Xiaomi Civi 3

Xiaomi Civi 3

Triple Setup

173.5 gram

4500 mAh

Android 13

6.55" (Inch)

12GB / 16GB RAM

Motorola Edge 30 Fusion

Motorola Edge 30 Fusion

Triple Setup

168 gram

4400 mAh

Android 12

6.55" (Inch)

8GB / 12GB RAM

Announced

Date

May 2023

September 2022

Official announcement date only, not the date for product release.

Model Detail

GTIN / MPN

23046PNC9C

Unknown

Product identifier details, such as a unique serial number, build number, or model ID.

Platform

OS

Android 13

Android 12

Operating system type (OS) and version number.

Firmware

MIUI 14

Android Stock UI

Specific firmware name used on the device.

Network

Bands

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G

2G / 3G / 4G / 5G / CDMA / EVDO

Available mobile network support options.

SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Dual SIM, Nano SIM

Type and support for Subscriber Identity Module (SIM) feature.

Score

100
100

Mobile network functionality is an important feature that must be available on modern devices. This feature enables users to use a SIM card to access online networks, facilitating connections between individuals. Good mobile networks must have a fast connection, use the latest technology, and adopt extra features to support the needs of users.

In our matrix calculation, we calculate the mobile network score using a technology adoption approach. If a device offers more complete features on the network bands and uses extra features on the SIM card function, it will receive a higher score. A higher score on this segment will provide a faster and more flexible experience when using the mobile network function.

Connectivity

WLAN

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, Dual Band

Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, Dual Band

Available enabled features on wireless internet network connection hardware.

Bluetooth

5.3, A2DP, LE

5.2, A2DP, LE

Version and features of Bluetooth hardware.

USB

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Type of connectivity port hardware.

Score

100
100

Similar to the mobile network function, the connectivity feature is also an important feature for modern devices. With this feature, devices can connect to other supporting gadgets, such as internet routers, computers, speakers, wearable devices, and others.

Good connectivity features on devices must adopt all the latest wireless connection technologies available. This ability allows devices to make more connections to other devices using the latest Bluetooth technology with lower latency and achieve faster internet connection from the WLAN network.

In this situation, we use a calculation methodology with a technology approach. If a device supports more features on the WLAN function, uses the latest Bluetooth version, and has a modern universal connection port, we can assign a high score to the device. This means that a higher score will bring a more flexible user experience in terms of connectivity.

Body & Design

Dimension

158.7 × 71.7 × 7.5 mm

158.5 x 72 x 7.5 mm

Dimensions of the device in millimeters (Height x Width x Length).

Weight

173.5 g

168 g

Weight of the device in grams.

Material

Aluminum

Aluminum

Type of main body materials and any extra features if available.

Color Options

Gray, Gold, Green, Purple

Gray, White, Gold, Blue

Official available body color options.

Score

85
85

The body material is an important consideration for users who want a premium device or need the device for long term use. Therefore, the device must have a good and strong body material component.

In this segmentation, we measure the body and design score using a quality and variety color approach. If a device uses good materials like aluminum and stainless steel, the score will be higher than a device that adopts plastic as the main body material component. If a device uses a more premium body material component and also provides extra protection from water and dust damage, the score will be even higher.

However, we do not include body dimensions and weight information in our matrix calculation because these factors are subjective and can vary from user to user. Some users may prefer larger and bolder devices, while others may prefer smaller and lighter ones. Therefore, we do not include this information in the score calculation.

Performance

CPU

MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultra

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+

Chipset (CPU) hardware name and series.

GPU

Mali-G610

Adreno 660

Graphic (GPU) hardware name and series.

Score

100
100

The chipset performance on a device is a vital aspect that concerns most people. This is reasonable because most users want a device that can process tasks quickly. The CPU and GPU are the main components that affect performance.

The CPU processes tasks, and the GPU renders images. Both are related to providing the best experience for users. The better the CPU, the more efficient the device will be in terms of battery consumption, because the best CPU is smarter and more advanced in handling system logic.

