not only in terms of aesthetics but also in the tactile and visual experience it offers. Beyond the surface level appeal, the glass cover enhances the device durability, providing robust yet stylish protection. This distinction makes the Vivo X80 more intriguing than the Tecno Spark 10 pro, as it caters to individuals seeking a combination of elegance and resilience in their device.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Tecno Spark 10 pro with its ~395 pixels per inch (ppi), is in direct competition with the Vivo X80, which boasts an even higher ppi of ~401. The Vivo X80 gains an advantage in this comparison, as the higher ppi number signifies a more densely packed arrangement of pixels within a one inch square on its display.

This increased pixel density results in a sharper, more detailed visual experience. Pixels per inch (ppi) is a metric that quantifies the pixel density on a screen, and a higher ppi generally translates to a clearer display. In the case of the Vivo X80, its elevated ppi of ~401 indicates a superior capacity to render images, text, and videos with increased clarity, making it more adept at providing users with a visually striking and clear display compared to the Tecno Spark 10 pro.

In the realm of display hardware, the Tecno Spark 10 pro is exclusively equipped with an IPS LCD screen. While on the other hand, the Vivo X80 boasts a brilliant AMOLED display. The advantages of AMOLED technology become evident as it offers a superior visual experience compared to IPS LCD. The Vivo X80 displays deliver deeper blacks, higher contrast ratios, and more vibrant colors. This technology enables precise control and the ability to turn off pixels entirely, achieving true black and contributing to a visually stunning and immersive display with enhanced color accuracy.

When comparing the refresh rate time of the Tecno Spark 10 pro and the Vivo X80, the Tecno Spark 10 pro emerges as the superior choice due to its maximum 90Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Vivo X80 with 60Hz refresh rate. The refresh rate refers to the number of times per second a display refreshes its image. A higher refresh rate results in smoother and more responsive visuals, particularly noticeable during activities like scrolling through content or playing fast paced games. The Tecno Spark 10 pro with 90Hz refresh rate ensures a more fluid and seamless user experience, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall display quality. This feature not only contributes to a visually appealing interface but also elevates the device performance, making it more adept at handling dynamic content with precision and speed.

Connectivity Features

Comparing Vivo X80 that which is only features by 4G network connectivity, to the Tecno Spark 10 pro that already equipped with 5G capabilities, highlights a significant performance difference, with the latter inherently faster than Vivo X80. The inclusion of 5G technology in the Tecno Spark 10 pro positions it as a more advanced and future proof device, offering users faster data speeds and improved connectivity in the swiftly evolving landscape of network technologies. In contrast, the limited 4G network support in Vivo X80 may result in comparatively slower data transfer rates. Consequently the Tecno Spark 10 pro emerges as the superior choice for users prioritizing swift and efficient mobile connectivity experiences over the limitations of Vivo X80.

Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Tecno Spark 10 pro that equipped with Wi-Fi 4, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Vivo X80 which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 6 technology. This distinction positions the Vivo X80 at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 6 provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 4. So, the Vivo X80 with Wi-Fi 6 features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Tecno Spark 10 pro, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Tecno Spark 10 pro and Vivo X80 both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.3 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Tecno Spark 10 pro and the Vivo X80, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Now, Tecno Spark 10 pro and Vivo X80 stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Tecno Spark 10 pro is equipped with 8GB of RAM, while the Vivo X80 offers a range of 8GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Tecno Spark 10 pro emerges as the superior choice over Vivo X80, evident in its internal memory configuration of 128GB / 256GB, surpassing the 128GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Tecno Spark 10 pro higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Tecno Spark 10 pro boasts a formidable combination of the MediaTek Helio G88 processor and Mali-G52 MC2, making it a compelling choice for gamers within the mid-tier market segment. While it may not reach the extremes of flagship performance, the MediaTek Helio G88 and Mali-G52 MC2 collaboration ensures a commendable gaming experience. This smartphone caters well to the demands of the middle class gaming community, striking a balance between affordability and performance. The CPU and GPU specifications allows the Tecno Spark 10 pro to proficiently handle graphic intensive tasks at mid to high presets, providing users with a satisfying and immersive gaming performance without stretching the boundaries of budget constraints.

Next, Vivo X80 features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 processor and Mali-G710 MC10. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 and Mali-G710 MC10 tandem enables the Vivo X80 to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Tecno Spark 10 pro and Vivo X80 may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Tecno Spark 10 pro and Vivo X80 is likely to be comparable.

