Durability

The Kyocera Digno SX3 stands as a rugged phone, purpose built to excel in challenging environments, while the ZTE S30 SE represents a standard smartphone design. When it comes to navigating extreme conditions, the Kyocera Digno SX3 takes the lead, offering superior build quality tailored for durability. Unlike the standard design of the ZTE S30 SE, the Kyocera Digno SX3 features a reinforced casing constructed from robust materials, ensuring resistance to impacts, drops, and shocks. This enhanced structural integrity equips the Kyocera Digno SX3 to endure the rigors of harsh environments with greater resilience than the ZTE S30 SE.

Both of devices share a common feature in their covers, making their build quality comparable. The utilization of the same material underscores their uniformity in terms of both aesthetics and durability, leaving consumers to make their choices based on other distinguishing features or preferences in the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE.

Visual Quality

In the domain of visual quality, the Kyocera Digno SX3 outshines the ZTE S30 SE, owing to its superior pixel density measured in pixels per inch (ppi). With an impressive ppi of ~431, the Kyocera Digno SX3 surpasses the ZTE S30 SE, which boasts ~395 ppi. the ppi is represents the number of pixels densely packed within a one inch square on a display.

A higher ppi indicates a more concentrated pixel arrangement, resulting in a sharper and more detailed visual experience. This characteristic proves especially advantageous for tasks such as reading text, viewing images, and watching videos. Consequently, the Kyocera Digno SX3 elevated ppi contributes to a visually appealing and clear display, ultimately enhancing the overall user experience in comparison to the ZTE S30 SE.

In the realm of display panel technology, the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE share a common ground, both featuring IPS LCD screens. IPS LCD brings forth advantages such as wide viewing angles, accurate color reproduction, and enhanced visibility. The identical utilization of IPS LCD in both devices ensures that users can expect a consistent and reliable visual experience. This similarity becomes particularly notable in scenarios where display technology plays a pivotal role, providing users with a comparable and satisfactory viewing experience on both the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE.

From the screen refresh rate features, the Kyocera Digno SX3 and the ZTE S30 SE align with their 60Hz screen refresh rates. This commonality suggests that both devices deliver a comparable level of smoothness and responsiveness in visual interactions. The refresh rate, measured in hertz (Hz), determines how frequently a display refreshes per second, playing a pivotal role in optimizing the user experience, particularly during activities such as scrolling or gaming. In this comparison, the Kyocera Digno SX3 and the ZTE S30 SE find themselves in a tie, providing users with an equally display performance.

Connectivity Features

If we compare the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE, both are supported by 5G networks, their performance in this aspect will be a tie. The absence of a distinction in their network support positions the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE on equal footing, making the performance in this regard identical. Users seeking advanced 5G connectivity features can find both devices to be equally capable, offering a comparable experience in terms of network performance.

Concerning Wi-Fi sector technology, Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE are on the same level, featuring with the Wi-Fi 5 technology. This similarity in wireless capabilities results in a tie when comparing their Wi-Fi technology. Both devices deliver similar performance in terms of data transfer speeds, connectivity, and efficiency. In this scenario, neither Kyocera Digno SX3 nor ZTE S30 SE holds a distinct advantage over the other, as they share the same technological foundation in the realm of wireless connectivity.

Next, in the Bluetooth technology sector, the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE both come equipped with Bluetooth 5.1 technology. This condition results in a tie for both devices, as they use the same Bluetooth version. So, in terms of Bluetooth connectivity, there is no distinct advantage between the Kyocera Digno SX3 and the ZTE S30 SE, as they offer comparable features and performance within the realm of Bluetooth technology.

Leveraging NFC technology, the Kyocera Digno SX3 emerges as the superior choice over the ZTE S30 SE due to its NFC functionality, a feature notably absent in the ZTE S30 SE. The NFC (Near Field Communication) are stands as a wireless technology facilitating swift and seamless data transfer between devices in close proximity. The absence of NFC in the ZTE S30 SE hampers its capacity for convenient interactions, whether it be quick file sharing, contactless payments, or efficient connectivity with other NFC enabled devices. In contrast, the inclusion of NFC in the Kyocera Digno SX3 enhances its versatility and practicality, providing users with a broader range of seamless applications.

RAM & Storage

In this RAM comparison, our focus is specifically on evaluating the performance of the highest variant RAM option available for both devices. By narrowing the scope to the top tier RAM configurations, we aim to provide a targeted analysis of the devices capabilities in terms of memory capacity and speed. This approach allows for a more direct and relevant assessment, particularly for users who prioritize and invest in the most robust RAM configurations offered by each device.

Examining the specification data, Kyocera Digno SX3 offers a RAM configuration of 4GB, while the ZTE S30 SE boasts a more substantial 6GB RAM range. Clearly, the ZTE S30 SE holds a significant advantage with its larger RAM capacity. A greater RAM amount is advantageous for various reasons. Firstly, it enables the seamless execution of resource intensive applications, resulting in enhanced performance and quicker responsiveness. Moreover, a larger RAM capacity facilitates smoother multitasking, allowing users to effortlessly switch between applications without experiencing lags or slowdowns.