We calculate the matrix for this segmentation using a performance result approach, where the data is obtained from several benchmark tools. This is done to bring more relevance to the actual data from the performance score. Additionally, the latest chipset model is not always better than the older chipset model because we use an overall performance approach that calculates based on real performance and not just based on the chipset model.

The total score is calculated from the combination of the CPU and GPU scores. The higher the score, the faster and smoother the processing will be for the user's needs.

Memory

RAM

12GB / 16GB

8GB / 12GB

Amount of random access memory (RAM) in size capacity.

Internal

256GB / 521GB / 1TB

128GB / 256GB / 512GB

Total amount of internal memory storage capacity.

External

-

-

Type of third party memory expansion feature, if available.

Score

100
100

Besides the chipset, memory is also an important component that users must consider when purchasing a device, as it is closely related to the device's performance.

For instance, multitasking is a simple example that highlights the importance of memory performance. If the RAM storage is insufficient, the user may not be able to run several apps simultaneously, and if the RAM runs out, the apps may crash, which can cause the device to reboot automatically.

Moreover, modern apps require large RAM usage to run smoothly, making the RAM sector a crucial factor in our matrix calculation score. We can say that 65% of the score comes from the RAM performance.

We also consider the internal storage when calculating our score. A larger internal storage size will result in a higher score, as the internal storage is crucial for multimedia purposes, among others. Therefore, we pay more attention to this sector.

However, we do not include external storage in our matrix score calculation because several modern users prefer to use cloud storage services instead of physical expansion memory. Furthermore, cloud storage services offer many benefits such as ease of use, safety, and lower cost, as opposed to buying external memory expansion, which is more expensive and less safe.

Screen & Display

Size

6.55"

6.55"

Screen size in inches.

Panel

OLED

P-OLED

Type of display panel hardware.

Resolution

1080 x 2400 pixels

1080 x 2400 pixels

Screen resolution in pixels.

Other

20:9 ratio, (~402 ppi density), HDR10+, 120Hz

20:9 ratio, (~402 ppi density), 1B Colors, 144Hz, HDR10+

Any extra display and screen features if available.

Score

100
100

To ensure the best user experience while using a device, the display and screen sector must be given special attention by the user. This is because the display and screen sector is the first thing that users see on their device, and high definition images on the display screen will enhance the user experience.

A good display screen hardware and software can greatly enhance activities such as navigating, using apps and games, and enjoying entertainment content on the device. When measuring the quality of a display panel, we look at the technology used, screen resolution, and extra features such as screen refresh rate, PPI, and screen protector. However, screen size is not included in our calculation matrix because it is relative and difficult to quantify.

A higher score on the display and screen segmentation means that the device will have excellent visual quality and provide the user with the best experience for any image or visual activity.

Battery

Type

Li-Po

Li-Po

Type of battery model.

Capacity

4500 mAh

4400 mAh

Battery capacity in milliampere hours (mAh).

Feature

Fast charging 67W

Fast charging 68W

Any extra features related to the power sector, if available.

Charger Model

USB Type-C

USB Type-C

Charging method and type of charger port model.

Score

100
100

A good device is one that can last all day. Modern devices can typically endure for more than 20 hours under normal use, although some may only last for 16 to 18 hours. Therefore, if you want a device with a good battery life, you should pay attention to the battery segmentation on the device.

To help users determine how good the battery sector is on a device, we calculate a score using several metrics. First, we calculate the battery capacity and also consider battery features such as whether it supports fast charging or not.

We also factor in the charger method support to create a score. If the device supports multiple charge methods, such as wireless charging, we give it a higher score in the battery segmentation. However, we do not include battery type information in our matrix calculation because it is unnecessary.

It's important to note that a higher score on the battery segmentation does not necessarily mean that the device will have better battery endurance life than other devices. Although it is usually the case, our score is not based solely on battery life but also on the advanced battery features and support available on the device.

Camera

Rear

Triple Setup

Triple Setup

Total number of rear cameras.

+

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.77, OIS, PDAF

(Main) 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS

Details of the main camera unit.