For an optimal gaming experience, the Tecno Spark 10 pro distinguishes itself with its notably larger 6.8" screen, surpassing the Vivo X80, which features a comparatively smaller 6.56" display. The discrepancy in screen size proves to be a significant factor, exerting a substantial impact on the gaming experience of these devices. A larger screen not only affords gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in game details and environments, but it also proves crucial in games that demand precision and swift reactions. Furthermore, the larger screen contributes to an even more immersive gaming atmosphere, ultimately elevating the overall enjoyment of the gaming experience.

Comparing the screen refresh rates for gaming experience, the Tecno Spark 10 pro emerges as the superior choice with its impressive 90Hz refresh rate, surpassing the Vivo X80 that only comes with 60Hz capability. The higher refresh rate of the Tecno Spark 10 pro translates to smoother motion and more responsive visuals during gaming sessions, providing a competitive edge for gamers. The 120Hz refresh rate allows for quicker updates of on screen content, reducing motion blur and enhancing the overall gaming performance. A higher refresh rate is crucial for delivering a more immersive and fluid gaming experience, particularly in fast paced games where quick reactions are essential.

Camera Features

Tecno Spark 10 pro appears to be in for some tough competition from the Vivo X80. While the Tecno Spark 10 pro settles for a Dual Setup, the Vivo X80 takes things up a notch with its impressive Triple Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the Vivo X80 promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Tecno Spark 10 pro Dual Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the Vivo X80 in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Tecno Spark 10 pro and Vivo X80 are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 50 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Tecno Spark 10 pro and Vivo X80 on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.

Delving further into the intricacies of the camera features on both smartphones, a distinctive characteristic emerges in the Vivo X80, setting it apart from the Tecno Spark 10 pro, that is inclusion of dedicated lenses for Telephoto functionality. This noteworthy feature, absent in the Tecno Spark 10 pro, grants the Vivo X80 the capability to employ optical zoom, ensuring sharper and more detailed results when capturing distant subjects. The absence of dedicated Telephoto lenses in the Tecno Spark 10 pro implies a reliance on alternative methods, potentially utilizing digital zoom, which often compromises image quality. The Vivo X80 incorporation of optical zoom through its dedicated Telephoto lenses signifies a strategic enhancement in the realm of smartphone photography, offering users the advantage of capturing distant scenes with precision and clarity.

When discussing front camera features, the Tecno Spark 10 pro and Vivo X80 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Tecno Spark 10 pro and Vivo X80. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

When look on to front camera features of the Tecno Spark 10 pro and Vivo X80, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 32 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Tecno Spark 10 pro and Vivo X80 stand on equal footing with an 32 MP configuration.

Next, In the realm of video recording, a noteworthy distinction arises between the Tecno Spark 10 pro and the Vivo X80. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the Tecno Spark 10 pro is a significant limitation when compared to the Vivo X80, which incorporates OIS technology. OIS plays a crucial role in reducing unwanted motion and vibrations during video recording, resulting in smoother and more professionally captured footage. In practical terms, this means that the Vivo X80 can deliver more stable and visually appealing videos, especially in situations where there might be hand movements or external disturbances. The inclusion of OIS in the Vivo X80 contributes to a superior video recording experience, making it a more desirable choice for users who prioritize high quality and steady video footage over time.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Tecno Spark 10 pro surpasses the Vivo X80. The Tecno Spark 10 pro boasts a substantial 5000 mAh battery, while the Vivo X80 falls slightly behind with a 4500 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Tecno Spark 10 pro as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Tecno Spark 10 pro is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Vivo X80.

In a positive development, both the Tecno Spark 10 pro and Vivo X80 incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Vivo X80 emerges as the more advanced choice. The Vivo X80 boasts a Fast Charging capability of 80W, surpassing the Tecno Spark 10 pro 18W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Vivo X80 as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Vivo X80 ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Tecno Spark 10 pro and Vivo X80, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Expandable storage with external memory card
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Low quality body material used
  • Average WLAN connection speed

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

Benchmark

Point Result

Tecno Spark 10 pro

Build Quality : 75
Display : 90
Camera : 85
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 90
Connectivity : 80
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 95

Vivo X80

Build Quality : 95
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Tecno Spark 10 pro

Tecno Spark 10 pro

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Tecno Spark 10 pro has better overall performance than Vivo X80, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Tecno Spark 10 pro has a very similar overall performance to Vivo X80, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Vivo X80

Vivo X80

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Vivo X80 has better overall performance than Tecno Spark 10 pro, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Tecno Spark 10 pro

Tecno Spark 10 pro

Amazon
Vivo X80

Vivo X80

Amazon