Similar to our approach in comparing RAM, we focus exclusively on evaluating the highest variant of internal memory available for both devices. This targeted comparison ensures a comprehensive analysis of the devices storage capabilities by considering their top tier configurations. By concentrating on the highest internal memory variants, we provide users with insights relevant to those seeking maximum storage capacity and performance. This approach acknowledges that consumers who opt for the highest memory configurations prioritize ample storage for various applications, multimedia content, and files.

Referencing the specifications, Kyocera Digno SX3 offers internal storage options ranging from 64GB, while ZTE S30 SE surpasses this with an impressive 128GB internal memory storage. The significant advantage of having a larger internal storage capacity is evident in ZTE S30 SE, allowing users to store a significantly greater amount of data, applications, and multimedia content. This extensive storage is especially beneficial for users engaged in activities such as high resolution video recording, photography, and downloading large applications or files. ZTE S30 SE stands out as a superior choice for individuals prioritizing extensive internal storage for their device.

Differing from the Kyocera Digno SX3, the ZTE S30 SE stands out by offering an extra feature external memory expansion option. This feature, notably absent in the Kyocera Digno SX3, proves to be quite beneficial for users seeking versatility and increased storage flexibility. With this capability, users can enhance the device existing storage by adding a compatible external memory card. It's particularly advantageous for individuals needing extra space to store large files, multimedia content, or additional applications, all without being confined to the limitations of the device internal storage. The external memory expansion feature empowers users to personalize and expand their storage capacity based on their evolving needs, providing a convenient solution for those with dynamic or expanding data requirements.

Gaming Experience

Within the domain of gaming experience comparisons, evaluating performance by individual devices on a global scale becomes a more viable approach, given the inherent challenges associated with directly comparing devices side by side based solely on CPU and GPU specifications. The complexity, nuanced software optimizations, and diverse user preferences make a comprehensive side by side comparison using hardware specifications alone a difficult task. Relying solely on such technical data may lead to ambiguous or misrepresented results. Therefore, focusing on the overall performance of individual devices can provides a more holistic perspective.

First, The Kyocera Digno SX3 adopts an entry-level hardware configuration, featuring the MediaTek Dimensity 700 processor coupled with the Mail-G57 MC2. While this combination is suitable for basic tasks and casual use, it falls short in delivering a robust gaming experience for more demanding titles. Technically adept at handling low to mid graphic presets, the Kyocera Digno SX3 may struggle with the demands of hardcore gaming, limiting its ability to provide optimal performance and graphical fidelity. Users seeking a device primarily for casual or less graphics intensive gaming may find the Kyocera Digno SX3 sufficient, but those with a penchant for more resource intensive games might need to explore higher tier options for a smoother and more immersive gaming experience.

Next, ZTE S30 SE features a balanced hardware configuration, incorporating the MediaTek Dimensity 700 processor and Mali-G57 MC2. Positioned as a device catering to the middle-class gaming segment, this combination allows for a satisfactory gaming experience at mid-level presets. While it may not compete with flagship devices in terms of extreme graphics performance, the MediaTek Dimensity 700 and Mali-G57 MC2 tandem enables the ZTE S30 SE to proficiently handle gaming tasks at mid to high graphic presets. Overall, the device delivers a commendable performance, ensuring users a smooth and enjoyable experience across various gaming scenarios, striking a practical balance between performance and affordability.

Move to RAM specification hardware, the fact is Kyocera Digno SX3 comes with less RAM than ZTE S30 SE. Technically, a larger RAM amount can significantly enhance the capability to handle extensive game resources. In the realm of gaming performance, the ZTE S30 SE holds an advantage over the Kyocera Digno SX3 due to its superior RAM capacity. The larger RAM allows for smoother, quicker data access, and more efficient handling of resource intensive game elements. This translates to a better overall gaming experience on the ZTE S30 SE, as it can navigate demanding games with ease, minimizing lags, and providing users with a more immersive and responsive gameplay environment.

Achieving an optimal gaming experience, the comparison of screen sizes between the Kyocera Digno SX3 and the ZTE S30 SE may one of emerges as a crucial factor. The Kyocera Digno SX3, equipped with a 6.1" screen, is notably smaller than the ZTE S30 SE, which boasts a more generous 6.67" display. This substantial contrast in size is poised to exert a significant impact on the gaming experience. A larger screen, exemplified by the ZTE S30 SE, offers gamers a more expansive and immersive field of view, enhancing the appreciation of in-game details and facilitating improved navigation within virtual environments. This advantage becomes especially critical in gaming scenarios that require precision and swift reactions. Consequently, the ZTE S30 SE, with its larger screen size, is positioned to deliver a superior gaming experience by providing players with a more visually immersive and enjoyable platform.