+

(Ultrawide) 8 MP, f/2.2

(Ultrawide) 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 1.12µm, AF

Details of the secondary camera unit, if available.

+

(Macro) 2 MP, f/2.4

(Depth) 2 MP, f/2.4

Details of the third camera unit, if available.

+

-

-

Details of the fourth camera unit, if available.

Front

Dual Setup

Single Setup

Total front camera number, if available.

+

(Main) 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm

32 MP, f/2.5, 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF

Details of the main front camera unit, if available.

+

(Ultrawide) 32 MP, f/2.0, 100˚

-

Details of the secondary front camera unit, if available.

Feature

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@30fps

Video Recording 4K@30fps / 1080p@120fps

Available video recording support and features.

Score

90
90

The camera feature is a brilliant thing that modern devices offer. With this feature, we can capture any moment as quickly as possible and share the result directly on social media to show others the interesting moments we capture.

Generally, modern devices come equipped with a single camera, while others have more than one camera setup. This is amazing because with a variety of camera lens styles on a single device, we can take photos in multiple styles, including portrait photos, landscape photos, or take photos of faraway objects using zoom cameras.

A good camera feature should produce high quality, clear images with low noise and offer multiple lens styles. You can determine the quality of the camera feature by looking at the score on the camera segmentation. If the score is high, that means the camera feature on that device is brilliant and very good.

For the matrix calculation, we not only consider individual camera specifications but also combine all information data. We consider how many camera lenses are available on the device, how good the main camera features are for both rear and front cameras, and how good the camera can be used for recording video. All of these factors directly impact the matrix calculation score.

Audio & Sound

Type

Loudspeaker

Loudspeaker

Primary sound system type.

Extras

-

Stereo Speaker

Extra sound system features.

Score

85
100

For those who love listening to music, watching movies, and playing competitive online games on their device, it's important to pay attention to the audio and sound quality. Not all modern devices have good audio and sound quality, with many only being average.

To determine the quality of audio and sound, you can check the score we have calculated for this segmentation. Our matrix calculation is based on available features, such as the presence of a 3.5mm jack and stereo speaker support. If a device has these extra features, it will receive a higher score. Additionally, we may give extra points if the device collaborates with popular and trusted sound system makers, as this ensures a higher quality of sound.

Sensor

Biometric

Fingerprint (under display)

Fingerprint (under display)

Biometric security hardware model, if available.

GPS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS

Yes, A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO

Global Positioning System (GPS) hardware support and features.

NFC

Yes

Yes

Near Field Communication (NFC) function support.

Other

Infrared Blaster, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass

Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass

Available sensor hardware type and function.

Score

100
100

Sensors are an essential part of modern devices, providing various functionalities such as security, utility, payment, navigation, and specialized features for specific situations. A good device should have complete sensor features to fully meet the user's needs. While most modern devices have all standard sensor features, some devices have more complete sensor features than others.

To assess the quality of a device's sensor features, we calculate a score that takes into account all sensor information. However, we focus on two key sensor features, that are common security sensor and the NFC sensor. These are industry standards for all modern devices and play a critical role in ensuring security and convenience for the user.

The score resulting from the matrix calculation reflects how good a device is in terms of sensor features. A higher score indicates that the device has more complete sensor features and is more flexible in use. This, in turn, makes the user happier with the device.

Price

USD

~ $340

~ $610

Price in US dollars (USD).

EUR

~ €330

~ €600

Price in Euros (EUR).

Comparison Breakdown

Durability

Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion share a similar build quality as both devices are constructed with aluminum materials. In this instance, as both phones employ the same build material, it results in a tie in terms of build quality. The overall durability and resilience of the devices would likely be comparable, and any distinctions would likely arise from additional design features or engineering considerations beyond the basic material used. Therefore, the build quality comparison between the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion becomes a neutral factor due to their shared use of aluminum.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.

