Poco F5 Pro

Poco F5 Pro

Triple Setup

204 gram

5160 mAh

Android 13

6.67" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Oppo Pad 2

Oppo Pad 2

Single Setup

552 gram

9510 mAh

Android 13

11.61" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Announced

Date

May 2023

March 2023

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

Unknown

OPD2201

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 13

Android 13

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

MIUI 14

ColorOS 13.1 UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

-

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

-

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
70

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.3, A2DP, LE

5.3, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
100

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

162.7 x 75.4 x 8.5 mm

258 x 189.3 x 6.5 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

204 g

552 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Aluminum, IP53 Rated

Aluminum

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Black, White

Gray, Gold

Official available body color options.

Score

100
85

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1

Mediatek Dimensity 9000

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Adreno 730

Mali-G710 MC10

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

8GB / 12GB

8GB / 12GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB / 521GB

256GB / 521GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

-

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.67"

11.61"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

AMOLED

IPS LCD

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1440 x 3200 pixels

2000 x 2800 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

20:9 ratio, (~526 ppi density), 120Hz, HDR10+, Corning Gorilla Glass 5

~296 ppi density, 1B Colors, Dolby Vision, 144Hz

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
90

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

5160 mAh

9510 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 67W, Wireless fast charging 30W

Fast charging 67W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C & Wireless charging

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Single Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 64 MP, f/1.79, 1.4µm, PDAF

13 MP, f/2.2, AF

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2

-

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

-

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Single Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

16 MP, f/2.45

8 MP, f/2.0

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 1080p@30fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
80

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

Stereo Speaker

Dual Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

100
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

-

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

-

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

-

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Infrared Blaster, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Color Spectrum

Accelerometer, Gyro, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
80

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $420

~ $490

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €410

~ €480

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2 share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with aluminum materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2 becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of aluminum.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2.

When it comes to screen protection, the Poco F5 Pro stands out as the superior choice. With its pre installed scratch-resistant glass, the Poco F5 Pro offers users a robust defense against daily wear and potential damage. In contrast, the Oppo Pad 2 lacks notable screen protection features. The presence of scratch-resistant glass on the Poco F5 Pro not only ensures the longevity and durability of the device but also provides users with a reliable shield against accidental scratches and impacts. This feature enhances the overall user experience by minimizing the risk of screen damage and offering a more resilient device.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Poco F5 Pro outshines the Oppo Pad 2, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~526, the Poco F5 Pro surpasses the Oppo Pad 2, which boasts ~296 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Poco F5 Pro elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the Oppo Pad 2.

In terms of display hardware, the Poco F5 Pro stands out with its AMOLED technology display, presenting a significant advantage over the Oppo Pad 2, which incorporates an IPS LCD screen. The Poco F5 Pro with AMOLED technology excels in providing superior visual performance, marked by vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and higher contrast ratios. The architecture of AMOLED displays involves the emission of light individually from each pixel, facilitating precise control and achieving true blacks by completely turning off pixels. This characteristic contributes to a more immersive viewing experience characterized by enhanced color accuracy and sharpness.

When considering the refresh rate feature, the Poco F5 Pro boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, while the Oppo Pad 2 takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 144Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.

Connectivity Features

Comparing the Poco F5 Pro that comes with 5G network capabilities, to the Oppo Pad 2 which lacks mobile SIM network support, underscores a clear advantage for the Poco F5 Pro. In circumstances where users prioritize the use of mobile SIM features on their devices, the Poco F5 Pro stands out as the preferable choice. The absence of mobile SIM network support in the Oppo Pad 2 may limit its functionality for users seeking seamless connectivity through mobile networks. Consequently the Poco F5 Pro emerges as the superior option in this particular aspect of comparison.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2 are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 6 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Poco F5 Pro nor Oppo Pad 2 holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2 both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.3 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Poco F5 Pro and the Oppo Pad 2, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Leveraging NFC technology, the Poco F5 Pro emerges as the superior choice over the Oppo Pad 2 due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the Oppo Pad 2. The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the Oppo Pad 2 hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Poco F5 Pro enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, the Poco F5 Pro is equipped with 8GB / 12GB of RAM, while the Oppo Pad 2 offers a range of 8GB / 12GB. Ultimately, both devices share an equivalent RAM configuration, resulting in a tie between them. A substantial RAM amount is advantageous for device performance, enabling smoother multitasking and efficient handling of memory intensive tasks. With ample RAM, applications can run concurrently without experiencing slowdowns or performance bottlenecks. This becomes particularly beneficial for users who engage in activities such as gaming, video editing, or running multiple applications simultaneously.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Turning attention to the internal memory specifications, Poco F5 Pro presents a range of 256GB / 521GB of internal memory storage, while Oppo Pad 2 offers a 256GB / 521GB internal memory storage. In this context, both devices share an identical internal memory capacity, resulting in a tie between them. The parity in internal memory amounts suggests that users can expect a similar level of storage capabilities from both Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2. This tie indicates that, in terms of internal memory storage alone, neither device holds a distinct advantage over the other, providing users with a comparable storage experience regardless of their choice between the two.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Poco F5 Pro stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 paired with the Adreno 730. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 provides substantial processing power, while the Adreno 730 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Poco F5 Pro, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Oppo Pad 2 stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Mediatek Dimensity 9000 processor and the Mali-G710 MC10. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Mediatek Dimensity 9000 provides robust processing capabilities, while the Mali-G710 MC10 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Oppo Pad 2 excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Oppo Pad 2 emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Reflecting the hardware performance specifications, both the Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2 may showcase real life performance results that are either side by side or nearly identical. While not perfectly identical, the subtle differences between the two devices may not significantly impact the overall gaming experience. The closely matched specifications suggest that users can expect a similar level of performance from both devices in terms of gaming. Whether navigating through graphics intensive games or engaging in casual gaming experiences, the overall gaming performance of the Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2 is likely to be comparable.

Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the Poco F5 Pro and the Oppo Pad 2 may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The Poco F5 Pro, equipped with a 6.67" screen, is notably smaller than the Oppo Pad 2, which boasts a more generous 11.61" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the Oppo Pad 2, offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the Oppo Pad 2, with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.

Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the Poco F5 Pro boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, while the Oppo Pad 2 takes it up a notch with an impressive 144Hz capability. This distinction places the Oppo Pad 2 in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.

Camera Features

The main camera setup of the Poco F5 Pro surpasses that Oppo Pad 2, offering a more comprehensive photography experience. The Poco F5 Pro boasts Triple Setup configuration, providing users with a versatile range of shooting options, enabling users to capture diverse scenes with precision and creativity. In contrast, the Oppo Pad 2 falls behind with its Single Setup features, limiting the variety of photographic capabilities available to users. The additional lens on the Poco F5 Pro enhances its imaging capabilities, making it a more enticing choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and dynamic camera system.

Navigating the landscape of main camera resolution, the Poco F5 Pro emerges as a standout against the Oppo Pad 2, showcasing an impressive 64 MP camera, while the Oppo Pad 2 only comes with 13 MP. Higher megapixel counts typically correlate with finer details and heightened clarity in captured images. This increased resolution opens up possibilities for more extensive cropping and zooming without sacrificing image quality, a significant boon for photography enthusiasts keen on capturing intricate details.

Furthermore, elevated megapixel counts contribute to heightened performance in well lit conditions, yielding sharp and vibrant images. While it's crucial to acknowledge that megapixels alone do not determine camera quality, a larger count, exemplified in the Poco F5 Pro, often signals a camera potential for delivering visually stunning and meticulously detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2 appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

A cursory examination of front camera specifications reveals that the Poco F5 Pro outshines the Oppo Pad 2, boasting a significantly higher 16 MP front camera compared to the 8 MP front camera on the Oppo Pad 2. In general, a higher megapixel count in a front camera tends to contribute to better image resolution and clarity in selfies. A larger megapixel count allows for more details to be captured, resulting in sharper and more vivid images. This can be particularly beneficial for selfie purposes, as users often seek clear and detailed self portraits. The higher resolution provided by a larger megapixel count allows for better cropping and zooming without compromising image quality, contributing to an overall improved selfie experience.

Sadly, the both of Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2 are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2 may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Substantial contrast in battery capacity between the Poco F5 Pro and the Oppo Pad 2, with the Oppo Pad 2 boasting an impressive 9510 mAh compared to the Poco F5 Pro 9510 mAh, significantly impacts their overall performance. In this scenario, the larger battery in the Oppo Pad 2 proves advantageous for several reasons. A bigger battery translates to a higher energy reservoir, allowing the device to sustain prolonged usage without requiring frequent recharges. This is particularly beneficial for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day, ensuring that the Oppo Pad 2 can provide a longer lasting and more dependable power supply.

In the realm of fast charging features, the Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2 stand shoulder to shoulder, as both devices are equipped with the identical Fast Charging 67W capability. This parity in charging technology ensures that users can expect a similar and efficient charging experience from both devices. With neither device holding a distinct advantage in terms of charging speed, the result is a tie. The shared Fast Charging 67W feature positions the Poco F5 Pro and Oppo Pad 2 on an equal footing, making them both suitable choices for users seeking a reliable and reasonably fast battery charging performance.

Security Features

At the security features, Poco F5 Pro demonstrates superiority over Oppo Pad 2, primarily owing to its incorporation of a dedicated biometric sensor designed to enhance the device security. This contrasts sharply with Oppo Pad 2, which lacks a dedicated biometric sensor, resulting in all security measures remaining at a standard level. The absence of a specialized security sensor on Oppo Pad 2 places it at a disadvantage, as Poco F5 Pro provides users with an elevated and secure means of device access and authentication through its dedicated biometric feature.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Wireless charging support
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

No notable advantages found on this device

  • High quality build materials
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Lacks 5G network support
  • Lacks NFC feature
  • No physical security sensor supported
  • Mobile network not available
  • No SIM Card function supported

Benchmark

Point Result

Poco F5 Pro

Build Quality : 100
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Oppo Pad 2

Build Quality : 85
Display : 90
Camera : 80
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 70
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 80
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Poco F5 Pro

Poco F5 Pro

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Poco F5 Pro has better overall performance than Oppo Pad 2, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Poco F5 Pro has a very similar overall performance to Oppo Pad 2, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Oppo Pad 2

Oppo Pad 2

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Oppo Pad 2 has better overall performance than Poco F5 Pro, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Poco F5 Pro

Poco F5 Pro

Amazon
Oppo Pad 2

Oppo Pad 2

Amazon