Considering the screen refresh rate for gaming experience, both the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE stand on equal footing with identical 60Hz screen refresh time features. This parity in refresh rates implies that both devices offer the same level of performance in this aspect, resulting in a tie between them. The 60Hz refresh rate shared by Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE ensures smoother transitions between frames, reducing motion blur and contributing to an enhanced gaming experience. As neither device holds a distinct advantage in this particular feature, users can expect a comparable and satisfactory gaming performance from both the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE, making the choice between them more dependent on other factors.

Camera Features

Kyocera Digno SX3 appears to be in for some tough competition from the ZTE S30 SE. While the Kyocera Digno SX3 settles for a Single Setup, the ZTE S30 SE takes things up a notch with its impressive Triple Setup arrangement. With more lenses features at its disposal, the ZTE S30 SE promises a richer and more diverse set of features for photography enthusiasts. This expanded camera system likely incorporates various focal lengths and capabilities, giving users a more advanced and versatile tool for capturing moments. In comparison, the Kyocera Digno SX3 Single Setup appears comparatively limited, placing the ZTE S30 SE in a favorable position for those who prioritize a more comprehensive main camera experience.

Transitioning to main camera resolution, the Kyocera Digno SX3 introduces a 8 MP camera, while the ZTE S30 SE boasts an impressive 48 MP. In this aspect, the ZTE S30 SE holds the edge, as its larger megapixel count surpasses that of the Kyocera Digno SX3. The significance of a higher megapixel count lies in its ability to capture more intricate details and offer heightened clarity in images. A larger resolution facilitates extensive cropping and zooming capabilities without compromising on the quality of the captured content.

This advantage becomes particularly pronounced in scenarios where users prioritize precision and intricate detailing in their shots. While it's essential to consider other factors for a comprehensive evaluation of camera performance, a higher megapixel count, as evident in the ZTE S30 SE, often indicates a camera potential for delivering visually superior and finely detailed photographs.

When discussing front camera features, the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE appear to be on par, as both devices feature a Single Setup camera configuration. This similarity results in a tie when considering the basic front camera setup. However, it's crucial to note that the differentiation may lie in specific features unique to each devices camera system. Examining additional specifications, such as sensor quality, image processing capabilities, and any specialized features, will likely reveal distinctions that can influence the overall performance and user experience of the front cameras on the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE. While they share a common Single Setup, the truth may be in the details when comparing the specific attributes that contribute to the overall imaging capabilities of these devices.

When look on to front camera features of the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE, a striking similarity becomes apparent, as both devices are equipped with an 8 MP front facing camera. This identical camera setup results in a tie when evaluating this specific aspect of the devices. While the resolution remains the same, it's important to note that factors such as sensor quality, image processing algorithms, and additional features can still contribute to nuanced differences in the overall front camera performance. However, in terms of the basic front camera megapixel count, the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE stand on equal footing with an 8 MP configuration.

Sadly, the both of Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE are lack Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) feature in the video recording sector, leaving them with standard video recording capabilities. OIS is crucial for video recording as it helps mitigate the effects of hand movements, shakes, and vibrations, ensuring that the captured footage remains smooth and stable. Without OIS, videos recorded on devices like the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE may suffer from noticeable jitteriness, particularly in situations where the camera is handheld or subject to external movements. The absence of OIS limits the devices ability to deliver professionally looking and steady video content, which can be a significant consideration for users who prioritize high quality video recording in various environments.

Battery Endurance

Examining the specifications in battery power, it becomes evident that the Kyocera Digno SX3 falls short in comparison to the ZTE S30 SE. The Kyocera Digno SX3 is equipped with a 4500 mAh battery, whereas the ZTE S30 SE boasts a more substantial 6000 mAh capacity. This slight but significant difference in battery capacity positions the ZTE S30 SE as the preferable choice for those prioritizing extended usage. The higher milliampere-hour rating of the ZTE S30 SE translates to a potentially longer lasting power performance, highlighting the importance of even small disparities in battery capacities when evaluating the overall endurance of devices.

Then, if we comparing the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE, it becomes evident that the ZTE S30 SE holds a significant advantage. The ZTE S30 SE is equipped with Fast Charging 18W features, a noteworthy capability absent in the Kyocera Digno SX3. This distinction gives the ZTE S30 SE a clear edge in terms of charging efficiency. With its faster charging technology, the ZTE S30 SE ensures a more rapid replenishment of the battery compared to the Kyocera Digno SX3. In scenarios where quick charging is a priority, the ZTE S30 SE stands out as a superior choice, offering users a more expedited charging experience without compromising on performance.

Security Features

Luckly, users can find satisfaction in both the Kyocera Digno SX3 and ZTE S30 SE, as both devices are equipped with dedicated biometric sensors. This inclusion enhances the security features of both devices, providing users with a robust means of safeguarding their data and device access. Having a dedicated biometric sensor, offers users a more secure and convenient method of authentication. The uniqueness and precision of biometric data make it challenging for unauthorized users to gain access, contributing to an overall heightened level of security. This not only protects sensitive information but also enhances the user experience by providing a swift and personalized means of unlocking and accessing the device.