Visual Quality

In terms of visual quality performance, the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion deliver similar results, both featuring a typical pixel density of ~402 pixels per inch (ppi). The identical ppi values in both devices imply that they share the same level of pixel concentration within a one inch square on their displays. Consequently, their visual quality remains consistent, resulting in a tie between the two in terms of display clarity and sharpness. The matching ppi values suggest that users can expect a comparable visual experience from both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, highlighting their similarity in this particular aspect of performance.

In a general perspective, the Xiaomi Civi 3 equipped with an OLED display panel, and the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also featuring an P-OLED display, both leverage advanced screen technologies known for their superior visual characteristics. The displays are share similarities, such as individual pixel illumination, resulting in deeper blacks and vibrant colors. Choosing between them often depends on individual preferences. Ultimately, determining which is better may vary based on specific user priorities, such as display preferences, device usage, and overall visual experience requirements.

When considering the refresh rate feature, the Xiaomi Civi 3 boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, while the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes the experience to the next level with an impressive 144Hz refresh rate. Measured in hertz (Hz), the refresh rate indicates how many times a display refreshes per second. A higher refresh rate enhances visual experiences by contributing to smoother on screen motion, particularly beneficial for gaming and dynamic content. This elevated refresh rate not only minimizes motion blur but also grants a significant competitive advantage in gaming, where swift and precise visual feedback is crucial for an immersive and responsive user experience.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Regarding the Wi-Fi technology evaluation of the Xiaomi Civi 3 that equipped with Wi-Fi 6, a noteworthy comparison arises with the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion which utilizes the latest Wi-Fi 6e technology. This distinction positions the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion at the technological forefront, as Wi-Fi 6e provides superior data transfer speeds, reduced latency, and enhanced efficiency, surpassing the capabilities of Wi-Fi 6. So, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion with Wi-Fi 6e features, becomes a more advanced choice if compared to the Xiaomi Civi 3, ensuring an even more seamless and robust wireless connectivity experience for users.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Xiaomi Civi 3 is equipped with advanced Bluetooth 5.3, surpassing the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, which only utilizes Bluetooth 5.2. This condition gives the Xiaomi Civi 3 a distinct advantage, as Bluetooth 5.3 brings more enhancements in terms of data transfer speeds, range, and overall efficiency compared to Bluetooth 5.2. Therefore, the Xiaomi Civi 3 is better and more technologically advanced in the realm of Bluetooth connectivity when compared to the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.

Now, Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion stand on equal ground as both incorporate NFC technology, this results in a draw between the two. NFC (Near Field Communication) is a wireless communication technology that enables the seamless exchange of data between devices in close proximity, typically within a few centimeters. It finds application in various scenarios, from mobile payments to instant data transfer, making it a valuable feature for modern smartphones.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Considering the specification data, Xiaomi Civi 3 boasts 12GB / 16GB of RAM, surpassing Motorola Edge 30 Fusion offering 8GB / 12GB RAM. In this scenario, Xiaomi Civi 3 holds a distinct advantage due to its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is beneficial for multitasking and handling resource intensive applications. With more RAM, the device can efficiently manage multiple tasks simultaneously, leading to smoother performance and faster responsiveness. This translates into a superior user experience, especially for those who engage in demanding tasks or run numerous apps concurrently.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referring to the specification data, Xiaomi Civi 3 emerges as the superior choice over Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, evident in its internal memory configuration of 256GB / 521GB / 1TB, surpassing the 128GB / 256GB / 512GB range offered by the latter. The advantage of having a larger internal memory becomes apparent as it allows users to store a greater volume of data, including apps, photos, videos, and files. This expanded storage capacity is particularly advantageous for users with extensive multimedia libraries, those engaged in content creation, or those who require ample space for various applications. Xiaomi Civi 3 higher internal memory range positions it as a more suitable option for individuals seeking a device with generous storage capabilities, accommodating diverse needs and ensuring a smoother user experience.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, Xiaomi Civi 3 stands out with its impressive hardware, featuring the robust MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultra paired with the Mali-G610. This dynamic combination ensures a superior gaming experience, highlighting the device capability to handle high performance tasks with ease. The MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultra provides substantial processing power, while the Mali-G610 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. Gamers can enjoy a lag free and enhanced gaming experience on the Xiaomi Civi 3, even when using high presets. The device overall performance shines, offering users confidence in its ability to deliver smooth and uninterrupted gaming sessions without compromising on quality or experiencing degraded performance.

Next, Motorola Edge 30 Fusion stands out as a gaming powerhouse, equipped with the formidable Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ processor and the Adreno 660. This powerful combination ensures a top notch gaming experience for users, showcasing the device ability to handle even the most demanding titles with ease. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ provides robust processing capabilities, while the Adreno 660 contributes to seamless graphics rendering. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion excels in delivering an outstanding overall performance, allowing users to indulge in high preset graphics for games without any concerns about lag or degraded gaming quality. With this impressive hardware specification, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion emerges as a compelling choice for gamers who prioritize a premium gaming experience on their mobile devices.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the comparison between Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion suggests that the former may offer a superior performance due to its larger RAM capacity. A larger RAM amount contributes significantly to the overall performance of a mobile device, particularly in the context of gaming. RAM functions as the temporary storage space for active applications, including games. With a greater RAM capacity, a device like Xiaomi Civi 3 can efficiently handle and store more game related data, reducing the likelihood of slowdowns, lags, or interruptions during gameplay. This is crucial for demanding games that require quick data access and smooth transitions. In essence, a larger RAM capacity allows for better and smoother gameplay.

In the context of gaming experience, a comparison of screen sizes between the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion reveals a notable parity, as both devices boast an identical 6.55" screen size. In this scenario of uniform screen dimensions, it logically follows that the gaming experience on both devices would be equivalent. The equality in screen dimensions implies a consistent visual experience, enabling gamers on both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion to enjoy games with a uniform field of view and level of immersion. When screen sizes align, as in this case, the potential for a comparable gaming experience is elevated, underscoring the significance of screen dimensions in shaping the overall enjoyment of gaming on mobile devices.

Discussing screen refresh time, which can be crucial for gaming, the Xiaomi Civi 3 boasts a 120Hz refresh rate, while the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes it up a notch with an impressive 144Hz capability. This distinction places the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion in a more advantageous position, promising enhanced gaming performance for users. The elevated refresh rate ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and delivering a visually immersive gaming experience. Consequently, it is particularly beneficial for fast paced gaming styles.

Camera Features

When it comes to the main camera features, both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion share a common ground, utilizing a Triple Setup. The similarity in their camera configurations suggests that the two devices offer a comparable photography experience. So, in this case, the outcome is a tie, as both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion provide similar main camera capabilities, making it a matter of user preference and other device features when choosing between the two.

Examining the main camera resolution features, it appears that the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion are on an equivalent level, both equipped with a 50 MP camera. This parallel specification results in a tie between the two devices in terms of megapixel count. A 50 MP camera provides a substantial resolution, allowing for detailed and clear images. While other factors contribute to overall camera performance, the identical main camera resolution positions the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion on an even playing field, leaving users to consider additional features and capabilities when making a choice between the two.

It's evident that the Xiaomi Civi 3 holds a distinct advantage over the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion in terms of front camera capabilities. The Xiaomi Civi 3 boasts a Dual Setup, offering a more sophisticated and versatile approach to capturing selfies compared to the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, which features a Single Setup. The Dual Setup configuration on the Xiaomi Civi 3 opens up possibilities for advanced imaging and creative possibilities, catering to users who prioritize a richer and more comprehensive front camera experience. This significant difference in front camera setups establishes the Xiaomi Civi 3 as a superior option for individuals who place a premium on advanced selfie capabilities and diverse photography options.

When look on to front camera features of the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 32 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion stand on equal footing with an 32 MP configuration.

Interesting distinction arises when comparing the front camera features of the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. The Xiaomi Civi 3 sets itself apart by incorporating dedicated ultrawide lenses in its front camera setup, a feature that significantly enhances its selfie capabilities. Unfortunately, this particular feature is absent in the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, placing the Xiaomi Civi 3 at an advantage in terms of front camera performance, especially for those who value a wider perspective in their selfies. The inclusion of dedicated ultrawide lenses on the Xiaomi Civi 3, making it a favorable choice for individuals seeking advanced front camera features.

On video recording capabilities, both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion stand out as excellent choices, sharing the notable feature of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). This technology designed to minimize the impact of shaky movements or vibrations when capturing videos. It employs sensors and actuators to detect and counteract any unintended motion, resulting in smoother and more stable video footage. This feature is particularly beneficial for users who engage in handheld video recording, especially in dynamic or unpredictable environments. The inclusion of OIS in both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion ensures a high quality video recording experience, allowing users to capture clear and steady footage even in challenging conditions.

Battery Endurance

Comes to the battery power, it becomes evident that the Xiaomi Civi 3 surpasses the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. The Xiaomi Civi 3 boasts a substantial 4500 mAh battery, while the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion falls slightly behind with a 4400 mAh capacity. This discrepancy in battery size positions the Xiaomi Civi 3 as the more potent device in terms of power. With a higher milliampere-hour rating, the Xiaomi Civi 3 is poised to deliver extended usage and endurance, providing users with a more robust and long lasting battery performance compared to the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.

In a positive development, both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion incorporate the advantageous Fast Charging feature. However, when delving into the specifics, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion emerges as the more advanced choice. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion boasts a Fast Charging capability of 68W, surpassing the Xiaomi Civi 3 67W Fast Charging. This notable difference in charging speeds positions the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion as the superior option in terms of battery replenishment time. With its faster charging performance, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion ensures a swifter and more efficient charging experience, making it a preferred choice for users who prioritize rapid battery charging without compromising on overall device performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Xiaomi Civi 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.

Advantages

Pros list

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • Multiple front camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor

No notable advantages found on this device

  • Full 5G network support
  • High quality build materials
  • Multiple rear camera options
  • NFC capability
  • Brilliant display panel
  • Fast WLAN connection
  • Latest Bluetooth technology
  • Large RAM capacity
  • Large internal memory
  • Fast charging feature
  • Dedicated biometric sensor
  • Stereo speaker function

Disadvantages

Cons list

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

  • Average sound & audio quality

No significant disadvantage features found on this device

Benchmark

Point Result

Xiaomi Civi 3

Build Quality : 85
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 85

Motorola Edge 30 Fusion

Build Quality : 85
Display : 100
Camera : 90
Performance : 100
Memory : 100
Network : 100
Connectivity : 100
Battery : 100
Sensor : 100
Audio : 100

Final Score

/ 1000

/ 1000

The total score is calculated based on all segmentation scores, and the maximum score is 1000. The total score reflects the overall quality of the device. If a device has a higher total score than its competitors, it is considered better overall.

However, a high total score does not necessarily mean that the device is excellent in all segmentation scores. If you are looking for a device with specific features, it is best to look at the score for that particular segmentation to make an informed decision.

Based on our calculation matrix, the best device overall on this comparison page is :

The Winner is :

Xiaomi Civi 3

Xiaomi Civi 3

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Xiaomi Civi 3 has better overall performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Both are Winner!

After comparing the specifications data above, we can conclude that Xiaomi Civi 3 has a very similar overall performance to Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, based on the final score data.

The Winner is :

Motorola Edge 30 Fusion

Motorola Edge 30 Fusion

After comparing the specifications data above, we can confidently say that Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has better overall performance than Xiaomi Civi 3, based on the final score data.

[*] This means that there are multiple series numbers (GTIN/MPN) associated with this product.

Prices listed are for reference only and may not reflect the actual market price. Additionally, the price of the product may vary between different countries.

It's important to note that it may not always be 100% correct. Factors such as missing information from the manufacturer or third-party sources, differences in how information is reported, and human error during data collection can impact accuracy.

May Your Lucky Day

Other Popular Comparison From Both Devices :

Xiaomi Civi 3

Xiaomi Civi 3

Amazon
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion

Motorola Edge 30 Fusion

Amazon